19:00:58 <catherineD> #startmeeting refstack
19:00:59 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jan 24 19:00:58 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:01:00 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:01:03 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack'
19:01:41 <pvaneck_> o/
19:02:19 <hogepodge> o/
19:02:28 <catherineD> #link meeting agenda and notes,  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-17-01-24
19:04:21 <luzC> o/
19:04:25 <catherineD> Alright let's start
19:04:47 <catherineD> agenda --> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-17-01-24
19:05:00 <sslypushenko_> o/
19:05:26 <catherineD> #topic Move environment related packages out of requirements.txt
19:06:36 <luzC> would you mind to elaborate on that one?
19:06:47 <catherineD> As we discussed last week, in order to support tox to check the  requirments file ... we may need to create a env-requirlemt file ... I did some test
19:07:05 <catherineD> and will send a patch after this meeting
19:07:41 <luzC> oh ok, sounds good
19:07:43 <sslypushenko_> I'd vote for separate dev-requirements.txt
19:08:12 <catherineD> sslypushenko_: greate
19:08:25 <catherineD> great :-)
19:08:56 <catherineD> next topic
19:09:12 <catherineD> any other thoughts before we move to the next topic?
19:09:43 <catherineD> alright moving on ...
19:09:45 <catherineD> #topic Implementation plan for customized guidelines
19:09:45 * garloff apologizes for poor network
19:10:20 <catherineD> This has always been a item that we plan to implement ...
19:10:35 <hogepodge> That's one of my working items, and we're presenting it to the board today
19:10:39 <catherineD> it just that the vendor and product registration has higher priority
19:11:30 <catherineD> My question is do we still want to do that ... but with hogepodge: statement .. I guess we do?
19:11:42 <garloff> I like it
19:13:03 <catherineD> originally we want to base the implementation on Andrey's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310621/  ... but he had abandoned that ..
19:13:10 <hogepodge> catherineD: vendor and product registration?
19:13:31 <garloff> Customized interop test (DefCore plus XXx) with XXx meaning that tool XXx will likely work
19:13:33 <luzC> that review is for defcore project to add a new json schema right?
19:13:46 <catherineD> hogepodge: that code was available since December 9 , 2016 on refstack,org ..
19:13:49 <hogepodge> catherineD: I think sorting out new guideline format is higher priority
19:14:09 <hogepodge> Ok, I misunderstood.
19:14:39 <hogepodge> catherineD: We still want to have a more flexible schema that allows for a broader collection of guidelines, and offer the ability to compose them
19:15:40 <catherineD> I am not sure vendor has used the vendor and product registration feature yet .. but we need foundation to mark the test as verified for data retention purpose ..
19:16:07 <catherineD> hogepodge: ok I take that we still want customized guideline ..
19:16:14 <catherineD> luzC: yes ..
19:16:32 <hogepodge> Here's the board report https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MFotmauuwZXmmhiTj_iyzUIOcTZA1V8JXgPk8Lqdc-4/edit, last section before the appendices
19:16:57 <hogepodge> correct link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MFotmauuwZXmmhiTj_iyzUIOcTZA1V8JXgPk8Lqdc-4/edit?usp=sharing
19:18:50 <catherineD> hogepodge: great .. so I will add this as an item for the PTG ...
19:19:19 <catherineD> that is all we need to know at this meeting whether it is still what we want to implement and the answer is "yes"  ..
19:19:31 <catherineD> we can discuss more on how to  next ..
19:19:40 <hogepodge> catherineD: thanks
19:20:18 <catherineD> hogepodge: yw
19:20:46 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:20:52 <catherineD> #topic Pending reviews
19:21:25 <catherineD> #link     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410443/ ( Added tox target which checks requirements.txt )
19:22:01 <catherineD> luzC: as discuss earlier, I will send a patch to split out the env-requirement ... then we can merge this patch ..
