19:00:07 #startmeeting refstack 19:00:08 Meeting started Mon Jul 6 19:00:07 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'refstack' 19:00:35 Roll call 19:00:43 o/ 19:00:55 o/ 19:01:32 hello pvaneck: Rockyg: 19:01:50 hey catherine 19:01:51 davidlenwell: won't be able to attend today's meeting ... 19:03:09 Hey. If I don't respond quickly, it's cause I am on two meetings at once. Just Ping me 19:03:20 Rockyg: sure .. 19:03:38 o/ 19:03:51 hi sslypushenko__: 19:04:05 Let's start 19:04:31 o/ 19:04:40 Today's agenda: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-15-07-06 19:05:02 #topic Relocate RefStack Project 19:06:08 davidlenwell: is going to take us to the next step on this ... but he is not here ... so I guess we will defer this to next week ? 19:06:45 #topic refstack.net site 19:07:21 David got a bill for $187 for refstack.net ... that is a lot for him to pay ... 19:09:06 hogepodge: is it possible to ask the Foundation to sponsor (to reimburse davidlenwell: ) ? 19:09:09 that is for one month? 19:09:15 yes 19:09:34 I take it back ... I am not sure ... 19:09:43 at least it is since May ... 19:11:04 catherineD: checking 19:11:17 hogepodge: thank you ... 19:14:11 Let's check back with hogepodge: later ... on to the next topic 19:14:32 #topic Infra Hosting 19:16:01 Thank's to hogepodge: davidlenwell: and krotscheck: ... we are now waiting for infra deployment ... 19:16:13 woo. 19:16:36 Woo2! 19:17:37 krotscheck: any idea how long ... it will take infra to deploy? 19:17:40 fungi: or anyone else, let us know how to move forward to get it up (see previous topic) 19:18:13 oh, right-o 19:18:28 someone was going to write a puppet module 19:18:31 fungi: lmk if you run into puppet issues. 19:18:46 can't remember if i've reviewed it yet 19:18:48 looking 19:18:49 fungi: openstack-infra/puppet-refstack 19:18:50 fungi: krotscheck just had that module merged as a project 19:19:16 aha, yup. so if there's not a change to openstack-infra/system-config to add a server for that yet, i'll add one 19:19:18 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182437/ 19:22:38 #action if there is not a change to openstack-infra/system-config, fungi: will add a server 19:22:54 #topic Set up eavesdrop for refstack channel 19:24:15 just needs approval at this point 19:24:49 Thanks you hogepodge: f (#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198621/) 19:25:06 #topic OpenStackID integration 19:26:29 sslypushenko__: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176335/ was merged finally ... 19:26:42 Yeah) 19:26:58 My work on endpoint for upload pubkeys is in progress 19:27:25 I expect to finish it this week 19:27:29 lots of work from sslypushenko__: and Vladislav ... Thank you so much ... 19:27:46 sslypushenko__: that is great ... 19:28:10 Great thx to Vlad. He did a lot for that patch) 19:28:31 sslypushenko__: ++ 19:29:11 that is really a milestone for us ... now we can proceed to the next phases of Refstack .. 19:29:26 Now, it feels like refstack needs one extra developer) 19:29:49 sslypushenko__: agree 19:30:45 I 19:31:38 But now we have extra QA, and our progress in tempest related issues is really great. But it is not related to this topic) 19:32:33 I think we can move to the next item 19:33:08 sorry ... I have contacted a few people that I had met at Vancouber for contribution ,,, will give update next week ... (Intel, Cononical , IBM ..) 19:33:37 #topic Use Refstack launchpad bugs & blueprints 19:34:03 We decided that Refstack project will not use StoryBoard during the May f-2-f meetings(agenda item 5) 19:34:48 seems that other people were already using https://bugs.launchpad.net/refstack for refstack related items 19:34:52 So we should start usong launchpad to submit bugs and blueprints ... 19:35:06 might as well use it for bugs/features we are working on 19:35:16 especially when adding new features 19:35:32 sounds good 19:35:40 right now only david is the bug supervisor 19:36:29 should we add all cores to be supervisor? 19:36:35 might be worthwhile to have him make a launchpad team that we are in, and have that team be the bug supervisor 19:36:40 that seems to be how other projects do it 19:37:41 ++ 19:37:44 + 19:37:50 #action davidlenwell: to add all Refstack core contributors as supervisor 19:38:49 while we are on this topic .. pvaneck: had submitted a refstack bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/refstack/+bug/1470252 19:38:49 Launchpad bug 1470252 in refstack "Pass percentage should take into account flagged tests" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Paul Van Eck (pvaneck-z) 19:39:15 Rockyg: hogepodge: I think DefCore need to approve this ... 19:39:37 or at least review .. 19:40:12 catherineD: hmm. I'd rather see a pass/fail for defcore and percentage pass 19:40:29 without regard to flag. they're different things 19:41:24 hogepodge: right now it display DefCore "count pass"/ "count total" and percentage pass 19:42:26 hogepodge: without the flag tests ... I don't think any vendors pass the DefCore test ... 19:43:39 catherineD: yes, pass fail should be independent of percentage pass 19:43:59 pass/fail needs to take into account flag status, but percentage shouldn't 19:46:22 This item need more discussion ... right now with the test results data, we don't even know what OpenStack release the cloud is implementing so that the relevent specification should be applied 19:46:41 Le't discuss this item in #refstack ... 19:47:54 Will skip topic 7&8 for now, go on to topic 9 ... 19:48:03 is it OK? 19:48:56 + 19:48:58 go ahead 19:49:13 #topic Tokyo Refstack sessions 19:50:20 I think we need to submit a speaker session to update the community of the new features in Refstack (like OpenID log in ...) 19:50:38 +1 19:50:43 any suggestion for the tittle? 19:51:41 sslypushenko__: will you be at the Tokyo summit? 19:52:16 I'm not really sure in it) 19:52:26 Refstack 2.0: Secure and in the hands of the foundation??? 19:52:39 what if we put you as one of the speaker? 19:52:56 It is not affable to me to do it on my own 19:53:11 sslypushenko__: no no .. .there will be a few of us ... 19:53:11 In this case it may work) 19:53:24 Can you apply for travel support from the foundation? 19:53:25 Rockyg: thanks .. 19:53:54 Refstack 2.0: more features, more security, more Foundation 19:54:02 not affable - > not affordable 19:54:05 Rockyg: I like that ... 19:54:22 We should discuss it with Rob 19:54:55 He has a great experience in it 19:55:46 sslypushenko__: ok let's do that ... we will need to actively work on it .. .because the deadline is next week ... 19:56:01 oh 19:57:04 #action Refstack team will work on submitting a speaker session for Tokyo summit this week 19:57:45 3 mins to go ... we will have to defer topic 7 & 8 to next week .. 19:58:08 #topic Open discussions 19:58:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/198869 19:58:43 is the glue change we talked about earlier 19:58:57 needs review, but it's up at least 19:59:03 DefCore midcycle is July 29 - 30 .... We will decide on Refstack micycle after DefCore's ... 19:59:34 fungi: wow thank you for your super fast response !!! 19:59:46 o/ 19:59:48 well, hogepodge already did all the hard work ;) 19:59:49 we are out of time .... 20:00:19 #endmeeting