19:01:08 #startmeeting refstack 19:01:10 Meeting started Mon May 11 19:01:08 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is catherine_d|1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:01:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:01:13 The meeting name has been set to 'refstack' 19:01:15 o/ 19:01:24 o/ 19:01:25 o/ 19:01:26 Roll call 19:01:27 o/ 19:02:04 hi everyone ,,, 19:02:21 Today's agenda: 1) Recap demo to DefCore on May 6 2) Refstack team meeting at summit 3) Recap goals & action items for Vancouver 4) Decision on resrult output supports 5) Pending review 6) Open discussion 19:02:55 #topic Recap demo to DefCore on May 6 19:03:21 I recieved positive feedback from a few observers. 19:03:39 o/ 19:03:45 folks seemed to like that we demo'd the live site 19:04:02 vladiskuz|2: and sslypushenko__: I think you were in the demo right? 19:04:12 Yes 19:04:14 davidlenwell: that is great ! 19:04:32 o/ 19:04:45 Sound quality was not perfect, but I guess I understood almost everthing) 19:05:04 sslypushenko__: that is too bad! 19:05:59 anyone hears any other feedback from Refstack demo? 19:06:18 As far as I understood demo passed good, I'm I right? 19:06:48 I think it went well.. but what do I know? ;) 19:07:10 sslypushenko__: personally I think so .. 19:07:20 there was some confusion over the name of the site. some were looking for .org This got infra's attention. 19:07:47 davidlenwell: you might want to monitor traffic. 19:07:48 catherine_d|1 That is nice 19:08:39 I do not see a lot of data uploaded to refstack.net .... I wish that it would be more ... 19:08:42 we need data ... 19:08:45 I'll see if i can get some attention from infra. Wouldn't want to crash your vm duing the summit 19:08:50 Rockyg: I am 19:09:09 Rockyg: please do ... thanks! 19:09:09 we need foundation / defcore support to get data 19:09:43 I think hogepodge: help on this essential ... 19:09:44 I think it will happen when infra gets the .org up 19:09:54 Rockyg: ic ... 19:09:58 catherine_d|1: agreed 19:10:37 #action Startegy and plan to acttact more data upload .. 19:11:04 anything else on this topic before we move on ... 19:11:12 catherine_d|1: ok 19:11:54 hogepodge: thank you so much ... you are our center on topic #1 ... 19:12:20 #topic Refstack team meeting at summit 19:12:57 I'm booked monday, tuesday and friday after 10 am 19:13:27 how about Rockyg: hogepodge: ? 19:13:40 Tues or Friday? 19:14:37 I might have openings on wednesday. What about Friday breakfast? 19:14:59 davidlenwell: hogepodge: you ok for Friday breakfast? 19:15:08 catherine_d|1: should be 19:15:11 yes 19:15:19 great ! 19:15:26 MTW are my biggest days 19:15:39 hogepodge: understand ., 19:16:06 Yeah. Those days are bad. 19:16:19 #agreed Refstack team will have f-2-f meeting at breakfast Friday ... place TBD ... 19:16:24 great 19:16:54 #topic Recap goals & actions item for Vancouver 19:17:32 The Vancouver goals & action items are defined in #link Feb f2f link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack_f2f_feb_2015 Please check the "Action items basesd on priorities" section at the bottom of the page. 19:18:47 3 patches are in reviewing (by sslypushenko__: vladiskuz|2: and Paul )... expecting one more from Paul ... 19:19:44 I think we are very closed .. once we merge those we will achieve the goals that we set for Vancouver .. Thanks you everyone for all the hardwork !!! 19:20:11 close 19:20:19 catherine_d|1 Thanks you too! 19:20:34 catherine_d|1: yes, I am waiting fow for reviews 19:21:06 vladiskuz|2: I know that patch is a lot of hard work ... 19:21:09 vladiskuz|2: I got comments from Paul 19:21:27 I think it's time to push infra to review the webserver stuff. I'll get on infra IRC right after this meeting ends. 19:21:27 catherine_d|1: thanks :) 19:21:42 Rockyg: ++1 ... 19:22:15 our goals this week is to merge those review ... 19:23:26 #action Merge all outstanding reviews this week 19:23:31 so to be able to use the actual openstackid.org website, do you have to be approved to use it and registered with them? 19:24:01 they don't just give out subdomains 19:24:47 without the request coming from the foundation or the board its probably a no go 19:24:51 not sure what the process is to be able to use it. first step infra? 19:24:56 I don't think we can get it before vancouver ... this would be a good topic for our f2f? 19:25:06 davidlenwell: ++1 19:25:07 ++ 19:25:13 first step board/foundation 19:26:31 hogepodge: again you will be our advocate for foundation .... 19:27:31 hogepodge: sorry for keep putting more work on you plates ... I know you are extremely busy ... but we really need your help /// 19:28:28 #action Need confirmation on adoption from DefCore/foundation 19:28:54 any ohter thoughts? 19:29:11 catherine_d|1: you should go to breakfast with the board and lobby 19:29:14 can you paste the link to the review with this? 19:29:33 catherine_d|1: the biggest block for me is I don't have access to vm hosting directly, or changing domain name 19:29:39 I've asked, and I'll help as I can. 19:29:41 Rockyg: good idea let me do that 19:29:58 hogepodge: I am pretty sure we can work on that .... 19:30:52 doesn't the foundation own refstack.org now? 19:30:54 catherine_d|1: f2f is good, maybe we can rope in fungi too 19:31:08 davidlenwell: we own it, but I don't have access to modify the dns entry 19:31:19 who does? 19:31:33 we can just ask them to change it.. 19:31:34 #action Work on getting hogepodge: on refstack server 19:31:39 davidlenwell: I don't know. probably jonathan, maybe infra people 19:31:59 okay .. well we should just ask someone over there.. they are always helpful.. 19:32:10 do you want access to the current hosting? 19:32:13 yeah, i followed up on the ml thread last week about the domain name. it looks like it's already set up for us to start hosting it from our infra rackspace tenant 19:32:26 fungi: You know? ^^^ 19:32:28 I get the feeling from recent IRC discussions that the foundation owns their stuff and infra goes in and fixes it occansionally 19:32:30 catherine paul or myself can add your pub key to the server 19:32:31 fungi: great good news 19:32:31 the refstack.org domain name anyway 19:32:52 So, key is who is devops for foundation site? Website, ask.o.o, etc 19:33:20 fungi: I can pass ownership of refstack.net as well .. I only purchased it as a stop gap while piston was being slow about the transfer 19:33:24 it depends on what system. the www site is toddmorey and some contractors from a dev firm called "tipit" 19:33:30 #action add hogepodge: key to refstack.net 19:33:31 basically everything else is infra 19:34:28 is it tipit or tipbit? 19:35:30 Rockyg: tipit 19:35:49 Dang. I know the vp/prez at tipbit 19:37:11 let's target this topic (hosting refstack. org) at the f2f summit ... 19:37:49 hogepodge: meanwhile target is to add you to the refstack.net server ... 19:38:22 any other thoughts? 19:38:47 catherine_d|1: ok 19:39:04 let move on to the next topic ... 19:39:08 #topic Decision on resrult output supports 19:39:33 currently we have 2 outputs for the test results ... 19:40:09 http://api.refstack.net/output.html?test_id= and http://refstack.net/#/results/ 19:40:28 I like the second url better 19:40:37 We should use second one 19:40:40 I don't think we can support 2 and make sure that they are in sync ... 19:41:46 have to use the second one with the current ui 19:41:47 We will remove all stuff from refstack/static includes output.html 19:42:07 ++ 19:42:27 great ... 19:43:14 #agreed Refstack will render test results output with http://refstack.net/#/results/ 19:43:37 #topic Pending reviews 19:44:13 vladiskuz|2: 's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176335/ 19:45:03 sslypushenko__: 's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181128/ Use capabilities refstack endpoint 19:45:20 pvaneck: 's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181180/ Use Refstack API to get capabilities and versions 19:45:30 and sslypushenko__, we both ended up submitting patches for using the capabilities API. Though I was thinking of getting the list of versions to display in the drop down straight from the API. 19:45:54 pvaneck Your patch is better 19:46:03 I will drop mine 19:46:23 sslypushenko__: thank you !!!! 19:47:13 We should be proud of this team ... because there is one goal for us which is the sucessful of Refstack !!! 19:47:20 the only issue, I suppose, might be if they suddenly commit a new capability file to the defcore repo that uses a new schema 19:47:34 pvaneck: it's comint 19:47:36 coming 19:47:52 yea, so I want to prepare for the schema change 19:47:56 2014.04 and 03 will stay the same, but next will change 19:48:10 pvaneck: we will handle both? 19:48:23 won't it be versioned? 19:48:37 we will have to maintain backwards compatibility 19:49:10 if the capabilities have schema version inside the json, should be able to 19:49:55 "version": "1.0" or "version": "2.0" or something like that 19:50:20 hogepodge: is that possble? 19:50:51 that is adding a "version" field in the capability json .. 19:51:40 catherine_d|1: yes, we have a version field and will produce a schema 19:52:30 ah, i see it 19:52:51 great let's move one ... 19:53:00 #topic Open discussion 19:53:21 move on 19:54:08 I'm looking forward to seeing everyone next week.. 19:54:21 no no IRC next week? 19:54:36 def no IRC meeting 19:54:38 yes.. most of us will be busy 19:55:52 vladiskuz|2: will review you patch again ... as soon as you push a new one .... That is a lot of work ... thanks again!.. 19:56:18 catherine_d|1: thank you! 19:56:51 vladiskuz|2: sslypushenko__: will try to find a place so that you can attend the f2f .... 19:57:12 Thx 19:57:42 good meeting today ... THANK YOU! 19:57:44 #endmeeting