14:00:59 #startmeeting releaseteam 14:00:59 Meeting started Fri Jan 5 14:00:59 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:59 The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 14:01:06 o/ 14:01:13 happy new year o/ 14:01:23 Was about to ping you, I'll skip that. Happy new year! 14:01:57 Our agenda is at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-relmgt-tracking down to line ~168 14:02:10 #topic Review task completion 14:02:21 * Ahead of MembershipFreeze, run governance_consistency.py (ttx) 14:02:33 So I did that and got a couple of hits 14:02:44 First, defined in governance but not in deliverable files: 14:03:13 magnum-capi-helm-charts: Added Aug 2023, never released yet, no activity... maybe we should ask the Magnum team what they want to do about it in Caracal 14:03:52 yepp, this seems new 14:03:58 The other two have been around for a while without being released: barbican-ui (barbican) and rbd-iscsi-client (cinder) 14:04:11 I suspect those two are still not ready 14:04:23 i have the same feeling 14:04:33 elodilles: could you follow up with Magnum on the first one? I'm off next week 14:04:46 ttx: sure, will do 14:05:18 thanks! 14:05:33 np 14:05:39 We also have things defined in deliverable files but not in (active) governance: 14:05:45 A lot of Tripleo deliverables are still defined in _independent 14:06:11 i've been meaning to ask the tc what the next steps are with those 14:06:18 if we don;t expect new releases there we should make them release-model: abandoned so they do not trigger in our tooling 14:06:30 people still report security bugs for them, but i have the impression there's nobody around to fix anything 14:06:35 fungi: that would be great 14:07:08 i think tonyb was also going to make inquiries inside rh 14:07:15 fungi: can I add a task for you regarding that? 14:07:20 please do 14:07:26 i'll get it on the tc's meeting agenda 14:08:09 The other one is cinderlib 14:08:18 which is now marked deprecated for 2024.1. 14:08:39 I suspect the caracal deliverable file should be removed? 14:08:43 i was just now reviewing the deprecation change for it in opendev systems 14:08:53 will probably merge in a few minutes 14:09:16 i can propose the patch to remove the cinderlib deliverable, 14:09:24 and we'll need PTL+1 for that anyway 14:09:28 ok and we can follow up on that 14:09:35 ++ 14:09:47 probably don't need ptl +1 since there's a governance change which already merged 14:09:53 that was all the discrepancies that were found 14:09:54 but up to you 14:09:59 fungi: oh, that's true :S 14:10:14 #link https://review.opendev.org/903259 Deprecate cinderlib 14:10:21 The other task was to send the email, which I'll do once we review it 14:10:31 #topic Assign R-12 tasks 14:10:33 i'll ping the PTL/release liaison then simply via IRC 14:10:49 They are all assigned 14:11:14 Thanks elodilles for covering for us French vacationers 14:11:22 #topic Review email to send 14:11:36 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails 14:12:37 lgtm 14:12:45 mail LGTM 14:13:12 (maybe the 2024.1 in the 1st line is not needed... anyway, i've added it there) 14:13:27 ack 14:13:31 will send in a few 14:13:32 (feel free to skip it if you don't like it there :)) 14:13:40 +1 14:13:50 #topic Open Discussion 14:13:57 Anything else? 14:14:14 one thing from me: 14:15:04 i've started to mess around with the new unmaintained/ branching & -eom tagging 14:15:10 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:relmgt-unmaintained-state 14:16:11 this should be more or less enough to make it work as a minimum, but i need reviews 14:16:31 to catch if i've missed anything 14:16:41 ok will have a look today before I leave 14:16:51 thanks in advance o/ 14:17:11 Anything else? 14:17:12 then we definitely need some testing with release-test 14:17:20 that's all from me 14:17:40 Alright then, let's close early... 14:17:45 #endmeeting