17:00:27 <hberaud> #startmeeting releaseteam
17:00:28 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Mar  4 17:00:27 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
17:00:36 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda
17:00:44 <hberaud> Ping list: ttx armstrong elod damani
17:00:49 <armstrong> o/
17:00:54 <ttx> o/
17:01:29 <hberaud> We're way down on line 387 now.
17:01:37 <elod> o/
17:01:37 <hberaud> Will just wait a couple minutes for folks.
17:03:18 <hberaud> #topic Review task completion
17:03:24 <hberaud> Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary libraries => Done
17:03:28 <hberaud> Few patches remains opened https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-lib-freeze%22+(status:open)
17:04:05 <hberaud> Some juste needs a final +2
17:04:14 <hberaud> Feel free to approve them
17:04:45 <elod> even if there are no PTL-approved stamp on them?
17:04:51 <hberaud> Only os-brick -1
17:05:08 <hberaud> nope wait for them
17:05:18 <elod> ack
17:05:24 <hberaud> We can wait until ~Monday
17:05:44 <hberaud> Nova +1%2
17:05:59 <elod> anyway, will review those that have PTL-approved :)
17:06:05 <hberaud> We wait for their PTL double check
17:06:14 <hberaud> ack thanks elod
17:06:22 <hberaud> ok next task
17:06:41 <hberaud> Update the feature list and allowed stable branch names in devstack-gate => elod the floor is yours
17:06:56 <elod> i've proposed the patch,
17:07:13 <elod> added the question there,
17:07:33 <elod> as it might be still needed by some jobs
17:07:56 <elod> and added the folks as reviewers, who might know the answer :)
17:08:24 <elod> anyway, I'll try to double-check myself + ping them
17:08:30 <hberaud> Ok thanks
17:08:49 <hberaud> Seems undercontrol :)
17:09:05 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-5 tasks
17:09:31 <hberaud> I already cherry-picked few of them
17:09:47 <hberaud> Evaluate any libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model.
17:09:52 <hberaud> Takers?
17:10:17 <ttx> o/
17:10:19 <ttx> can do
17:10:41 <hberaud> Thanks ttx
17:10:57 <hberaud> List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet
17:11:03 <hberaud> Any volunteer?
17:11:30 <armstrong> I will like to do that
17:11:52 <hberaud> ok thanks armstrong I put our name
17:11:59 <hberaud> s/our/your
17:12:16 <armstrong> ok
17:12:19 <hberaud> armstrong: do not hesitate to ping us if needed
17:12:30 <armstrong> sure
17:12:38 <hberaud> and the last one
17:12:40 <hberaud> On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches.
17:12:44 <hberaud> Takers?
17:13:45 <hberaud> I take this one
17:15:18 <hberaud> armstrong: FYI the "Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary client" task is mostly automatized, nothing more to see here
17:15:40 <armstrong> ok
17:16:04 <hberaud> armstrong: However we can run a peer session like the last one :)
17:16:30 <hberaud> armstrong: I'll surely do that tomorrow, WFY?
17:16:44 <armstrong> @hberaud sure, I really want to learn the process and tool more
17:16:53 <hberaud> armstrong: sure np
17:17:00 <hberaud> you are welcome
17:17:01 <armstrong> Friday what time?
17:17:35 <hberaud> ~2 pm UTC WFY?
