15:01:04 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:01:04 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Feb 21 15:01:04 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:04 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:04 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:01:06 <mnaser> was there previously an invisible_to_admin user or something like that in the past in devstack?
15:01:12 <mnaser> oops bad timing
15:01:14 <mnaser> ignore that :)
15:01:19 <lpiwowar> o/
15:01:54 <kopecmartin> mnaser: i don't know, let me get back to that at the end of the meeting in the Open Discussion
15:04:11 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:04:21 <kopecmartin> OpenStack Elections
15:04:29 <kopecmartin> the current status at
15:04:30 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/
15:05:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Antelope Priority Items progress
15:05:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority
15:05:50 * kopecmartin checks the status there
15:07:10 <frickler> no updates on ceph plugin I guess?
15:08:01 <kopecmartin> doesn't look like it
15:08:07 <kopecmartin> anyone working on that?
15:08:45 <frickler> I thought that at some time you wanted to take a look at the tempest issue. or was it gmann?
15:09:11 <kopecmartin> i think it was me and i lost it in the pile of tabs :/
15:09:38 <kopecmartin> i rechecked that to get fresh logs
15:09:57 <kopecmartin> i'm gonna try to get to that
15:10:06 <frickler> cool
15:10:26 <kopecmartin> so the goal is to fix whatever is failing here now, right?
15:10:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/865315
15:10:31 <kopecmartin> so that we can merge that
15:10:55 <frickler> yes
15:12:05 <kopecmartin> okey
15:12:51 <kopecmartin> there's been a progress on FIPS
15:12:53 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/871606
15:13:02 <kopecmartin> but that depends on a patch in zuul-jobs
15:13:35 <kopecmartin> i wonder whether there are patches which depend on the devstack one - becuase the patch ^^ doesn't change anything, just allows the consumers to enable fips
15:13:50 <kopecmartin> I'll check with Ade
15:16:10 <kopecmartin> oh, one thing i forgot to mention in the announcements section
15:16:27 <kopecmartin> we're about to release a new tempest tag
15:16:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/871018
15:16:36 <kopecmartin> the patches are in the queue depending on that one ^^
15:16:54 <kopecmartin> which  is currently blocked by the cirros bump, but i'll get to that later
15:17:09 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:17:12 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bobcat-ptg
15:17:18 <kopecmartin> if you have any ideas for the topics to discuss over the ptg, then ^^
15:18:05 <kopecmartin> i'll need to reserve some time and think about the topics we might wanna cover during the PTG
15:19:19 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:19:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:19:41 <kopecmartin> 2 reviews one is blocked by the other
15:20:06 <kopecmartin> the cirros version bump caused an issue with the dhcp client .. apparently the new cirros uses a different dhcp client by default
15:20:11 <opendevreview> Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/tempest master: Create a tempest test to verify bz#2118968  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/873706
15:20:13 <kopecmartin> more info here
15:20:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/874586
15:20:25 <kopecmartin> and in the associated bug report
15:22:42 <kopecmartin> anything urgent to review?
15:23:32 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:23:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:23:42 <kopecmartin> we're doing quite good here
15:23:46 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:23:51 <kopecmartin> stable
15:23:51 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:23:56 <kopecmartin> master
15:23:56 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:24:16 <kopecmartin> master got hit by the dhcp client issue
15:26:15 <kopecmartin> i'm checking whether those jobs would be fixed by the patch i earlier
15:27:23 <frickler> yes, I changed the dhcp client in order to better support different IPv6 scenarios
15:29:42 <kopecmartin> ack, it requires a small change in a few jobs because tempest uses the previous dhcp client by default
15:30:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:31:29 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:31:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:31:29 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:31:31 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:31:33 <kopecmartin> debian
15:31:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:31:37 <kopecmartin> focal
15:31:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0
15:31:41 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:31:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:31:45 <kopecmartin> openEueler
15:31:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0
15:32:55 <kopecmartin> all good, all passing, note that we merged the fix for rocky only a day or 2 ago
15:33:17 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:33:21 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:33:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:33:33 <kopecmartin> no reviews there
15:33:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:34:00 <kopecmartin> (gmann) PyPi additional maintainers audit for QA repo
15:34:04 <kopecmartin> regarding this
15:34:24 <kopecmartin> we have reached out to everyone we could find
15:34:36 <kopecmartin> i think we can consider this done
15:35:19 <kopecmartin> .. i made a note here that we are ok with the removal of additional maintainers
15:35:20 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup
15:35:37 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:36:26 <tkajinam> o/
15:36:42 <tkajinam> May I bring one topic ?
