20:30:22 <prometheanfire> #startmeeting requirements 20:30:23 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 20 20:30:22 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is prometheanfire. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:30:24 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:30:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'requirements' 20:30:31 <prometheanfire> #topic rollcall 20:30:33 <prometheanfire> tonyb, prometheanfire, number80, dirk, coolsvap, toabctl, smcginnis, dhellmann ping 20:30:36 <prometheanfire> o/ 20:30:50 <smcginnis> o/ 20:31:05 <johnsom> o/ 20:32:13 <prometheanfire> #topic Any controversies in the Queue? 20:32:17 <prometheanfire> johnsom: ? 20:32:23 <johnsom> lol 20:32:55 <johnsom> So, yappi was added to g-r recently and then used in oslo.service 1.37 which was also recently released. 20:32:57 <smcginnis> No controversies that I have seen, though been busy. 20:33:04 <johnsom> However, it has a known bug: 20:33:10 <johnsom> #link https://github.com/sumerc/yappi/commit/778829f6f77928e4292e6a7dd4dfecf501f9a362 20:33:16 <johnsom> That causes it to fail to install 20:33:47 <johnsom> I started the process to blacklist that version of oslo.service as this was the only change in that version. 20:34:16 <johnsom> I also attempted to contact the yappi developer (looks like a one person show) asking if we could get a release with the fix. 20:35:01 <johnsom> He did release 1.0 overnight. I have marked the oslo.service blacklist as WIP and proposed an upper-constraints bump for yappi to 1.0 20:35:03 <smcginnis> johnsom: So there isn't a 1.0.0 release with this fix? 20:35:08 <smcginnis> Ah, OK. 20:35:23 <johnsom> #link https://review.openstack.org/638177 20:35:49 <prometheanfire> johnsom: should make your exclusing in gr depend on the 1.0 update (since it's known bad 20:36:02 <johnsom> So, it looks like that is +W, so I don't think there is a controversy after all... grin 20:36:13 <prometheanfire> :D 20:36:19 <smcginnis> I guess there is the one controversial patch for the stable update. 20:36:22 <smcginnis> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637124/ 20:36:24 <prometheanfire> https://review.openstack.org/637124 20:36:27 <prometheanfire> heh 20:36:30 <smcginnis> ;) 20:36:44 <prometheanfire> I don't think we should accept that (based on discussions on the ml) 20:36:51 <prometheanfire> and with fungi (ping?) 20:36:51 <smcginnis> I guess based on the ML discussion we should maybe abandon that? 20:36:59 <prometheanfire> ya 20:37:02 <smcginnis> Guess we're in sync today. 20:37:09 <prometheanfire> and close the related bug with refrences 20:37:15 <smcginnis> ++ 20:37:55 <prometheanfire> ok, nothing else 20:38:17 <smcginnis> Lots of junk in the open queue that would be nice to clean up, but nothing controversial I guess. 20:38:18 <prometheanfire> #topic other things 20:38:25 <prometheanfire> I'll go through and clean it up 20:38:33 <prometheanfire> smcginnis: we really are in sync today 20:38:39 <smcginnis> :) 20:38:47 <prometheanfire> #topic ptg 20:39:00 <prometheanfire> travel is not approved til mid march probable, though I have my ticket 20:39:16 <smcginnis> Finally registered today. But no travel booked yet. 20:39:34 <prometheanfire> will probably only be there for the ptg as well 20:39:58 <smcginnis> You have more important things than the Summit. ;) 20:40:09 <prometheanfire> so I keep hearing 20:40:19 <prometheanfire> #topic open floor 20:40:46 <smcginnis> I've got nuthin 20:41:49 <johnsom> prometheanfire Do we really need the oslo.service blacklist patch? It should just pick up 1.0 right? 20:42:00 <tonyb> Oh phooey I missed the rollcall because ... $otehr meeting 20:42:15 <prometheanfire> johnsom: it should, I think we need to blacklist yappi though (the bad version, 0.90?) 20:42:16 <smcginnis> tonyb: You made it before the end at least. 20:42:44 <johnsom> Well, I know 0.99 is broken, but I don't know if/when it was good 20:43:15 <prometheanfire> johnsom: so blacklist the known bad version 20:43:36 <johnsom> Yep, fair. I will put a patch up after the UC is up and proven good 20:43:36 <tonyb> smcginnis: \o/ 20:43:47 <prometheanfire> #topic update on constraints publishing 20:43:47 <smcginnis> Or would it make sense to raise the lower constraints so it has to be 1.0 or later? 20:43:48 <tonyb> johnsom: sounds good 20:43:50 <prometheanfire> tonyb: :D 20:44:06 <prometheanfire> smcginnis: we don't track lc anymore, that's per project 20:44:13 <smcginnis> Oh, right. 20:45:20 <prometheanfire> tonyb: you're up 20:45:31 <smcginnis> tonyb: Is it done yet? :P 20:47:16 <tonyb> prometheanfire: it isn't done but the new designe is much 'cheaper' I need to sync up with the release team (hi o/) and infra to work out the right way to go forward 20:47:40 <prometheanfire> tonyb: ok, I might bug you about some afs stuff (if you know about it) 20:47:48 <prometheanfire> #topic open floor again 20:47:55 <tonyb> prometheanfire: It looks like we don't need AFS anymore 20:48:20 <prometheanfire> I need it for something else (gentoo binpkg publishing for osa test timeouts) 20:48:25 <tonyb> prometheanfire: I *think* it's a rebuild of the apache config for releases.o.o and then publish a .htaccess 20:48:28 <tonyb> prometheanfire: Ahh okay 20:48:50 <prometheanfire> sounds like we are done? 20:49:19 <smcginnis> Guess so. 20:49:38 <prometheanfire> #endmeeting