19:00:21 <catherineD> #startmeeting refstack
19:00:21 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 11 19:00:21 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack'
19:00:39 <hogepodge> o/
19:01:30 <catherineD> #link meeting agenda and notes,  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-17-07-11
19:05:13 <catherineD> Paul may not be able to join today ...
19:05:30 <catherineD> Let's start ... agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-17-07-11
19:05:44 <rockyg> o/
19:06:09 <catherineD> #topic Displaying RefStack documentation
19:07:02 <mguiney> o/
19:07:19 <catherineD> This topic is now all completed ... the about page is now rendered in html format
19:07:29 <rockyg> Yay!
19:07:34 <sslypushenko_> o/
19:08:12 <catherineD> and the content are from the refstack github rst files ... so all RefStack document are from the same source ...
19:09:05 <rockyg> Yay!
19:09:21 <mguiney> \o/
19:09:40 <hogepodge> fantastic
19:09:41 <catherineD> thanks to all who worked to make this happened
19:09:55 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:10:00 <catherineD> #topic Run tool to update the verify field
19:10:11 <catherineD> tools are completed ..
19:10:37 <catherineD> hogepodge: mguiney: any news on data update?
19:11:21 <mguiney> last i remember, the goal for this one this week was to spin up a test spreadsheet and test to make sure the script was functioning properly
19:11:50 <mguiney> admittedly, this slipped my mind last week, as i was out of town for much of it
19:11:54 <mguiney> (apologies)
19:11:56 <hogepodge> mguiney: has that on her task list, but it's been backlogged pending a tempest patch and some internal openstack powered database work
19:12:03 <catherineD> mguiney: np at all
19:13:04 <catherineD> hogepodge: once the data is updated... should RefStack show the verified status info on the the results page ?
19:13:23 <hogepodge> catherineD: yeah, I think that would be helpful
19:13:32 <rockyg> Agreed.
19:14:03 <catherineD> ok
19:14:26 <catherineD> next topic
19:14:32 <catherineD> #topic     Review Pike action items ( https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-pike-ptg )
19:15:18 <catherineD> we won't be reviewing this everyweek ... next week we will just discuss the on-going tasks
19:16:09 <luzC> o/
19:16:10 <catherineD> #1     Customized guideline (Status: on going. Schema is under review )
19:17:31 <catherineD> #link  we need to review this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430556/
19:18:29 <catherineD> we need this patch to merge before we can do code update in RefStack
19:19:13 <catherineD> I guess reviewing the patch is the next  to-do for us
19:19:23 <hogepodge> yes, please review that patch. it's important and time is running out quickly
19:19:44 <hogepodge> August is a few weeks away, and I need to start building extension projects for the board meeting
19:20:11 <catherineD> #action RefStack team mebers to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430556/
19:20:36 <mguiney> (reviewing rn)
19:21:16 <catherineD> #2 Update existing certified data with the verified flag and #3 Displaying RefStack documentation
19:21:25 <catherineD> both are completed
19:21:45 <catherineD> #4 Automated tempest.conf Create spec and flow chart
19:22:18 <catherineD> From last IRC meeting, seems like the RefStack team still want to do this ...
19:22:42 <catherineD> I have contacted Germa and Daniel since they were the originator of this task
19:23:03 <catherineD> will give update when I hear from them
19:23:14 <rocky_g> Sorry.  Our guest network went away.  I'm baaaaaaack!
19:23:35 <catherineD> #5 subunit result files upload
19:24:35 <catherineD> This topic was discussed at the Interop-WG meeting on June 28, 2017 ..
19:24:53 <catherineD> there are a few actions item from the Interop-WG..
19:25:36 <catherineD> meanwhile mguiney: has submited a spec patch     Create spec for optional subunit data import (  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480298/ )
19:25:58 <catherineD> everyone please review ...
19:26:03 <mguiney> this is very much a draft, please let me know if you have any thoughts on what has been laid out htus far
19:26:10 <mguiney> *thus
19:26:33 <catherineD> will do
19:26:40 <mguiney> thank you!
19:26:59 <luzC> I'll take a look, thanks
19:27:02 <rocky_g> Hve it up in my browser.  Now, to remember to review;-
19:27:14 <catherineD> rocky_g: luzC: thx
19:27:36 <catherineD> #topic Open dicussion
19:27:59 <catherineD> anything else you want to bring up today?
