16:00:03 <smcginnis> #startmeeting releaseteam
16:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Sep  3 16:00:03 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
16:00:11 <smcginnis> Ping list: ttx armstrong
16:00:21 <ttx> o/
16:00:51 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking Agenda, line 346
16:01:56 <smcginnis> #topic stable/victoria branching
16:01:58 <smcginnis> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749734/
16:02:06 <smcginnis> Not sure who added this, or what the question is.
16:02:17 <smcginnis> ttx: Assuming not you? :)
16:02:26 <ttx> me
16:02:30 <ttx> me me me
16:02:34 <smcginnis> :D
16:02:44 <ttx> I was about to +2A
16:02:51 <ttx> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749734/
16:03:00 <smcginnis> Yes, as far as I know, we are good to branch. We have had at least one stable/victoria branch go through already.
16:03:03 <smcginnis> No issues.
16:03:04 <ttx> when I wondered if everything was ready to ... absorb that much change
16:03:13 <ttx> ah ok
16:03:14 <ttx> cool
16:03:18 <ttx> will +2a then
16:03:28 <ttx> that is all
16:03:45 <smcginnis> We do have the change since ussuri of updating the job templates on master after branching.
16:03:52 <smcginnis> That appears to all be working well.
16:04:02 <smcginnis> os-brick cut its branch yesterday and the patch was proposed.
16:04:18 <smcginnis> There's a timing thing that ideally we want that template defined before proposing patches switching to it.
16:04:21 <diablo_rojo> o/
16:04:51 <smcginnis> We do have it for wallaby, but even if we did not, the patch would just get a failure from zuul and would just need to be rechecked once the template was actually defined.
16:05:07 <smcginnis> But everything is in place, so should (knock on wood) be smooth sailing.
16:05:39 <smcginnis> #topic Review task completion
16:06:06 <smcginnis> hberaud: Around? Have you been able to run the script to see if there are any missing c-w-i not released?
16:07:07 * smcginnis is running now to double check...
16:07:24 <smcginnis> In the meantime, next task was getting devstack-gate set up for the victoria branch.
16:07:38 <smcginnis> armstrong was able to get that ready.
16:07:44 <smcginnis> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749618/
16:08:01 <smcginnis> So we're all set there.
16:08:17 <smcginnis> And to stall for time on the script running, last task is sending the countdown email.
16:08:22 <smcginnis> I will do that tomorrow.
16:09:24 <smcginnis> Still no unreleased things identified by the script, but still running.
16:09:41 <smcginnis> Oh, and a few popped up.
16:10:21 <smcginnis> #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/797429/
16:11:56 <smcginnis> metalsmith, neutron-lib, octavia-lib, openstacksdk, os-ken, maybe some oslo stuff.
16:12:25 <smcginnis> ovsdbapp and probably tosca-parser too.
16:12:45 <smcginnis> So a few that have not had a release proposed yet that look like they have things good to get released in victoria.
16:13:48 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Release ironic-lib and create stable/victoria  https://review.opendev.org/749734
16:14:00 <smcginnis> I can propose those since today is the deadline.
16:14:03 <johnsom> smcginnis I am slightly confused. octavia-lib did it's last Victoria release, there aren't any more un-merged changes.
16:14:30 <smcginnis> johnsom: Oops, you are right. There is nothing there.
16:14:48 <smcginnis> I guess I scanned through the paste a little too fast. Sorry for scaring you. :)
16:15:06 <johnsom> Ah, ok. No problem
16:15:37 <smcginnis> ttx: I will propose the patches today. Should we give them until Monday to respond?
16:16:06 <ttx> I'd say yes
16:16:20 <smcginnis> OK, I'll try to get those proposed after the meeting.
16:16:35 <smcginnis> I guess we can move on then.
16:16:46 <smcginnis> #topic Review countdown email content
16:16:54 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails Countdown email content
16:19:24 <smcginnis> Read through again and just made one minor tweak.
16:19:39 <smcginnis> Otherwise looks fine to me. Any comments before we move on?
16:20:13 <openstackgerrit> Akihiro Motoki proposed openstack/releases master: Release neutron non-client libraries for Victoria  https://review.opendev.org/749778
16:20:49 <ttx> lgtm
16:21:04 <smcginnis> #topic Assign R-5 tasks
16:21:30 <smcginnis> First is one for all of us I think - process remaining lib freeze releases
16:21:54 <smcginnis> Reminder to ML about cycle-highlights. Should I put you down for that diablo_rojo?
16:22:24 <diablo_rojo> I sent one out Monday
16:22:31 <diablo_rojo> I was gonna send another early next week]
16:22:40 <smcginnis> Perfect
16:22:51 <diablo_rojo> I'm on it :)
16:22:52 <smcginnis> I can do the auto releases for next week.
16:23:11 <smcginnis> Next - Evaluate any libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model.
16:23:30 <smcginnis> It's another one where we have a nice handy script to do most of the work.
16:23:53 <smcginnis> If someone wants to take that, we can get a list into a paste or etherpad and discuss in next week's meeting what to do with anything that shows up.
16:23:56 <smcginnis> Any takers?
16:24:39 <diablo_rojo> I can probably do that
16:24:56 <ttx> I prefer not to commit as my week is abit crazy and I have a virtual conf
16:26:38 <smcginnis> OK, thanks diablo_rojo. I'll put you down for that one too.
16:26:47 <diablo_rojo> Sounds good
16:27:08 <smcginnis> Similar one - List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet
16:27:20 <smcginnis> Action on this one is to email the ML to highlight any of these.
16:27:39 <smcginnis> diablo_rojo: Want to do this one too? Or would you rather I do that one?
16:28:15 <smcginnis> Looks like hberaud is probably tied up right now, but also an option if he would like to pick that up.
16:28:20 <diablo_rojo> I can probably do that too.
16:28:32 <smcginnis> Awesome, thanks!
16:29:07 <smcginnis> Then last one other than the countdown email is to remind the requirements team about the freeze.
16:29:10 <smcginnis> I can do that one.
16:29:24 <smcginnis> And that's it for tasks.
16:30:19 <smcginnis> #topic Open floor
16:30:25 <smcginnis> Anything else to go over?
16:30:38 <ttx> nope
16:30:43 <diablo_rojo> nope
16:30:50 <armstrong> Hello
16:31:07 <armstrong> sorry for being late
16:31:32 <fungi> we're in the process of rolling back the setuptools<50 pins now that 50.1.0 apparently undid the distutils replacement default behavior
16:31:47 <fungi> hopefully no impact to release jobs, but worth keeping an eye out
16:31:49 <smcginnis> armstrong: No worries. Thanks!
16:32:03 <smcginnis> fungi: Thanks for the heads up. Will keep an eye on jobs.
16:32:39 <clarkb> I expect there will be a future release that flips the dfeault
16:32:46 <smcginnis> Alright, I guess we're good as far as the meeting goes. Thanks everyone for your help and working on the team.
16:32:53 <clarkb> but they seem muhc more willing to fix the problems that popped up in 48 properly this time around
16:33:01 <smcginnis> clarkb: Sounds like that would be a Good Thing.
16:33:13 <armstrong> smcginnis: i submitted the task for review
16:33:30 <smcginnis> armstrong: Yep, I did point that out in the meeting. Thanks for handling that one.
16:33:43 <smcginnis> I'll wrap things up, but feel free to stick around and discuss anything else.
16:33:47 <smcginnis> #endmeeting