14:00:12 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa
14:00:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 23 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:15 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:22 <masayukig> hi, who all here today?
14:00:25 <soniya29> hello
14:00:27 <tosky> hi
14:00:28 <kopecmartin> hi masayukig o/
14:00:34 <lpiwowar> hi o/
14:00:44 <kopecmartin> (my irc bot is working this week \o/ :D )
14:00:55 <masayukig> :)
14:01:06 <gmann> o/
14:01:17 <masayukig> OK, let's start
14:01:23 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
14:01:30 <masayukig> ^^^^^^ today's agenda
14:01:53 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
14:02:37 <masayukig> I have two things.
14:03:30 <masayukig> 1. Now Wallaby R-3, so, we have to release #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/releases
14:03:57 <gmann> R-3 or later
14:04:04 <masayukig> ah, yea
14:04:53 <gmann> for patrole we need to wait for this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/780622
14:05:08 <gmann> and we need to check for tempest too, what all we can get in for this release
14:05:12 <tosky> also, this devstack refactor is important for cinder-backup to support more drivers, and test the s3 one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171
14:05:31 <tosky> (I wanted to mention this later, but it seemed the right time)
14:05:36 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171
14:05:41 <masayukig> gmann: tosky thanks
14:06:01 <masayukig> 2. About the PTG, we'll talk about it later.
14:06:05 <gmann> May be next week I can check patrole and tempest pending patches and release new tag
14:06:24 <masayukig> gmann: thank you so much!
14:06:30 <masayukig> that's all from my side
14:06:43 <masayukig> let's move on
14:06:48 <masayukig> #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress
14:06:55 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority
14:07:10 <masayukig> Any updates for the priorities?
14:07:53 <gmann> kopecmartin: soniya29 how close we are for scenario manager stable?
14:08:09 <gmann> i remember last time we discussed the few things to finish which i added in etherpad
14:08:18 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager
14:08:43 <kopecmartin> those are still in progress
14:08:56 <soniya29> gmann, we have just two more apis for nova-network stuff to be pending
14:09:02 <soniya29> last two one
14:09:34 <gmann> kopecmartin: soniya29 can we get that in before April 2nd which is what is deadline for Tempest final release
14:09:49 <kopecmartin> i thinks so
14:09:50 <soniya29> sure gmann
14:09:53 <kopecmartin> *think
14:09:58 <gmann> great
14:10:02 <masayukig> cool
14:10:10 <soniya29> i will need help from you
14:10:12 <gmann> if you can push the code then we can merge them quickly
14:10:15 <kopecmartin> soniya29: sure
14:10:21 <gmann> sure,
14:10:47 <gmann> i think that is worth to wait for final release.
14:10:56 <masayukig> yeah
14:11:05 <masayukig> I agree
14:11:35 <masayukig> OK, let's move on to the next topic if nothing else on this topic
14:11:54 <gmann> soniya29: L358 to 364 you need to do all in once patch as they can break some tests
14:12:03 <gmann> soniya29: that is why your current patch failing.
14:12:16 <gmann> one patch
14:13:07 <soniya29> gmann, sure
14:13:54 <masayukig> thanks
14:14:39 <masayukig> anything else to discuss on this topic?
14:15:01 <gmann> that's all from me
14:15:07 <masayukig> thanks
14:15:09 <masayukig> anything else to discuss on this topic?
14:15:12 <masayukig> sorry
14:15:15 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
14:15:35 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-ptg
14:16:10 <masayukig> As I already emailed, we have to submit our vPTG slot
14:16:35 <masayukig> I can see only three people on the doodle now #link https://doodle.com/poll/5ixvdcbm488kc2ic
14:16:42 <gmann> yeah, we can decide the slot now
14:17:06 <masayukig> The first 4 hours of the PTG are enough for us?
14:17:36 <gmann> yeah, as per current topic list we should book for 4 hours.
14:17:49 <gmann> and secure rbac can take more time so keeping buffer is good
14:18:34 <masayukig> OK, I just put QA slots for four hours on Grizzly
14:18:41 <gmann> I think Monday- Tuesday 13-15 UTC?
14:19:03 <gmann> or Monday 13-15 UTC and Tuesday - Wed 13-14 UTC ?
14:20:47 <kopecmartin> i'm fine with both
14:20:57 <masayukig> gmann: Oh, are Tuesday 13-15 UTC OK for you?
14:21:26 <gmann> yeah that can work but if we divide between Tuesday and Wed then it can be even better
14:22:05 <gmann> but whatever works for others, both option work for me
14:22:35 <masayukig> gmann: kopecmartin I put them on Cactus. Do they work for you?
14:22:41 <kopecmartin> yes
14:23:05 <gmann> yeah.
14:23:06 <masayukig> Mon13-15UTC, Tue 13-14 Wed 13-14
14:23:09 <masayukig> OK, cool
14:23:15 <gmann> thanks
14:24:02 <masayukig> OK, that's all from my side
14:24:03 <gmann> once keystone slots are there we can adjust the secure rbac topic as we need lbragstad or other keystone members for that.
14:24:27 <masayukig> yeah
14:24:43 <gmann> i added note in etherpad too
14:25:23 <gmann> lbragstad: its about devstack/tempest next steps for secure rbac. L41 for QA PTG https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-ptg
14:25:47 <masayukig> kopecmartin: could you submit the vptg survey if you have bw? #link https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/april2021_vptg_survey
14:26:01 <kopecmartin> masayukig: yes, sure
14:26:33 <masayukig> thanks!
14:26:36 <masayukig> I think you'll moderate. There's a question about it :) "Who will be moderating their discussions?"
14:26:45 <masayukig> on the survey
14:26:58 <kopecmartin> already reading .. yeah , ok :)
14:27:18 <masayukig> thanks again :-)
14:27:43 <masayukig> OK, I think that's all for this topic
14:27:47 <masayukig> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:28:10 <masayukig> Any blocker or patches for the gate
14:28:11 <masayukig> ?
14:28:36 <gmann> patrole gate unblock is in gate
14:28:37 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/780622
14:29:00 <gmann> and i think other gate is green.
14:29:19 <masayukig> thanks
14:29:29 <kopecmartin> it seems like the unblock patch needs another unblock patch :D
14:29:56 <masayukig> hmm..
14:29:58 <gmann> masayukig: kopecmartin we need to be little careful now about feature freeze as its R-3
14:30:09 <gmann> for devstack, tempest, grenade especially
14:30:16 <gmann> and devstack is more critical
14:31:01 <masayukig> sure
14:31:12 <gmann> kopecmartin: ah right, dansmith image namespace client work needs to be taken care
14:31:17 <gmann> I will update that today
14:31:52 <kopecmartin> cool
14:31:56 <masayukig> thanks
14:32:23 <masayukig> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:32:35 <masayukig> Periodic stable: #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:33:18 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic
14:33:26 <gmann> masayukig: kopecmartin added a topic in ptg etherapd too to clearly define what is feature freeze for QA
14:33:39 <kopecmartin> gmann: perfect
14:33:43 <gmann> we can discuss what is allowed and what is not
14:33:44 <masayukig> great
14:33:50 <kopecmartin> that will be helpful
14:34:10 <masayukig> yes.
14:34:45 <masayukig> It seems almost green the periodic jobs now
14:34:53 <gmann> yeah
14:35:15 <masayukig> ok, cool
14:35:23 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program)
14:35:38 <masayukig> Tempest
14:35:41 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
14:36:04 <masayukig> Any tempest patches to discuss?
14:36:15 <gmann> I think scenario manager is one things we need to get in for final release and I will also check if anything else we need to merge on priority
14:36:46 <masayukig> thanks
14:38:08 <kopecmartin> nothing specific from my side, i'll go through the patches too
14:38:21 <gmann> nice, +1
14:39:03 <masayukig> thanks. ok, how about patrole? #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:39:17 <gmann> i think the gate fix we can merge
14:39:38 <gmann> I do not think there is any other open things there
14:39:44 <masayukig> ok, we already talked
14:39:52 <masayukig> Devstack
14:39:59 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:40:08 <gmann> or may be this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/778573
14:40:14 <gmann> but that is failing in zuul
14:41:18 <tosky> here is the place where I would have mentioned the devstack review above about cinder-backup
14:42:26 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171
14:42:30 <masayukig> This one?
