14:00:01 <hberaud> #startmeeting releaseteam
14:00:01 <openstack> Meeting started Fri May 28 14:00:01 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:02 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:04 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
14:00:05 <hberaud> Ping list: elod armstrong
14:00:11 <armstrong> o/
14:00:13 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-relmgt-tracking
14:00:18 <hberaud> We're way down on line 128 now.
14:00:29 <hberaud> Will just wait a couple minutes for folks.
14:00:59 <elod> o/
14:02:16 <ttx> o/
14:03:00 <hberaud> Let's go!
14:03:05 <hberaud> #topic Review task completion
14:03:12 <hberaud> Ensure that all trailing projects have been branched for the previous series. => Done
14:03:22 <hberaud> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22xena-milestone-1%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
14:03:36 <hberaud> We are near from the end of this topic
14:04:11 <hberaud> Cinder asked to get more time to check patches
14:04:19 <hberaud> Monasca need to fix some gates
14:04:55 <hberaud> I just updated os-ken and osc-placement
14:05:06 <hberaud> I think that we can approve those without response, I don't expect response from team
14:05:18 <elod> osc-placement needs double check by RH nova folks
14:05:27 <hberaud> Any opinion concerning those without response?
14:05:32 <elod> I mean that's what gibi asked
14:05:38 <hberaud> Yes
14:05:58 <hberaud> osc-placement and os-ken are not part of those without response
14:06:08 <elod> ack
14:06:14 <hberaud> they need PTL/liaison approval as usual
14:07:20 <hberaud> I'll ping the PTLs of those without response once again we can proceed them on Monday
14:07:57 <hberaud> Next task
14:08:03 <hberaud> Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary libraries which did not release since the previous release. => Done
14:08:33 <hberaud> Deadline for trailing project is at R-14 so we will double check this point later
14:09:05 <hberaud> "To catch if there are acl issues in newly created repositories", ttx, armstrong any updates?
14:09:38 <armstrong> We found noissue
14:09:50 <armstrong> *no issue
14:09:52 <hberaud> Excellent, thank you
14:10:03 <hberaud> So next topic
14:10:04 <ttx> confirmed
14:10:16 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-18 tasks
14:10:19 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Transition Train to EM  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790776
14:10:49 <hberaud> Nothing much for R-18, we only need to double check the milestone-1 remaining patches
14:11:07 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-15 tasks
14:11:17 <elod> I guess that could be 'all' :)
14:11:31 <hberaud> yes
14:12:43 <hberaud> Concerning R-17 and R-16 we don't have lot of tasks to manage, so I proposed to manage the emails sending, and to assign R-15 now to allow us to skip meetings during these weeks
14:13:03 <hberaud> As long as we don't have last minutes emergencies
14:13:34 <hberaud> I take the task
14:13:44 <hberaud> (at R-15)
14:14:08 <hberaud> So next meeting will be R-14, that work for you?
14:14:23 <elod> works for me
14:14:32 <hberaud> armstrong: thanks I'll ping you
14:14:40 <armstrong> ok
14:14:58 <hberaud> ttx: ^
14:15:06 <elod> ( ~ one month without a meeting :-o )
14:16:28 <ttx> yes please
14:16:36 <hberaud> #topic Review countdown email contents
14:16:48 <hberaud> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
14:18:14 <hberaud> So concerning this email I've a question concerning the goals
14:18:31 <hberaud> IIRC xena is without goal from a TC point of view
14:18:58 <ttx> hmm ok
14:19:03 <hberaud> so I think that a part of the first sentence need to be removed
14:19:21 <hberaud> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/xena/index.html => 404
14:19:31 <ttx> done
14:19:39 <elod> ++
14:19:47 <hberaud> the rest seems ok to me
14:19:58 <ttx> i think they said "no goals in Xena"
14:19:59 <armstrong> LGTM!
14:20:05 <hberaud> yeah
14:20:11 <hberaud> ok thanks
14:20:17 <elod> maybe
14:20:25 <elod> we can add OFTC there?
14:20:37 <hberaud> in the email?
14:20:40 <elod> in the mail
14:20:49 <elod> just a thought
14:20:52 <hberaud> Yeah I was thinking about that
14:21:11 <hberaud> Can't hurt, that could be another reminder
14:21:22 <elod> something like that
14:21:29 <elod> feel free to edit
14:21:37 <elod> or remove :)
14:21:38 <hberaud> yes excellent, short at efficient
14:21:46 <hberaud> s/at/and/
14:22:06 <hberaud> Anything else concerning the email?