17:18:01 <armstrong> ok sounds good
17:18:25 <hberaud> awesome then see you here around 2 pm
17:18:42 <hberaud> #topic Review countdown email contents
17:18:52 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
17:21:08 <hberaud> Good catch
17:21:08 <ttx> fixed two typos, looks good
17:22:53 <openstackgerrit> Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: fix typos  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778755
17:23:02 <hberaud> ttx: fixed there too ^
17:23:07 <hberaud> #topic Xena's PTL election
17:23:30 <ttx> all bow to our fearless leader
17:23:59 <elod> indeed :)
17:24:00 <hberaud> Aw, shucks. :-)
17:24:41 <hberaud> So as you already know I proposed my candidature again
17:24:57 <ttx> https://gph.is/g/aeAr3K5
17:25:24 <hberaud> lolit's too much honor
17:25:37 <hberaud> Ok thanks
17:25:39 <elod> :D
17:25:47 <hberaud> #topic PTG
17:26:00 <hberaud> New series = new PTG
17:26:39 <hberaud> Maybe it's a bit early but I already init our next etherpad  https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-os-relmgt
17:26:43 <hberaud> #link  https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-os-relmgt
17:27:08 <hberaud> We (elod and myself) already added content to our next agenda
17:27:59 <hberaud> I think that we want to run a virtual PTG, what do you think about this point?
17:28:10 <hberaud> (session)
17:28:19 <ttx> yes, short one but yes
17:28:46 <elod> +1
17:29:16 <hberaud> Ok I'll update as soon as I'll know the available time slots
17:29:30 <hberaud> #topic Open Floor
17:29:42 <hberaud> Anything else for this week?
17:30:12 <elod> nothing from me, I think
17:30:14 <fungi> infrastructure situation... we've temporarily suspended static site updates due to a possible problem with one or more cinder volumes, i need to get back to investigating once meetings calm down
17:30:36 <fungi> you'll see things like the tarballs site and release notes staying outdated for a bit longer
17:30:42 <fungi> releases site too
17:30:43 <hberaud> fungi: Thanks for the heads up
17:30:48 <ttx> noted, thanks
17:31:19 <hberaud> I think we will be poke ASAP by the RDO folks
17:31:38 <fungi> unrelated, when/where would be a good time to talk about periodic stable branch jobs? is that more the realm of the em sig? or qa team?
17:32:10 <hberaud> good question, I would say qa
17:32:19 <fungi> i've noticed that for a while i get 80+ failure e-mails on the stable-maint ml every day (and 120+ on sundays)
17:32:27 <hberaud> elod: any idea? ^
17:32:39 <fungi> just trying to figure out if anybody's actually paying attention to those notifications, or if we can get rid of that ml
17:32:41 <elod> fungi: i guess that's more of a stable SIG thing, but... :)
17:32:50 <fungi> oh, is there a stable sig too?
17:33:02 <fungi> i was only aware of the extended maintenance sig
17:33:33 <elod> yes, stable team turned to stable SIG, but I think mostly me and smcginnis were active in stable channels
17:33:50 <elod> err, yes, EM SIG
17:33:53 <elod> sorry o:)
17:34:02 <fungi> oh, i see, the sig is named "extended maintenance" but covers maintained stable branches as well
17:34:20 <elod> yes
17:34:26 <fungi> okay, thanks, should i bring the topic up on openstack-discuss or does the em sig have regular meetings?
17:34:30 <elod> and I'm usually looking at the failures there
17:34:46 <elod> no regular meeting
17:34:52 <fungi> oh, well if someone's using those then that's fine. it's a *lot* of e-mails though, and i wonder if they're all necessary
17:35:16 <elod> so maybe the openstack-discuss is the best to get attention, maybe i should have done that already :/
17:35:18 <fungi> that ml generates far more traffic than openstack-discuss ;)
17:35:30 <hberaud> :)
17:35:42 <fungi> okay, i'll bring it up there. thanks
17:35:54 <fungi> and sorry for derailing the release meeting with stable maint stuff
17:36:01 <hberaud> np :)
17:36:03 <hberaud> Anything else?
17:36:20 <hberaud> fungi: you're welcome!
17:37:22 <hberaud> 1
17:37:38 <hberaud> 2
17:37:53 <hberaud> 3
17:37:58 <hberaud> considered sold!
17:38:08 <hberaud> OK, thanks everyone. Almost there!
17:38:29 <hberaud> #endmeeting