14:42:54 <tosky> yes, that one
14:44:12 <masayukig> I see. thanks
14:44:43 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/devstack master: nova: Default NOVA_USE_SERVICE_TOKEN to True  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/775573
14:45:33 <masayukig> anything else on devstack?
14:46:43 <masayukig> Grenade #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open
14:47:12 <masayukig> I don't see patches these days
14:47:42 <masayukig> And, how about Hacking?
14:47:45 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
14:47:50 <gmann> may be this one #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/749358
14:48:06 <gmann> otherwise not much in grenade side
14:48:36 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/hacking/+/773814
14:49:01 <gmann> as discussed in TC and I updated on ML, we can remove the l-c completly
14:49:26 <gmann> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021204.html
14:49:57 <masayukig> OK
14:50:13 <masayukig> I already +2, though :p
14:50:30 <masayukig> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:50:41 <masayukig> Any other gate blocker or urgent ones?
14:51:11 <slaweq> gmann: hi
14:51:17 <gmann> slaweq: hi
14:51:34 <slaweq> may I have some question or do You have meeting now?
14:51:48 <gmann> we are in office hour
14:52:01 <slaweq> ok, I will get back later
14:52:03 <slaweq> sorry
14:52:05 <gmann> sure
14:52:23 <gmann> masayukig: nothing gate blocker as far as i know or what we already discussed
14:52:28 <masayukig> yeah
14:52:34 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion
14:52:44 <masayukig> Anything to discuss?
14:52:46 <tosky> very quick question, you may have seen https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/782392 - it is possible with some fixes to devstack-plugin-ceph to have that test passing
14:53:06 <tosky> (proper working of snapshots deletion)
14:53:24 <tosky> but I'm not 100% sure that it would work on all branches were tempest runs, due to the different version of ceph supported
14:53:49 <tosky> what should I do in that case? Change the skip based on the protocol into a skip based on a keyword, so that each job can set it?
14:54:20 <gmann> tosky: but that bug is still not fixed?  #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1677525
14:54:23 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1663814 in Cinder "duplicate for #1677525 RBD:failed to delete a referenced snapshot" [Undecided,New]
14:55:00 <tosky> gmann: the bug is fixed if you use ceph >= mimic and you set a configuration setting (using the new Ceph Clone v2 API)
14:55:03 <tosky> or something like that
14:55:30 <tosky> I've been helping other people who were testing it
14:55:34 <openstackgerrit> Sorin Sbârnea proposed opendev/elastic-recheck master: WIP: Run elastic-recheck container  https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/elastic-recheck/+/729623
14:55:56 <tosky> and I'd like to have it enabled in the gates too if possible
14:56:40 <masayukig> hmm, I think it's not so quick question :) Can we discuss it after the office hour?
14:56:54 <gmann> I might not understand it completely, but you are saying with configuration change it can pass?
14:57:24 <gmann> and with default or some configuration it cannot ?
14:57:34 <gmann> and how about configuration we have in gate?
14:57:41 <tosky> sure, we can close the office hour and discuss it immediately afterward
14:57:48 <masayukig> tosky: thanks
14:58:00 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage (last 30 min)
14:58:17 <masayukig> kopecmartin: sorry for the short, any critical bugs?
14:58:26 <kopecmartin> none critical ones
14:58:34 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-wallaby
14:58:39 <masayukig> kopecmartin: thanks!
14:58:49 <tosky> (apologize, I though "Open Discussion" was the last point)
14:59:10 <kopecmartin> np, i haven't had much time for bugs lately :/
14:59:36 <masayukig> tosky: no worries. That's my bad time management
14:59:57 <masayukig> OK, let's close the office hour, anyway
15:00:03 <masayukig> thank you all
15:00:10 <masayukig> #endmeeting