19:22:21 <luzC> yes, sounds good
19:23:04 <catherineD> #link     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419178/ ( Add ability to auto-associate tests )
19:23:07 <sslypushenko_> catherineD:  ping me in email please, we you ready
19:23:44 <catherineD> sslypushenko_: will do
19:23:51 <catherineD> please review ...
19:24:59 <luzC> I'll take a look later today
19:25:00 <luzC> :)
19:25:11 <catherineD> thx
19:27:08 <catherineD> #topic     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390881/ ( Change doc references from DefCore to Interop Working Group )
19:27:56 <luzC> probably I should -1 since I changed some git references so patch should land until git repo is changed to interop-wg ...
19:28:43 <luzC> reviews are welcome too at this point
19:28:53 <catherineD> luzC: I think the decision has been made to use �OpenStack Powered (TM) Guidelines� as the guideline name
19:29:09 <catherineD> ok I will add a comment on the patch ...
19:29:33 <luzC> yes, and I think I also implement the change already on patch 2, but I'll double check
19:30:34 <catherineD> ok everyone please review this patch ... since DefCore renames to Interop WG is now official ..
19:31:23 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:31:25 <luzC> I'll work also on the refstack-client patch (change a couple of references there)
19:31:37 <catherineD> #link    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422348/ (  Remove support for py33  )
19:31:45 <catherineD> luzC: thanks!
19:33:11 <pvaneck_> this patch looks fine. and yea, can probably look into adding a tox env to run function tests in 3.4 or 3.5
19:33:13 <luzC> I reviewed it looks good just after reviewing it I was wondering if we should start testing/add py35... and also not sure if we should add py34-func-mysql tox environment?
19:33:44 <luzC> pvaneck_ agree
19:34:07 <catherineD> pvaneck_: so let's looking into testing  3.4 and 3.5 before we merge this patch ...
19:34:28 <pvaneck_> seems unit tests are currently being run with 3.5
19:35:40 <catherineD> yea  so adding 3.5 to RefStack tox make sense ?
19:36:00 <catherineD> may be skipping 3.4 ?
19:36:54 <sslypushenko_> catherineD:  Looks like you are right
19:37:08 <pvaneck_> yea, thats probably fine
19:37:29 <catherineD> alright  .. moving on ..
19:37:38 <sslypushenko_> python  3.4 is too old =)
19:37:47 <catherineD> #link     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419271/ (  Use upper-constraints for tox envs )
19:38:20 <sslypushenko_> That is awesome !
19:39:58 <catherineD> do you think we need this?
19:40:23 <catherineD> it does not seems to break or hurt us?
19:40:29 <luzC> I don't think we need them, I need to double check
19:41:14 <catherineD> luzC: thanks!
19:42:12 <catherineD> we will do it if it is common OpenStack requirement or practice
19:43:14 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:43:33 <catherineD> #topic Open discussion
19:45:40 <sslypushenko_> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410283/
19:46:04 <sslypushenko_> We really need this patch
19:46:37 <sslypushenko_> In order to keep test coverage in good health
19:47:34 <catherineD> sslypushenko_: thanks for submitting the patch ...
19:48:00 <catherineD> everyone please review ....
19:49:08 <sslypushenko_> it is pretty old one, but it is still actual
19:49:29 <catherineD> thanks for bringing this to our attention
19:50:49 <pvaneck_> +1 will be a good check to have
19:51:25 <catherineD> we all should review and +1 for the RefStack team
19:51:44 <catherineD> pvaneck_: agree
19:51:51 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:52:10 <catherineD> RefStack will have a 1/2 day session at PTG ...
19:52:29 <catherineD> Please add PTG topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RefStackInteropWGAtlantaPTG:
19:53:20 <catherineD> anything else to discuss?
19:54:27 <catherineD> hearing nothing.  I think we can close up for the day  ...
19:54:37 <catherineD> thank you all for attending ...
19:54:49 <catherineD> bye everyone
19:55:01 <catherineD> #endmeeting