15:00:52 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:52 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Sep 13 15:00:52 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:53 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:53 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:01:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:01:03 <kopecmartin> agenda ^
15:01:54 <frickler> o/
15:02:07 <kopecmartin> hmm, i messed it up, i started the meeting in a different channel too, now i wonder what will happen :D
15:02:16 <kopecmartin> just 2 weeks on pto and i forget everything :D
15:02:57 <frickler> kopecmartin: I think those will be independent, just end the other one
15:03:04 <kopecmartin> i did
15:03:17 <lpiwowar> o/
15:03:30 <kopecmartin> and i can see a new file already - https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/
15:03:41 <kopecmartin> i wonder whether this meeting will override that once it's ended
15:03:53 <kopecmartin> let's test that, we'll see
15:04:02 <kopecmartin> o/
15:04:34 <eliadcohen__> o/
15:05:46 <kopecmartin> anyway, i'm back, long time no see, let's see how many things i've missed
15:05:51 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:06:16 <frickler> we have a new PTL, congrats kopecmartin :)
15:06:30 <kopecmartin> thanks
15:06:51 <lpiwowar> congrats!
15:07:04 <kopecmartin> interesting fact, i was actually in the Antelope canyon while the nomination process for Antelope cycle was in progress
15:07:24 <lpiwowar> :D
15:07:33 <frickler> that's dedicated preparation, great effort
15:07:56 <kopecmartin> :D
15:08:11 <kopecmartin> was anyone else interested in the PTL role?
15:08:29 <kopecmartin> i wasn't following any communication, i only made that one patch to nominate myself
15:09:10 <frickler> I don't think so, I would have suggested to move to distributed otherwise
15:09:22 <kopecmartin> but of course, i'm happy to continue serving as PTL .. i was just curious
15:09:26 <kopecmartin> ok, thanks
15:10:14 <frickler> the whole timing was weird, announcing things very late and changing dates on the fly
15:11:02 <kopecmartin> yeah, that was a bit weird, usually these things are announced much sooner , but luckily everything ended up great
15:11:58 <kopecmartin> the other thing to announce is a tempest release - a new tag - we need to do that soon
15:12:55 <kopecmartin> #topic Zed Priority Items progress
15:12:57 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority
15:13:00 <kopecmartin> any updates on this front?
15:13:45 <frickler> I think we should be in feature freeze now? so not much room for progress any more
15:15:29 <kopecmartin> that's true, any outstanding items will be triaged and discussed during PTG and some we'll carry over to the next cycle then
15:15:57 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:16:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-ptg
15:16:13 <kopecmartin> if you have anything you would like to discuss during the ptg, please feel free to add it to the etherpad ^^
15:16:34 <kopecmartin> we have less than a month until the event
15:16:47 <kopecmartin> ~ a month
15:18:04 <kopecmartin> hm, this reminds me, we should create a doodle so that we can find an appropriate time slot for the sessions
15:18:39 <frickler> there's a free alternative to doodle, but I need to look for the link
15:19:22 <kopecmartin> sounds good, let me know then and we can use that instead
15:19:42 <frickler> https://framadate.org/abc/en/
15:20:55 <kopecmartin> it looks interesting, i'll check it out, thanks
15:21:18 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:21:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:21:36 <kopecmartin> no reviews there
15:21:37 <kopecmartin> anything urgent for review?
15:22:08 <lpiwowar> I've just remove -1 from this patch. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/821732  .
15:22:26 <lpiwowar> It is stuck for long time now I think.
15:23:02 <kopecmartin> yeah, still on my review list
15:23:02 <kopecmartin> cant
15:23:07 <kopecmartin> can't get my head around taht
15:23:15 <lpiwowar> But I think we won't go with it now as we are in the feature freeze?
15:24:12 <lpiwowar> It just makes sure that some tests run in serial mode and uses locks to ensure it. But I do not know much about it too.
15:25:14 <kopecmartin> it depends, let's see, but if we decide to move that forward we'll do it not later than at the beginning of the next cycle
15:25:37 <lpiwowar> ack
15:25:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:25:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:26:02 <kopecmartin> we're at zero although only out of 2 rechecks ..
15:26:09 <kopecmartin> but still good news
15:26:37 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:26:46 <kopecmartin> stable
15:26:46 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:26:53 <kopecmartin> master
15:26:54 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:27:32 <kopecmartin> fips job timeouted today and tempest-full-oslo-master failed
15:27:48 <kopecmartin> but maybe it's just a random thing? we'll see tomorrow
15:28:48 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:28:55 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:28:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:29:01 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:29:01 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:29:08 <kopecmartin> debian
15:29:08 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:29:14 <kopecmartin> jammy
15:29:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0
15:29:32 <kopecmartin> all good, passing last few days but fedora which has been failing ;/
15:29:58 <kopecmartin> although just on stable branches
15:30:02 <kopecmartin> master seems ok
15:30:07 <frickler> fedora needs updating to f36, not sure when ianw will have time
15:30:14 <frickler> or maybe someone else
15:30:55 <frickler> and then I think we can drop those from stable branches
15:31:10 <frickler> they never have been working for very long
15:32:52 <frickler> ah, that reminds me of another PTG topic. decide which jammy variant to make standard
15:33:06 <kopecmartin> true, i don't see any passing builds on stable branches and i already scrolled to February
15:33:13 * frickler goes etherpadding
15:33:18 <kopecmartin> +1
15:34:09 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:34:15 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:34:20 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:34:38 <kopecmartin> nothing there
15:34:55 <kopecmartin> any reviews needing attention?
15:35:25 <lpiwowar> Nothing from my side
15:36:02 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:36:07 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:36:23 <frickler> any plans for rockylinux?
15:36:47 <frickler> now I remember, there was another patch proposed while you were away
15:36:50 <clarkb> I think I saw a patch for that
15:36:52 <clarkb> ya
15:37:25 <kopecmartin> really? that'd be great, i came to a dead end :/
15:37:45 <kopecmartin> well, mostly ran out of time
15:37:46 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/855393
15:37:58 <frickler> looks pretty easy compared to what you did
15:38:02 <clarkb> I was going to mention the slow ansible loops problem we've run into in a couple of places. The way ansible runs tasks each loop iteration is like a new task which includes all the task overhead. This can take 2-6 seconds in a lot of cases. This cost becomes a problem when you run a loop against a large list of inputs.
15:38:40 <clarkb> Please be on the lookout for these problems as addressing them can add nice easy speedups to jobs. Also, you can avoid copying one file at a time for example and use synchronize to do it with one task for example
15:39:31 <kopecmartin> frickler: it does, i wonder what i did wrong :D
15:39:50 <kopecmartin> clarkb: thanks for the heads up, i'll check some of my jobs wether we do something like that there or not
15:43:02 <kopecmartin> i'll check the rocky patch later, but it looks really good
15:43:12 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:43:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-zed
15:43:28 <kopecmartin> numbers are recorded ^^
15:43:46 <kopecmartin> this is all from my side for today, anything else to discuss?
15:45:23 <kopecmartin> thanks everyone
15:45:24 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting