19:02:22 <davidlenwell> #startmeeting refstack
19:02:23 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Dec  8 19:02:22 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is davidlenwell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:02:24 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:02:26 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack'
19:02:30 <hogepodge> o/
19:04:20 <davidlenwell> usually folks are a few minutes late
19:07:33 <sslypushenko__> o/
19:07:40 <davidlenwell> here we go ..
19:09:06 <davidlenwell> let me ping catherine to see if she's coming
19:09:21 <hogepodge> and zehicle too
19:10:11 <davidlenwell> he's harder to nail down...
19:10:27 <sarob> lurking
19:12:19 <davidlenwell> hogepodge: we can start by talking about your list
19:12:30 <sslypushenko__> While we don't start I want to inform you that Mirantis team stops refstack development.
19:12:31 <hogepodge> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-08-12-14
19:12:50 <davidlenwell> sslypushenko__: as of now?
19:13:42 <sslypushenko__> Yes
19:13:50 <davidlenwell> thank you
19:13:54 <davidlenwell> for all your work
19:14:08 <sslypushenko__> Thanks you too)
19:14:33 <sslypushenko__> It was interesting activity
19:14:57 <sslypushenko__> I'm going to finish this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132583/
19:15:18 <sslypushenko__> It is on testing now
19:15:23 <davidlenwell> Awesome.. Thank you
19:16:27 <davidlenwell> its hard to do this meeting without responses from folks.. So I am going to drill through these reviews and leave comments here and in each one..
19:16:31 <davidlenwell> lets start with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121640/..
19:16:53 <davidlenwell> I don't think its going to be needed .. defcore could actually use the meta data in tests that we are working on adding.
19:17:10 <sslypushenko__> I improved setup_env script. It will be able to coose tag from tempest repository while refstack setup
19:17:26 <davidlenwell> So that core information is actually in each test .. so that developers know what they are looking at and what it effects without looking at the refstack repo
19:18:00 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102334/  next
19:18:26 <davidlenwell> the models have had to change drastically since then.. i'll get a commit in asap with the new version for review and abandon this one.
19:18:53 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125757/ .. actually thats this
19:19:05 <davidlenwell> its not merged because it will break the existing code ..
19:19:16 <davidlenwell> another commit will follow that will depend on this
19:19:55 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102930/ .. need to abandon .. decided to go a much different way with this.
19:20:29 <hogepodge> Can we do the abandons today or this week to clear out the backlog?
19:20:39 <davidlenwell> since we are removing the website completely from the refstack code.. it didn't make any sense to have two different applications here.. its all getting reworked with much less complexity.
19:20:48 <davidlenwell> yeah .. I'll do them nowish
19:21:25 <hogepodge> Even the code in flight for rendering test results? That looked like good and interesting work.
19:22:15 <davidlenwell> that code will remain but is part of a much larger puzzle
19:22:24 <davidlenwell> the existing admin code is all being removed
19:22:43 <davidlenwell> scorecard generation will remain as an api method
19:22:52 <hogepodge> ok, ty. Cool.
19:22:55 <davidlenwell> the output of which can be consumed by a website
19:23:23 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139499/ <-- I gave it a plus 2.. I want catherine to merge
19:24:13 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129320/ <-- I will review today
19:24:18 <davidlenwell> its not a small review
19:25:01 <davidlenwell> sslypushenko__: if I need changes to this can you still work on it ?
19:25:09 <hogepodge> That one takes a while. I also need to review again.
19:26:21 <davidlenwell> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118839/  <- I've given this a plus 2 as well .. lets get a review from catherine as well.
19:30:09 <davidlenwell> without the rest of the group here I don't know how much progress we can have..
19:30:34 <hogepodge> The meeting is a bit light, so we probably have to defer some topics until we have a larger group, but I'd like to talk about planning a timeline for testing and reporting. With the latest defcore board approval I think it very important to show data collection capabilities in the next couple of months.
19:30:55 <davidlenwell> I'd ask that members of the defcore commitee try to make an effort to show up now and then.. I know mondays suck for meetings
19:30:59 <hogepodge> We can defer it. Do we have a mailing list where we can publicize the meeting and get a better turnout?
19:31:10 <davidlenwell> fits
19:31:20 <davidlenwell> is the mailing list we inherited
19:31:39 <davidlenwell> I'm going to do some one on one promotions as well..
19:31:59 <hogepodge> Ok. Easily forgettable name with the other project names around.
19:32:14 <davidlenwell> we've talked about changing it a few times..
19:32:43 <hogepodge> I think it would be fruitful to have the refstack devs get together for a mid-cycle meetup to just hack on the code and get full end to end runs going.
19:32:43 <davidlenwell> can you be available today in #refstack
19:32:48 <sslypushenko__> Sure thing. I will support this two patches
19:32:51 <hogepodge> yes.
19:33:23 <davidlenwell> so lets be available to continue discussion with the group later as I can get them in the room
19:33:33 <davidlenwell> I'm all about a mid-cycle meetup
19:34:16 <hogepodge> Off the top of my head I'm thinking Portland or Austin. Those are the easiest cities for me to organize. I'm also open to anywhere else.
19:34:58 <davidlenwell> I'd like to get  christopher macgowan if we can
19:35:08 <catherind_d> hi Sorry I am late
19:35:11 <davidlenwell> We'd get a lot more IBM participation if we could keep it to the bay area
19:35:31 <davidlenwell> catherind_d: please read the backlog after we end meeting and join us in #refstack
19:35:41 <catherind_d> yes I will sorry
19:36:17 <davidlenwell> catherind_d: I was just saying that if we host a mid-cycle hacking session in the bay area say mid january you might be able to have more participatoin from your team.. more say than if we had to travel to portland or austin
19:36:41 <davidlenwell> Also rocky and I are local
19:37:06 <davidlenwell> there are also no shortage of companies with conference rooms we could ask to host us
19:37:14 <hogepodge> to bay area? that makes lots of sense then. Is it easy to get space to work in?
19:37:21 <davidlenwell> sure
19:37:22 <hogepodge> +1
19:38:20 <davidlenwell> I'd like to pull christopher macgowan into further discussion.. I've heard he's taking joshuas place on the defcore commitee or at least considering it.
19:38:21 <hogepodge> I have an unmovable commitment the week of January 19, but am free otherwise.
19:38:38 <davidlenwell> I'm busy that week too hogepodge.. it would have to be the week before
19:39:33 <davidlenwell> lets put choosing a date for the mid-cycle meetup on the agenda for next week.. I'll work on getting us some better attendance as well
19:39:54 <hogepodge> cool
19:40:19 <davidlenwell> okay lets break early and open discussion in #refstack to catch catherine up
19:40:37 <davidlenwell> #endmeeting