19:00:41 <catherineD> #startmeeting refstack 19:00:41 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Apr 4 19:00:41 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:42 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:00:45 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack' 19:02:00 <pvaneck> o/ 19:03:10 <catherineD> pvaneck: hi 19:03:25 <catherineD> #link meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-04-04 19:06:49 <catherineD> Let's start 19:07:04 <catherineD> #topic RefStack Newton summit discussion topics 19:07:07 <sslypushenko> o/ 19:07:29 <catherineD> meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-04-04 19:07:34 <catherineD> sslypushenko: hi 19:08:10 <catherineD> I create a link so we can put the refstack topics for discussion at Austin 19:08:20 <catherineD> #link Please add your topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-newton-summit 19:09:18 <catherineD> For the speaker session I create this https://goo.gl/S69Nte 19:09:29 <andrey-mp> hi! 19:09:58 <catherineD> andrey-mp: meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-04-04 19:10:22 <catherineD> andrey-mp: Hi, will you be at the summit? 19:11:03 <andrey-mp> catherineD: yeah, we will there with Alex 19:12:17 <catherineD> great so we have an overlaps between RefStack and EC2 at 11:00 - 11:40 19:13:20 <catherineD> if you and Alex are planning to attend the RefStack ... we will have to move the topics that you are interesting in to RefStack earlier session 19:13:35 <andrey-mp> (I don't know the schedule yet) 19:14:32 <andrey-mp> I can talk with Alexabout our plans - but I think its very early to us to make such decisions ) 19:14:43 <catherineD> I know EC2 has 2 working session on Wed from 11:00 - 12:30 19:15:12 <catherineD> RefStack has 3 sessions on Wed from 9:00 - 11:40 19:15:34 <catherineD> so we overlap on 11:00 - 11:40 slots 19:15:48 <andrey-mp> I think that we will try to be on RefStack sessions 19:16:15 <catherineD> anyway could you add topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-newton-summit 19:16:28 <catherineD> moving on 19:16:33 <andrey-mp> sure 19:16:42 <catherineD> #topic Make puppet pull releases from Pypi 19:16:52 <andrey-mp> review has merged 19:17:15 <pvaneck> finally merged yep :) 19:17:27 <catherineD> yup finally :-) 19:17:59 <catherineD> so the restack.openstack.org website is finally update to with the RefStack repository 19:18:09 <andrey-mp> really? 19:18:18 <catherineD> pvaneck: thanks for keeping working with infra on this 19:18:31 <catherineD> andrey-mp: yes we are at version 1.0.3 19:18:36 <andrey-mp> cool 19:18:36 <sslypushenko> pvaneck: Great job! 19:19:14 <andrey-mp> but do you have a link to pypi website to RefStack package? 19:19:36 <pvaneck> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/refstack 19:20:08 <andrey-mp> thanks! search didn't show me this package 19:20:10 <pvaneck> not sure why refstack doesnt show up when you search 'refstack' though 19:20:40 <pvaneck> yea, I wonder if there is a setting to make it searchable or something 19:21:01 <catherineD> pvaneck: let's look into that .. 19:21:45 <catherineD> pvaneck: thanks again for the pypi work .. this is an importnat milestone for RefStack 19:21:50 <catherineD> moving on ? 19:22:04 <pvaneck> yep 19:22:07 <catherineD> #topic Vendor registation 19:22:16 <andrey-mp> another question - why so many tags? :) I thought that we will implement/test some functionality and then tag the release 19:23:08 <catherineD> andrey-mp: 1.0.1 is the first test of tag .. 19:23:28 <andrey-mp> yes ) 19:23:37 <catherineD> 1.0.2 is a tag that we want to release some of the user request features like get test list ... 19:23:46 <andrey-mp> ah, ok ) 19:23:58 <catherineD> 1.0.3 is a test of the puppet patch 19:24:05 <andrey-mp> I'got your point 19:24:17 <andrey-mp> lt's move 19:25:35 <catherineD> andrey-mp: Alex said that you were busy until April ... do you have time for vendor registration implementation? you have most of the code already .. 19:26:13 <andrey-mp> I think that I have some time to do it 19:26:42 <catherineD> andrey-mp: that is really great ... thank you ... 19:26:59 <andrey-mp> and I want to say you - can I extract code of vendors UI or its better to implement REST API of product/software registration? 19:27:14 <andrey-mp> ops - ask you ) 19:27:19 <andrey-mp> not say, sorry ) 19:27:39 <catherineD> I think it is best to implement the REST API for vendor registration first 19:28:00 <catherineD> pvaneck: sslypushenko: your thoughts? 19:28:36 <catherineD> for product registration we need the spec to merge first 19:28:48 <andrey-mp> yeah, you are right. we merged user management API but not vendors API 19:28:59 <catherineD> #link product registration spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292526/ 19:29:14 <sslypushenko> catherineD: agreed 19:29:23 <andrey-mp> ok, I'll make review for vendors API next days 19:29:44 <catherineD> the spec for vendor registration already merged 19:30:14 <catherineD> #link vendore registation spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274837/ merged Mar 3 19:30:32 <catherineD> so we can start the implementation of vendor registration 19:30:52 <andrey-mp> and then what we want more - vendors UI or product REST API? 19:31:15 <andrey-mp> (after approving the spec for products) 19:32:21 <catherineD> so I see 4 implementation patches 1) vendor registation 2) product registration 3) vendor UI 4) product UI 19:32:53 <catherineD> of course we have to do 1 first 19:32:59 <andrey-mp> in the same sequence? 19:33:12 <catherineD> not necessary ... 19:33:14 <andrey-mp> ok 19:34:45 <catherineD> UI may take a long time to discuss so I think after 1 ... if you can do 2 and 3 together (different patches) if possible 19:35:06 <andrey-mp> I'll try :) 19:35:31 <catherineD> we need to have vendor registration so at least to on board funcdation member so we can start talking about archiveing data 19:36:16 <catherineD> we have more and more data now on the website that need to be removed or archive soon .. 19:36:29 <catherineD> andrey-mp: thank you very much! 19:36:37 <andrey-mp> my current UI implementation for vendors still there - http://52.49.129.72:8000/ 19:37:05 <catherineD> andrey-mp: great ! 19:37:49 <catherineD> #action catherineD: sslypushenko: pvaneck: to review UI on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292526/ for next week discusion 19:38:10 <catherineD> sorry wron link 19:38:42 <catherineD> #action the UI link is http://52.49.129.72:8000/ 19:39:12 <sslypushenko> heh, very reach UI), cool! 19:39:39 <catherineD> andrey-mp: it is good that we have a sample to review ... 19:39:43 <catherineD> moving on 19:39:55 <catherineD> #topic Pending reviews 19:40:12 <catherineD> #link Handle the cases guideline download failure with Test list download https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296985/ 19:40:41 <catherineD> andrey-mp: sslypushenko: could you please review ... I think this patch is ready to be merged 19:41:04 <sslypushenko> merged) 19:41:26 <catherineD> sslypushenko: lightening fast !!!!!! :-) 19:41:33 <catherineD> sslypushenko: ++++ 19:41:39 <catherineD> :-) 19:41:50 <catherineD> #link Add/refactor functional API tests https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300273/ 19:42:11 <catherineD> this one is also ready for merging ... 19:42:48 <catherineD> next 19:42:52 <catherineD> #link REST API spec to retrieve DefCore Guideline files and test lists https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829/ 19:43:18 <catherineD> andrey-mp: I answer to your question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829/ 19:43:33 <sslypushenko> I'll review last patch today 19:43:54 <sslypushenko> refactor patch looks ready to merge 19:44:25 <catherineD> sslypushenko: yep I think the refactor patch is ready to merge tooo 19:44:43 <andrey-mp> catherineD: yeah, I saw you answer. 19:44:58 <catherineD> andrey-mp: any input? 19:45:08 <catherineD> suggestion? 19:45:34 <andrey-mp> only +1 right now ) 19:46:05 <catherineD> this patches is mostly for DefCore there are so many aliases tests names added ...so dynamically that a static list will require a lot of maintenant 19:46:15 <andrey-mp> I think that we will have bug discussion later - when we will add new guidelines 19:46:30 <catherineD> andrey-mp: yes agreed 19:46:42 <andrey-mp> bug->big 19:47:20 <catherineD> andrey-mp: it makes a good topic for the f-2-f at the summit ... 19:47:42 <andrey-mp> yeah :) 19:48:07 <catherineD> that is all the topics I have for today ... 19:48:17 <catherineD> #topic Open discussion 19:49:49 <catherineD> sslypushenko: are you OK with the topic arrangement of speaker in https://goo.gl/S69Nte 19:50:09 <sslypushenko> catherineD: yeap) perfect) 19:50:34 <catherineD> great 19:51:04 <catherineD> anything else to discuss? 19:51:26 <sslypushenko> catherineD: Do you know what time our presentation will take place? 19:52:03 <catherineD> It is Monday at 11:15 -- 11: 55 19:52:19 <sslypushenko> thx! 19:52:21 <pvaneck> right after the keynotes 19:52:47 <pvaneck> nice to get it out of the way the first day 19:52:54 <catherineD> pvaneck: ++ 19:53:22 <catherineD> sslypushenko: andrey-mp: so glat that we will meet in person 19:54:02 <catherineD> that is all for today 19:54:14 <catherineD> we can end 5 mins early ... 19:54:56 <sslypushenko> + 19:54:58 <catherineD> Thank you all! 19:55:16 <catherineD> #endmeeting