15:36:59 <kopecmartin> sure
15:37:07 <tkajinam> https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/commit/5838086dd4490b8a55ff58fc0bf0f108caa4e079
15:37:23 <tkajinam> I happened to notice uwsgi announced maintenance mode last year. is anybody aware of this ?
15:38:48 <tkajinam> this might be concerning for us because we are now extensively using uwsgi in devstack afaik
15:40:00 <kopecmartin> isn't the maintenance mode enough for us?
15:40:51 <tkajinam> if they will still maintain it well. but it's not a good sign imho.
15:41:02 <kopecmartin> yes, that's true
15:41:13 <kopecmartin> how can we mitigate that?
15:41:22 <kopecmartin> should we plan replacing that with something else?
15:41:56 <kopecmartin> (seems we have a topic for the upcoming virtual ptg)
15:42:12 <tkajinam> I noticed this 30 minutes ago so sharing this here so I don't have clear ideas now. we probably have to check the reason behind that shift and prepare replacement plan in case it becomes unmaintained.
15:43:03 <kopecmartin> tkajinam: i'm just thinking outloud .. thanks for sharing, it's very appreciated
15:43:30 <kopecmartin> gmann: ^ did it come up in TC?
15:43:56 <kopecmartin> let's gather more info and get back to this
15:44:16 <tkajinam> I'll send an email to openstack-discuss. probably that would be a good way to initiate discussion around this.
15:44:50 <kopecmartin> tkajinam: very good idea
15:44:51 <kopecmartin> +1
15:45:39 <kopecmartin> searching the ML whether it hasn't come up already and i don't see anything specific
15:46:17 <frickler> doesn't ring a bell for me, either, but certainly worth discussing
15:47:07 <kopecmartin> yeah, this is interesting, seems like a very important info and it didn't come up for a year o.O .. thanks again tkajinam
15:47:31 <frickler> regarding mnaser's question, I only know about the project of that name, not a user https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/master/lib/keystone#L343-L345
15:48:06 <tkajinam> kopecmartin frickler, thanks !
15:48:07 <mnaser> im trying to fix ospurge gate and its failing because of that
15:48:11 <mnaser> https://opendev.org/x/ospurge/src/branch/master/tools/func-tests.sh#L32
15:49:33 <kopecmartin> it doesn't look it's used anywhere else but there
15:49:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=invisible_to_admin_demo_pass&i=nope&literal=nope&files=&excludeFiles=&repos=
15:50:07 <frickler> mnaser: iiuc "demo" is the username and invisible_to_admin the project name
15:50:21 <frickler> do you have a link to a failure?
15:50:27 <mnaser> https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/ef954eefbef2439da35829b2f99d8ef5
15:50:44 <mnaser> yeah so i wonder if it's bitrot since its no longer used, since i checked codesearch too
15:53:47 <kopecmartin> it seds files under DEVSTACK_DIR which aren't there, i wonder whether they were there at some point or they were just generated by someone on the fly
15:54:31 <frickler> it seems accrc is no longer being created at all
15:54:37 <kopecmartin> the last commit in x/ospurge was done 3 years ago
15:54:57 <mnaser> yeah theres a lot of bitrot there
15:55:03 <mnaser> but ah ok if accrc is not a thing at all
15:55:13 <frickler> might be related to our general move to clouds.yaml, does ospurge support that?
15:55:30 <mnaser> i tihnk it uses openstacksdk client in the backend
15:55:40 <mnaser> so i could update the tests to use --os-cloud
15:56:11 <frickler> I think that that would be the best path looking forward
15:57:12 <mnaser> ok ill try to see what teh different options and how the clouds yaml file is generated and clean up that file
15:57:28 <frickler> we could add a cloud definition for the invisible project if needed
15:58:46 <frickler> anyway, I think we can also continue this discussion after the meeting
15:59:15 <kopecmartin> ack , last quick note about the bug triage
15:59:16 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:59:20 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope
15:59:27 <kopecmartin> numbers recorded as always
15:59:34 <kopecmartin> and we're out of time
15:59:52 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone for joining
15:59:57 <kopecmartin> see you online
16:00:04 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting