19:00:32 #startmeeting refstack 19:00:33 Meeting started Mon Oct 27 19:00:32 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is davidlenwell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'refstack' 19:00:58 Good afternoon. 19:01:04 good day 19:01:19 roll call 19:01:43 o/ 19:01:50 o/ 19:03:29 o/ 19:03:33 we'll let a few more folks filter in before starting 19:04:01 whois hogepodge? just curious 19:04:42 davidlenwell, Chris Hoge, I was just hired by the OpenStack Foundation as their Interop Engineer, which in part means DefCore/RefStack 19:04:44 hard to remember everyones nick 19:04:56 oh thats right we met t openstack silicon valley 19:05:21 o/ 19:05:26 good .. very glad to see you here.. welcome! 19:05:45 Thank you! It's exciting to be here. 19:06:21 okay .. lets just get started 19:06:58 #topic api 19:07:19 I am going to submit for review this afternoon the patch everyones been waiting for.. 19:07:39 davidlenwell: great 19:07:48 I've ended up refining the web service to not include all of the reporting features. 19:07:59 the event reporting I should say 19:08:32 without tests being triggered from the central database/api there isn't really a point in keeping track of the status of test runs 19:08:47 so look for that and review it .. 19:09:11 lets keep the review cycles fast.. I'd like to have this code hosted at api.refstack.org by thursday 19:09:33 davidlenwell: will we have an web site up? 19:09:37 yes 19:09:48 O/ 19:09:56 refstack.org will be up and api.refstack.org will host the api 19:10:17 davidlenwell: +1 .. 19:10:44 so hogepodge and catherine_d and sslypushenko__ I will tag you all as reviewers on the api code.. 19:11:10 next topic.. 19:11:20 sslypushenko__: have been working on the DefCore results page .. once the site is up we should host those page .. 19:11:20 #topic next weeks meeting 19:11:42 we obviously will not be having a meeting next week .. most of us will be in paris. 19:11:54 o/ lurking 19:11:57 I plan on getting as much facetime with all of you as possible. 19:12:51 I also plan on crashing several of the q/a track design sessions in order to push our agenda for uuid's on tests 19:13:03 DefCore results page can be used as a template for flask. So it will easy to intergrate it in refstack.org 19:13:04 catherine_d: you and I should coordinate on that 19:13:14 thank you sslypushenko__ 19:13:16 davidlenwell: do we have a time slot for UUID discussion 19:13:56 mtreinish (the tempest ptl) has told me he'll tollorate that being a topic for part of the track.. im not sure on the timing of it.. I'll try to coordinate with him accordingly 19:14:25 davidlenwell: well it's a bit too late for the qa track now, it's pretty much locked down 19:14:40 but we can discuss it during the friday contributor meetup 19:15:00 mtreinish: I might corner you in the dev lounch between tracks then .. 19:15:23 friday might be to late for the conversation to evolve into a solution before the end of the week 19:16:22 mtreinish: this is a very important topic for refstack ... because of the complexity of the topic , we should discuss early in the week 19:17:19 mtreinish: I'll ping you offline and we can work this out 19:17:34 davidlenwell: sure, although the advantage of friday is that it's all day 19:17:37 davidlenwell: ok sure 19:17:48 thank you mtreinish 19:17:58 lets move along 19:18:19 any pending reviews im missing? 19:18:30 #topic pending reviews 19:18:48 need a flow chart for the wiki page 19:19:15 +1 19:19:26 okay .. I've just writtent hat on my pre-travel list on my whiteboard 19:19:36 davidlenwell: thx 19:20:06 it will be part of the website content that I am working on anyways 19:20:24 refstack-client review is all update to date ... Paul is working on https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/188 19:20:53 sslypushenko__: are you working on https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/309? 19:21:58 I'm planing to do it tomorrow. I have been working on report page all week 19:22:09 sslypushenko__: +1 thx 19:22:24 Which is looking good. 19:22:43 thx 19:23:00 For refstrack , davidlenwell: zehicle_: please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129320/ rockyg: and I have reviewed 19:23:43 I think it is very close to final version 19:23:51 I don't want that merged just yet .. I just wanted in gerrit 19:24:57 if refstack.org is up ... this is one set of content that refstack.org can render .... 19:25:29 its not going to render anything yet 19:25:30 i mean the report from sslypushenko__: on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129320/ ... looks good to me .. 19:25:35 thats a k1 goal 19:26:03 right now we're focused on data collection 19:26:24 showing report cards might make it seem like we are expressing an opinion about how to run openstack 19:26:46 davidlenwell, we need to be able to show people how they are doing vs. the capabilities list 19:26:51 that's a Foundation request 19:27:00 that said we do want this .. and we do want to show rendered test results .. its just not a pre-paris requirment 19:27:01 we don't have to make them public - self review first 19:27:22 we do need to show them that we got all the data 19:27:28 davidlenwell: in any how we need some kind of demo so people can give feedback ... 19:27:38 sure 19:28:41 and like I said .. we sitll want this .. but as far as I understood from every previous converasation rendering of results wasn't a preparis feature 19:28:45 Maybe run tests against trystack as demo of the report? 19:29:02 rockyg: I think thats a tangent 19:29:05 lets stay on topic 19:29:16 rockyg, you need admin access to run the tests 19:29:32 Just want a filled report available to show in Paris 19:29:34 yes .. rockyg and zehicle thats true 19:29:37 davidlenwell, do we care if they run against Havana? 