14:22:22 <ttx> nope
14:23:02 <hberaud> #topic Train-em status
14:23:20 <hberaud> So just a quick status about train-em
14:23:22 <hberaud> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22train-em%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
14:23:37 <elod> or just the open ones: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:train-em+is:open
14:23:47 <hberaud> thanks
14:23:56 <hberaud> indeed
14:24:15 <elod> we got some responses, so the list is shrinking
14:24:32 <hberaud> I think that we can continue with keystone, solum, senlin, murano
14:24:35 <elod> but still there are some -1 and some without response
14:24:52 <hberaud> I need to recheck the state of oslo
14:25:02 <elod> I'll try further pinging on IRC and/or mail
14:25:05 <hberaud> and if the patches have been merged
14:25:57 <hberaud> I propose to wait until next friday and then maybe cut there. @eldo: what do you think about that?
14:26:10 <elod> sounds OK to me
14:26:21 <hberaud> cool
14:27:32 <hberaud> so next topic
14:27:40 <hberaud> #topic Open Floor
14:27:58 <hberaud> Anything else that you want to discuss today?
14:28:11 <elod> maybe two small things to mention
14:28:23 <elod> 1. the easy one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/791702
14:28:33 <elod> i think we can proceed with this one ^^^
14:28:51 <ttx> looking
14:29:07 <hberaud> done
14:29:23 <ttx> yeah that one does not appear on my dashboard so i missed it
14:29:40 <elod> thx :) after all the jobs have finished i'll run the branch deletion script
14:30:09 <hberaud> thank you elod
14:30:24 <elod> the 2nd thing is openstack/os-cloud-config related,
14:30:35 <elod> as it doesn't have an ocata-eol tag,
14:30:56 <elod> however it has an entry in the repository
14:31:24 <elod> I forgot to mention this during the week
14:31:37 <elod> so my question is what can we do about it
14:33:31 <elod> https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/ocata/os-cloud-config.yaml#L36-39
14:33:34 <elod> vs
14:33:35 <hberaud> I'm not sure to understand, you mean that the ocata-eol entry exist here in openstack/release (https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/ocata/os-cloud-config.yaml#L39) but the tag doesn't exist https://opendev.org/openstack/os-cloud-config# ? I'm right?
14:33:40 <elod> https://opendev.org/openstack/os-cloud-config/src/tag/ocata-eol
14:33:54 <hberaud> Ok
14:33:59 <elod> hberaud: yes
14:34:07 <hberaud> good question...
14:34:12 <hberaud> this project seems abandonned
14:34:15 <hberaud> so...
14:34:32 <hberaud> I'm not it's worth to force something here
14:35:10 <hberaud> maybe we could simply remove the exist entry and simply retry to recreate it
14:35:17 <elod> yes, I just wanted to delete the branch, and thought maybe the tag can be added manually, or something, just to reflect the required state
14:36:01 <hberaud> Maybe we could start with the deletion/addition and see what will happen
14:36:24 <elod> otherwise some patches will be lost. (i know that it's an abandoned branch, but...)
14:36:25 <hberaud> and then if that doesn't work escalate it to the infra team
14:36:38 <elod> i'm sure the deletion will work :)
14:36:47 <hberaud> lol me too
14:36:51 <ttx> yeah it probably does not matter that much
14:37:06 <elod> the question is whether we want to have a tag just for the sake of completeness :)
14:37:31 <hberaud> if this is possible then I prefer this scenario
14:37:44 <hberaud> explicit is better than implicit
14:38:33 <elod> ok, maybe fungi knows how to apply manually the tag. I'll try to ping him :)
14:39:07 <elod> and that's it from me
14:40:53 <openstackgerrit> Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: delete the missing ocata-eol tag  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/793610
14:40:53 <openstackgerrit> Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: reapply the missing ocata-eol tag  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/793611
14:40:56 <hberaud> elod: ^
14:41:21 <elod> hberaud: that looks also good to me, thanks :D
14:41:41 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Create ocata-eol tag for horizon project  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/791702
14:43:14 <hberaud> ttx, elod, armstrong  FYI => http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022737.html Just to ensure that everybody have seen it
14:43:19 <hberaud> Anything else?
14:43:41 <elod> nothing from me
14:44:16 <armstrong> ok thanks for sharing will register soon
14:44:24 <hberaud> thanks
14:44:51 <armstrong> please, this is the feedback link on etherpad for my research https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/armstrong
14:45:08 <hberaud> Thank you armstrong
14:45:10 <armstrong> I will appreciate your criticisms
14:45:25 <hberaud> I'll have a look
14:45:32 <armstrong> thanks hberaud
14:46:09 <hberaud> OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up.
14:46:13 <hberaud> #endmeeting