17:34:54 #startmeeting quantum-tempest 17:34:55 Meeting started Thu Sep 20 17:34:54 2012 UTC. The chair is nati_ueno. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:34:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:34:57 is this works? 17:34:58 The meeting name has been set to 'quantum_tempest' 17:35:13 oh its works! This is useful 17:35:36 #info Current discussion summary http://etherpad.openstack.org/quantum-tempest 17:36:24 Ok I wanna talk about testing tool until waiting zyluo's update 17:36:33 #topic testing tool 17:36:53 mnewby: I wanna hear your idea about quantum-debug command 17:40:44 what does that command do? 17:41:17 and where is it going to be located? Tempest or Quantum 17:41:18 It create port for test. 17:41:19 https://github.com/openstack/quantum/tree/master/quantum/debug 17:41:36 ic i'll take a look 17:41:39 We can test connectibility without VM 17:41:48 oh cool 17:42:28 It uses namespace function, so each testing environments are isolated 17:42:36 zyluo: Thanks 17:44:52 hmm it looks mnewby isn't here. 17:44:59 sorry, i'm on a call... 17:45:08 mnewby: Oh I got it :) 17:45:59 Then we can also extend this to test isolation, right? 17:46:21 nati_euno: ok, done 17:46:26 May I ask meaning of test isolation? 17:46:45 mnewby: k 17:46:51 can you please ask your question of me again? 17:47:15 OK In previous meeting, you said something is needed to quantum-debug command 17:47:20 So I wanna here your idea 17:47:29 to make the command more useful for testing 17:47:49 On the subject of namespace isolation, the current debug agent is not useful because a) it requires that tempest be running on the same box as the target and b) it requires sudo privileges to do so. 17:48:15 The debug agent needs to be able to run remotely if it is to be useful. 17:48:22 For a) quantum-debug command can be run remotely 17:48:26 Likely provided as a privileged quantum extension. 17:48:40 I agree for b) 17:48:42 nati_ueno: it can be called via an api? I wasn't sure of that. 17:49:14 mnewby: Ah you mean rpc. If so it not now. But we can use ssh for testing 17:50:14 nati_ueno: again, that isn't really acceptable for tempest testing. 17:50:21 nati_ueno: ssh'ing into a vm, yes. 17:50:31 ssh'ing into a host, not so much. 17:50:45 mnewby: I agree it is current tempest scope 17:51:16 We should not use host ssh for blackbox testing 17:51:29 However we can have whitebox testing which has ssh for host 17:52:20 Rohit is also working stackmonkey testing tool which kills openstack or mysql processes during test 17:52:30 So IMO we can extend scope of tempest 17:52:43 We can put it on different directories 17:53:21 I agree for rpc is more useful and cool. But I feel implementing rpc is too much for testing.. 17:54:09 makes sense to me 17:55:56 zyluo: Thanks 17:56:01 mnewby: How about you? 17:56:31 I have my doubts 17:56:42 I think we should be talking to Jay and the other tempest folks about this. 17:57:04 Having an unlimited scope for a project has the potential to make things very complicated indeed. 17:57:07 Plus, huge issue. 17:57:09 Huge 17:57:18 Metadata service doesn't work with namespaces. 17:57:20 (yet) 17:57:33 So compute is basically non-functional with namespaces enabled. 17:57:46 Can't do all kinds of configuration, including setting password and ssh keys. 17:57:57 Have you seen the bug. 17:58:09 ? 17:58:20 Not yet. But I agree for you. 17:58:34 May be it is too fast to test namespace which looks clearly broken 17:59:07 So I agree basic testing without namespace is more high priority now 17:59:08 Is there a need for the debug agent if namespaces aren't working? 17:59:18 mnewby: no need 17:59:40 So, moot then. 17:59:47 good/bad 18:00:34 on the upside, ssh'ing should work properly then. 18:00:43 without the debug agent. 18:01:32 It depends on topology 18:01:32 launch vm -> configure floating ip -> ssh 18:01:36 true 18:01:45 Ah I agree for floating ip 18:02:05 we'll need to ensure that devstack can be configured with l3 and an external network 18:02:17 yes 18:03:23 i'm wondering if we need to allow quantum to be queried as to what capabilities it is configured with... 18:03:29 I was asking dan that in the monday meeting. 18:03:31 like an extension 18:04:33 Ah that's needed 18:05:36 IMO, namespace support with nova is needed. I wanna test network connection without floating ip also in future. 18:05:48 namespace support with nova is needed, of course. 18:05:55 won't happen for folsom 18:06:02 I agree 18:06:16 did you see what i wrote in the recent review? 18:06:30 Which review? 18:06:53 The fix for non-namespaced metadata server support: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13218/ 18:07:11 The relevant comment: Supporting overlapping network spaces should be considered out-of-scope for this change. The metadata service identifies which instance to return data for by the ip address of the caller. Identifying what network the instance is calling from, in a secure manner, will likely require making a proxy for the metadata service available on each network. Such a proxy would be able to securely determine the network id and pass it on to 18:07:12 metadata service. This would require not only creating and configuring the proxy, but also adding (presuming it doesn't already exist) an authenticated request path to the metadata service. 18:07:20 I'll take a look now 18:07:50 Definitely doable to support namespaces with nova… Looks to be a lot of work, though. 18:08:13 hmm situation looks bad.. 18:08:23 Let's fix it on G 18:08:53 And let's focus tempest testing without namespace 18:08:57 for folsom 18:09:14 OK I could understand mnewby's point 18:09:31 ok, cool 18:09:39 Will Metadata service not be supported on namespaced networks ? 18:09:44 Let's move zyluo's one 18:09:51 zykes-: Correct 18:09:59 eh, ooook 18:10:01 aha sorry typo 18:10:11 doesn't that break like lots of features ? 18:10:28 zykes-: Like what? 18:10:35 #topic zyluo's WIP 18:10:35 mnewby: cloud-init ? 18:10:53 isn't it the metadata service in Nova you mean ? 18:11:14 zykes-: Yes. The funny thing is that the metadata service was completely broken until i added support this week. And nobody had noticed. 18:11:19 #fail 18:11:38 so it won't be supported at all in Folsom ? 18:11:46 even with or without namespacing ? 18:11:50 It will be supported 18:11:56 The changes went into quantum and nova yesterday 18:12:01 and will be part of folsom 18:12:08 Non-namespaced only, though. 18:12:10 mnewby: +1 18:12:25 mnewby: that kinda sucks ;p 18:12:48 OK let's talk about zyluo's update 18:12:53 Ahhh he is left 18:13:00 hmm 18:13:13 OK mnewby do you have other topics? 18:13:22 nati_ueno: I'm afraid I have nothing to report. 18:13:37 I've been busy getting a working configuration (and finding bugs in the process). 18:13:41 mnewby: I got it! I have no progress also. 18:13:50 mnewby: Thanks! 18:13:52 Ok 18:13:57 #endmeeting quantum_tempest