19:29:43 no we don't 19:29:47 I can provide some sample data 19:29:48 I'd expect that uploading any test results would be OK 19:29:50 everyone is still running havana 19:29:58 and those are the dependancies we have finalized anyways 19:30:01 ouch, ok 19:30:11 I guess I should put that Juno demo back on the shelf 19:30:23 perheps 19:30:55 again the tester doesn't care what version your running 19:31:08 branchless tempest should test juno just as well as it tests havana 19:31:09 it seems like the #1 thing to demo is that someone can upload tempest results 19:31:10 zehicle: we need Icehouse before Juno? 19:31:11 or icehouse 19:31:16 and we're only collecting the results 19:31:25 so I don't care what version of the cloud you run the test results against 19:32:19 A juno demo may not be a bad idea. Havana is not officially supported upstream any more. 19:32:49 that said .. sslypushenko__ do you have the bandwidth this week to connect that template to some real data.. catherine_d can provide you with sample data to write the code with. 19:33:05 sure 19:33:15 hogepodge: I'll leave that up to someone on defcore 19:33:52 Just ping me in email 19:33:59 at this point it's about proving the API not the version of OpenStack 19:34:03 catherine_d: can you email him some real results 19:34:11 davidlenwell: sure 19:34:13 zehicle: +1000000 19:34:25 catherine_d: thanks 19:34:30 i'd like to see if people can get their own tests working as part of this 19:34:47 I can incorporate it in a minute 19:34:47 well I have bluebox trying to start using the refstack client right now 19:35:11 the hold up right now is that they were not generating configs durring deployment for tempest 19:35:23 and won't be for a little while 19:35:34 so our test engineer is having to step through getting a working config 19:36:11 So .. prerequisit when we are pushing that folks run the client is that we make it clear that they have to write the tempest config themselves 19:36:21 No pain, no gain) 19:36:41 indeed 19:36:43 to clarify ... I do not have havana data ... I only have IceHouse data ... 19:37:06 thats fine 19:37:09 render it with icehouse data 19:37:46 sslypushenko__: 's code renders the results with havanacore 19:38:03 Yep 19:38:06 and we do note have icehousecore.json yet 19:38:26 so we will render Icehouse data with havanacore.json? 19:38:27 unfortunately( 19:38:44 Yes but the tests will work for . Backward compatibility demo:-) 19:38:52 sslypushenko__: can you make a version of the template that doesn't compare it to the json and doesn't assign a score? 19:39:08 For ice house 19:39:19 I just want a raw output view 19:39:24 that doesn't have an opinion 19:39:28 rockyg: tests are compatible but criteria is not ... 19:39:39 Comparing to capabilities - it is a main feature 19:39:55 again the criteria in question is based on defcore and not any other sense of reality 19:40:04 But raw output avaible to 19:40:12 start with raw output 19:40:12 ++ David 19:40:18 in a readable fashion 19:40:37 davidlenwell: take a look at http://sergslipushenko.github.io/output_demo.html ... that would be the plain list in thos page 19:40:51 Sorry. Doing this on phone. Auto correct sucks for IRC 19:41:36 Havana vote should be mostly s subset of ice house 19:42:06 we have to keep in mind that refstack and defcore are very different things 19:42:19 no exactly 19:42:25 zehicle: this just mena that we need an icehousecore.json fast ? 19:43:03 no exactly.. but mostly 19:43:08 refstack is to test for interopability .. our results output should show the capabilies but not use the word "core" at all 19:43:14 so we need approved havana first 19:43:28 I'm fine with defcore also having pages to render with scores 19:43:39 but we cannot have one before the other 19:44:40 davidlenwell: http://sergslipushenko.github.io/output_demo.html can also show all if the "Show only core tests" check box is not checked 19:44:59 thats the problem I am having with the language on the page 19:45:16 I'll review the page and put down my opinions 19:45:23 davidlenwell: +1 19:45:24 it will be easier to understand and cleaer 19:45:32 moving on .. anything else ? 19:45:50 juliashapovalova: what else do you need for the wiki page? 19:46:16 for now it has outdated diagrans 19:46:25 and 3 brocken lincks 19:46:41 couple for Rob's docs and refstack.org 19:46:57 that's it 19:47:03 creating those diagrams is on my list for this week 19:47:12 David promissed to take care on the flow chart 19:47:14 I'll share links to them in #refstack 19:47:24 thanks! 19:47:36 rockyg: will you be able to review the broken links? 19:47:38 after I get the api out tonight I'll be free to focus on message and all that 19:48:30 I'm actually really excited about designing and building a website and all the assets 19:49:03 juliashapovalova: I will upload the new_havanacore.json ... you can review and update with the comments you send in the note earlier today so we have the log in review 19:49:43 great 19:49:45 Removed some broken links. 19:49:53 one more thing regarding the capabilities: I did one commit for icehouse capabilities (it contains only new projects - to start reviews) please review it 19:50:26 juliashapovalova: I will 19:50:47 thank you 19:51:00 We need to move all reference docs into Openstack and out of Google 19:51:02 final review of the core file will be from zehicle: 19:51:18 yy 19:51:31 ++ 19:51:38 zehicle: will ping when we are already for your review 19:51:51 +1 19:51:51 let me know when ready 19:53:02 zehicle: juliashapovalova: and I will do that ... 19:53:57 great 19:54:11 okay .. we're running out of time. 19:54:35 any final thoughts? 19:54:36 I have an idea for demo - if David is concerning regardine the "core" list - we can use just full capabilities 19:54:51 juliashapovalova: +1 19:54:58 it could be generated automaticaly for half an hour 19:55:33 +1 19:56:00 okay .. lets end this .. 19:56:09 ping me in #refstack if anything is needed 19:56:16 #endmeeting