15:03:08 <dhellmann> #startmeeting releaseteam
15:03:08 <openstack> Meeting started Fri Dec 16 15:03:08 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dhellmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:03:09 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:03:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
15:03:12 <dhellmann> sorry for being late, folks
15:03:31 <dhellmann> we're in the Ocata-2 milestone week, R-10
15:03:37 <dhellmann> our agenda is in the etherpad, as usual
15:03:41 <dhellmann> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-relmgt-tracking
15:03:46 <dhellmann> #topic milestone 2 status check
15:04:07 <dhellmann> we had quite a few late ones, it looks like, but not so late that ttx couldn't process them earlier today
15:04:19 <dims> o/
15:04:28 <dhellmann> there seems to have been some confusion about who needed to handle the networking-ovn release, but that's done now
15:04:42 <dhellmann> as far as I can tell, all of our milestone projects that are releasing this cycle have now tagged ocata-2
15:04:46 <russellb> sorry.
15:05:02 <sigmavirus> o/ sorry for being late
15:05:04 <dhellmann> russellb : np, this is why we have release liaisons
15:05:13 <dhellmann> oh, and I was late, and forgot to
15:05:13 <dhellmann> courtesy ping: ttx, dims, sigmavirus, tonyb, fungi, stevemar
15:05:23 <ttx> o/
15:06:00 <dhellmann> does anyone have anything else to raise about the milestone?
15:06:24 <dhellmann> alright, moving on
15:06:24 <dhellmann> #topic reno / eol branch issue retrospective
15:06:44 <dhellmann> we had some unfortunate fallout this week from deleting the stable/liberty branches
15:07:02 <dhellmann> in retrospect it was an obvious issue, but I didn't give it any thought in advance
15:07:37 <dhellmann> the "fix" in 1.9.0 wasn't quite as compatible with the work-around as I had hoped, but afaik everyone is now back to using the branch specifier and that's working
15:08:08 <dims> dhellmann : in terms of guidance to projects, what do we tell them to do going forward? (use -eol or not?)
15:08:17 <dhellmann> that is, I had suggested that folks change "origin/stable/liberty" to "liberty-eol" in their sphinx files, which worked for reno 1.8.0 but did not work when we put the fix in 1.9.0 to automatically detect the eol
15:08:34 <dhellmann> going forward they should not need to change anything, and origin/stable/liberty should work fine
15:08:44 <dims> ++ dhellmann
15:08:51 <dhellmann> we have some good tests in the dulwich-based version on master to ensure that
15:09:34 <dhellmann> I'll be working to get reno into shape for a 2.0.0 release early next week
15:09:59 <dhellmann> are there any other comments for the retrospective?
15:10:44 <ttx> nope
15:10:51 <dhellmann> #topic meeting schedule for the rest of the year
15:11:16 <dhellmann> with our meetings on fridays, I'm expecting some folks to be away on the 23rd and 30th
15:11:26 <dims> i've updated availability in etherpad dhellmann
15:11:29 <dhellmann> should we meet? should we move to a different time?
15:11:40 <dhellmann> (catching up in channel less formally)
15:11:45 <dhellmann> dims: ack, thanks
15:11:53 <dims> +1 to catch up in channel
15:12:19 <dhellmann> ok, and it looks like we'll all be away the week of 26-30 so I'll announce a release freeze during that period, too
15:12:28 <fungi> i likely won't be available on the 23rd, but my presence is noncritical
15:12:47 <ttx> +1 to informal catchup on channel
15:13:00 <ttx> and next meeting Jan 6
15:13:11 <dhellmann> ok, so we'll cancel meetings for the next 2 weeks, suggest that folks catch us in channel, and we'll communicate between ourselves there and on the ML
15:13:51 <dhellmann> #topic code reviews for tools
15:14:07 <dhellmann> we have a handful of reviews up for changes to the tools
15:14:19 <dhellmann> now that the milestone and reno push are done, please give those some attention next week
15:14:34 <dhellmann> does anyone have anything in particular they would like to highlight for a review?
15:15:09 <dims> dhellmann : release-tools?
15:15:39 <dhellmann> dims : I was thinking of things like https://review.openstack.org/411530 and https://review.openstack.org/411439
15:15:58 <dims> ack. was afraid i was missing another bucket
15:16:01 <dhellmann> I also have some early changes up to infra to move our constraints update step to its own job in https://review.openstack.org/411495
15:16:44 <dhellmann> #topic open discussion
15:16:57 <dhellmann> that's all I had on the agenda, does anyone want to raise any other points before we call the meeting?
15:17:06 <fungi> sort of tool related, but the infra documentation for how/where to document signing keys on the release site merged, and i've (finally) marked our artifact signing spec implemented
15:17:27 <dims> yay fungi
15:17:45 <dims> dhellmann: fungi: can we ask the liaisons to sign the key?
15:17:47 <dhellmann> great!
15:18:04 <fungi> dims: anyone who wants can sign the signing keys
15:18:06 <dhellmann> dims : good idea. do you want to write an email suggesting that they do?
15:18:29 <dims> #action dims to write email to folks to sign the keys
15:18:46 <fungi> i mostly wanted to make sure we have infra root admins signing them because we're the only ones with direct access to the private key to be able to absolutely attest that it's correct
15:19:00 <fungi> but anyone else who trusts it enough to add a signature is most welcome
15:19:06 <dhellmann> makes sense
15:19:30 <dims> fungi : let me draft something and you can check verbiage before i send?
15:19:35 <fungi> gladly
15:19:42 <fungi> give me a heads up when you have something
15:19:44 <dims> great
15:19:56 <dhellmann> cool, thanks to both of you
15:20:16 <dhellmann> if there's nothing else, we can close and get ~40 minutes back
15:20:50 <ttx> yes!
15:20:53 <dims> :)
15:20:59 <dhellmann> alrighty
15:21:00 <fungi> nothing on my end
15:21:00 <dhellmann> happy weekend, everyone!
15:21:05 <dhellmann> #endmeeting