14:02:36 #startmeeting Rally 14:02:36 Meeting started Mon Aug 17 14:02:36 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is boris-42. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:02:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:02:40 The meeting name has been set to 'rally' 14:02:49 :) 14:03:05 ping kun_huang: rvasilets oanufriev redixin ikhudoshyn 14:03:09 orz 14:03:13 o/ 14:03:24 hiyo 14:03:36 hi 14:04:01 hi 14:04:09 yingjun: hi 14:04:14 hi 14:04:19 #topic Todays Meeting Agenda 14:04:35 Okay seems like today we don't have too much to discuss 14:04:48 * boris-42 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Next_meeting 14:05:04 If you would like to add something new you are welcome 14:05:13 Okay let's move to first topic 14:05:23 #topic [kun_huang] [short news] chinese openstack hackathon 14:05:30 It's a short news 14:05:46 There is a meetup in this week, openstack hackathon (china) 14:05:57 we're going to fix some bugs 14:06:03 there are nova/neutron guys 14:06:14 and I'm fixing rally bugs 14:06:43 kun_huang: great thanks 14:06:55 so, next week, there will be a report for it, which contain rally fixed bugs 14:07:06 hope all guys know this 14:07:45 and if you would like to assign easy bugs to me, it's welcome 14:07:52 that's all :) 14:08:05 kun_huang: ok =) 14:08:33 kun_huang: moving to next topic? 14:08:39 no problem 14:08:45 #topic [rvasilets] 'rally task abort' now is green! Welcome to review. 14:11:03 hm looks like topic is selfcontaining) 14:11:16 ikhudoshyn: ya seems like so 14:11:16 =) 14:11:23 rvasilets: do you have anything to add it? 14:11:29 ok we'll review. move on? 14:12:04 ikhudoshyn: waiting for rvasilets answer... 14:13:01 okay seems like rvasilets is not online.. 14:13:16 #topic [boris-42] Switching Scenario to plugin base 14:13:42 Okay guys I would like just to explain better what and why we are doing 14:13:49 recently we get merged first patch 14:14:04 I have returned 14:14:17 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212831/ 14:14:27 rvasilets: to late my dear friend=) 14:14:44 typing 14:14:53 rvasilets: it's another topic 14:15:15 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212831/ 14:15:16 sorry, continue) 14:15:59 Inside this patch we changed scenario scenario() decorator to configure() to unify with other types of plugins 14:16:23 + moved module with base plugin 14:16:42 in next patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213631/ I am finishing this work 14:17:24 and unifying Scenario with other plugin bases (making it subclass of Plugin) 14:17:25 another big patch 14:17:41 kun_huang: yep because we have to change all scenario plugins 14:17:58 kun_huang: now we have to specify explicit name of scenario 14:18:58 so after this patch we will be able to do few next things 14:19:11 1) common deprecation mechanism for all types of plugisn 14:19:33 2) common (scenario like) validation mechanism for all types of plugins 14:19:45 3) common info mechanism 14:19:54 common types mechanism 14:20:10 and replace a bunch of bad code from rally engine/framework 14:20:18 that's all any questions? 14:21:51 kun_huang: rvasilets ikhudoshyn amaretskiy redixin ^ 14:22:01 not from my side 14:22:02 no questions 14:22:13 About rally task abort review. There is only one place that need to have attention https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161636/57/rally/common/db/sqlalchemy/api.py Function in 142 line could be wrote in several ways. I choose this one. If you have great ideas please comment. eom 14:22:35 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161636/57/rally/common/db/sqlalchemy/api.py 14:23:15 rvasilets: thanks anything about current topic? 14:23:45 okay moving to next topic 14:23:59 #topic [boris-42] Where is 0.1.0 release? 14:24:02 So 14:24:21 We need to switch to plugin base scenarios and implement task aborts 14:24:29 I believe these are 2 most important topics 14:24:44 One more important is to switch to new reports 14:24:59 somebody has some other ideas? 14:26:00 new reports sounds good, I'm currently working fixing issues reported in comments https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146814/ 14:26:18 I believe there will be new patch set soon 14:26:25 amaretskiy: ok great 14:27:41 okay seems like we discussed everything 14:27:47 see you next week 14:27:52 wait) 14:28:01 wait pls 14:28:06 ikhudoshyn: ok 14:28:49 I have no questions 14:28:53 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211160/ nothing to discuss really. Just wanted to address A.Kurilin question. This patch is needed by ongoing work.. 14:29:26 to use newer task format. 14:29:51 ikhudoshyn: so you can describe that inside commit message 14:29:59 The patch is separated to reduce pain of reviewing/merging/rebasing etc 14:30:08 ikhudoshyn: it will be useful for other reviewers as well 14:30:16 make sense 14:30:19 eom 14:30:54 ikhudoshyn: okay 14:31:08 #topic open discussion 14:31:15 does somebody have something to disucss? 14:31:21 no 14:31:23 no 14:31:25 no 14:31:26 no 14:31:40 okay let's finish meeting 14:31:42 #endmeeting