19:28:03 <rocky_g> Yeah
19:28:30 <mguiney> rocky_g: ahhh i see you practice the same todo strategy i do
19:28:31 <hogepodge> I'll be in Japan and China next two weeks, so my attendance may be spotty. Include me on any reviews you want me to see
19:29:20 <catherineD> hogepodge: thx for heads-up
19:32:01 <catherineD> A heads-up from me is that I will not be a candidate for RefStack PTL on the next election ...
19:32:40 <hogepodge> what is the timing for PTL elections?
19:33:15 <rockyg> Hey.  Sorry.  Really flakey network here.
19:33:25 <rockyg> PTL elections are not quite a month away.
19:33:50 <catherineD> yea a month away
19:34:26 <hogepodge> are luzC or paul available for candidacy?
19:34:46 <rockyg> Or sslypushenko_ ?
19:35:13 <sslypushenko_> rockyg:  Thx, but not really =)
19:35:14 <luzC> unfortunately I'm not
19:35:29 <catherineD> Paul is not on IRC today ..
19:36:06 <hogepodge> I think it's worthwhile to have a transition contingency plan, then.
19:36:14 <catherineD> hogepodge: yup
19:36:47 <hogepodge> What I would like, if she's ok with it and the team is ok with it, is to really work hard over the next few months to get mguiney in a place where she can get core status
19:37:06 <rockyg> Agreed
19:37:10 <catherineD> hogepodge: ++
19:37:25 <luzC> hogepodge: +1
19:37:32 <sslypushenko_> hogepodge:  +1
19:37:40 <hogepodge> we can talk with the TC and the infra team about how we can manage the project status, because it's in a unique position
19:38:17 <catherineD> hogepodge: an other thought is to merge with Interop-WG or under Interop-WG control project?
19:38:18 <rockyg> ++
19:38:57 <luzC> yes, that will work too
19:39:21 <catherineD> at some point in the past, that is one of our option before the decision of making RefStack a project of its own
19:39:31 <hogepodge> catherineD: that's also a possibility
19:39:57 <rockyg> Hmm.  Interesting proposition (my ++ was for hogepodge's comment)
19:40:32 <catherineD> rockyg: do you have other thoughts?
19:40:57 <rockyg> Well.  Not on this topic, but something that may affect Refstack in the future...
19:41:13 <catherineD> rockyg: please share your thoughts
19:41:28 <rockyg> Eglute and I attended a "Dovetail" OPNFV meeting a couple of weeks ago.
19:41:53 <rockyg> They are the queivalent of InteropWG+ for OPNFV
19:42:07 <rockyg> They are using OpenStack as a model for their efforts.
19:42:41 <rockyg> I wanted to, in a future meeting, demo Refstack and how it works and that it can take other test sets as input
19:43:07 <rockyg> If they did their own testclient, they could use Refstack.......I think
19:43:54 <rockyg> We could get some new blood in the project and Refstack, still taking priority with OpenStack, could become the cert test server for lots of Open Source
19:44:03 <catherineD> rockyg: they can still use RefStack server (the reporting part ...)
19:44:39 <hogepodge> rockyg: ++
19:44:43 <rockyg> We just need them to decide it's worthwhile to contribute.  And, yup, the server can handle their test results :-)
19:44:44 <catherineD> rockyg: ++
19:45:02 <luzC> rockyg: ++
19:45:53 <sslypushenko_> rockyg:  ++
19:46:15 <rockyg> So, we should setup a meeting with the right set of folks to talk about Refstack architecture. and do a demo.  Demo could be done in their general meeting (7am PST on Thursdays, I think)
19:46:29 <rockyg> But, the tech stuff could be arranged separately.
19:47:25 <rockyg> Lemme get back in touch with them and see what we can set up.  If I can get them to join a RefStack IRc, could we do the demo and do a conference call meeting?
19:48:03 <catherineD> rockyg: sure .. we can also do a demo on their meeting if that would get more attendee
19:48:09 <catherineD> from their side
19:48:14 <hogepodge> rockyg: I have a zoom account we can use
19:48:48 <rockyg> Yup.  I'll get the info out this week.  I'll post to interopwg ML, dev and user-committee when I have OPNFV info.
19:48:57 <rockyg> Thanks, hogepodge !
19:49:34 <rockyg> That's it for me for now.
19:50:05 <catherineD> rockyg: great ...thanks...
19:51:39 <catherineD> anything else?
19:52:13 <catherineD> if not, let's end the meeting ...
19:52:18 <catherineD> thank you all ...
19:52:24 <rockyg> Thanks all!
19:52:27 <luzC> bye
19:52:30 <mguiney> have a good day, y'all!
19:52:32 <catherineD> #endmeeting