13:00:23 #startmeeting qa 13:00:24 Meeting started Tue Aug 25 13:00:23 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 13:01:36 o/ 13:01:42 hello 13:01:52 hey o/ 13:01:53 Hi o/ 13:02:00 hi 13:02:47 hi 13:06:14 seems masayuki is logged off 13:06:47 maybe connection issues 13:06:59 yeah, let's wait for couple of min otherwise i will start 13:07:13 ok 13:09:22 ok, let's start 13:09:27 #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 13:09:30 today agenda ^^ 13:09:40 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 13:10:30 one announcement is kopecmartin is being added as core list in os-testr, stackviz and few more QA repo to speed up their patches to merge 13:11:09 #topic Victoria Priority Items progress 13:11:13 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority 13:11:41 tempest cleanup patch is ready for reviews .. the same for the documentation one 13:11:52 please add your progress here if any 13:11:57 kopecmartin: cool link? 13:12:08 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745814/ 13:12:19 you were faster :D 13:12:35 both of them are in the priority etherpad 13:12:58 and tested in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746690/8 ? 13:13:15 yes 13:13:46 * gmann but it did not fail in cleanup phase - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/92d3929cbea0442dbbde98c830b04177/console 13:14:06 anyways let's review 13:14:32 congrats and thanks kopecmartin 13:15:23 svyas: i think your scenario manager is also ready ? 13:16:12 gmann, Still all the methods of etherpad aren't verified, so I cant say yes 13:16:27 gmann, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager 13:16:41 svyas: are you doing all in one patch, i think one patch per method we decided 13:17:52 gmann, nope, As far as I remember, we decided to cover it in one patch 13:18:04 svyas: modified the topic to 'tempest-scenario-manager-stable' in image patch. let's keep single topic which will be easy to review 13:18:32 gmann, okay 13:18:50 we have a blueprint for that which may be used as well .. 13:18:56 svyas: i mean one patch in list L85 - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager 13:19:02 for each item 13:19:20 kopecmartin: yeah, we need to add that too in cmt msg 13:19:22 svyas: ^^ 13:20:26 ok, let's move net 13:20:28 one updates on test documentation- zhufl is ready with few more patches in this series - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/testcase-description+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:20:28 gmann, okay, then the above patch is ready. 13:20:41 svyas: cool. i will check today 13:20:50 gmann, thanks 13:21:11 any other progress to report? 13:21:44 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 13:22:00 masayukig is here now? 13:22:06 yeah, thanks 13:22:08 he has created the etherpad for PTG 13:22:17 irccloud or my connection issue// 13:22:27 masayukig: ohk, take over its your now :) 13:22:48 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-ptg 13:23:04 #link https://doodle.com/poll/qqd7ayz3i4ubnsbb 13:23:45 Please check and submit them and put your ideas on the etherpad 13:23:58 and doodle, too 13:24:06 sure thing 13:24:17 doodle for time or how many hours we need for PTG? 13:24:50 sure 13:25:07 masayukig: not sure we can choose time as of now as there might be other project conflcit later when other project are ready 13:25:40 how about doing QA at the start of PTG like we did in V PTG ? but it will be more clear once other projects fill the time 13:25:52 gmann: I don't decide it yet. We can think after the etherpad. OK. I think we can decide about it later 13:26:17 yeah, let's collect the topic first which is need to decide the time slot. 13:26:30 gmann: +1 13:27:02 masayukig: any deadline to write topics? 13:27:32 we need to book slot by Sept 11th 13:27:59 maybe around Sep 4th? 13:28:06 no, Sep 7th 13:28:07 yeah, that will be safe 13:28:18 yeah 7 13:28:49 ok, anything else? 13:30:13 nothing from my side, 13:30:32 #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 13:30:48 Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking? 13:30:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 13:31:05 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 13:31:09 Tempest gate is up, we need to speed up the review i think 13:31:10 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 13:31:14 I made patch which makes sure that import line added by check-uuid tool is added to the correct place https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744904/ 13:31:22 i found out that opendev.org dosn't render readmes properly: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016775.html 13:31:37 I found an issue in grenade (/me waits for the others to finish) 13:32:07 lpiwowar__: great, i liked the other approach, i need to test a bit though 13:32:10 kopecmartin: ohk, did not read the ML. is it fixed now ? 13:32:13 I am trying to get all gate including non-voting gate to working in patrole so I need some reviews https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:ds6901%2540att.com+status:open 13:32:27 gmann: no, i'm not sure on what side it should be fixed 13:32:32 bigdogstl: ack, I have started on few of them 13:32:33 kopecmartin: Ok, thanks! 13:32:51 pleia2: thanks for update, I will re-review it 13:32:57 ohh 13:32:58 Yes gmann, thank you 13:32:58 is it a bug on opendev.org side? or do we need to do some special configuration in the projects? 13:33:02 lpiwowar__: ^^ 13:33:03 lpiwowar__: cool 13:33:27 kopecmartin: not sure, i need to read the ML thread. 13:33:53 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744904/ 13:34:02 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-August/016775.html 13:34:18 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:ds6901%2540att.com+status:open 13:34:24 patrole gate which was broken again with my nova policy changes (which are completed now) is now fixed by bigdogstl . thanks for that. 13:34:42 * masayukig is a link bot 13:34:46 I found an issue on grenade a few days ago, fixed now in master: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747579/ 13:35:00 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747579/ 13:35:01 for hacking, we have review up for adding new checks. 13:35:04 there is an open backport for ussuri, and I plan to backport it further (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747650/) 13:35:15 gmann you are welcome 13:35:27 but then it means we have never been testing horizon with grenade 13:35:31 for a while at least 13:35:56 and I've also noticed that trove-grenade, which is in the experimental queue of both grenade and trove, is kind of useless, 13:36:08 because unless I've missed it, trove has no grenade plugin (!) 13:36:22 tosky: humm, does horixon has grenade job ? becasue base greande jobs does not run horizon test 13:36:27 what should we do? Just remove it from both grenade and trove (which would also clean the last legacy job in trove)? 13:36:39 yeah remove. 13:36:59 gmann: no grenade job in horizon.git 13:37:00 from trove it can be and they can fixed but from grenade gate we can reomove for now 13:37:24 and once trove job is ready and trove team want to add in grenade gate too then we can re-add 13:38:03 tosky: yeah, we have moved the horizon tempest test from tempest and i think since than no horizon testing in grenade job 13:38:08 vishalmanchanda: amotoki ^^ 13:38:57 vishalmanchanda: amotoki seems we need horizon testing in grenade. 13:39:22 we can enable it in base job also with installing their tempest plugin 13:39:53 let's wait for vishalmanchanda or amotoki reply. 13:40:11 I think horizon has (kind of) integration tests internally. But let's wait for the reply 13:40:46 yeah, those also can be run 13:41:01 anything else about this topic? 13:41:28 ok, let's move on to the next topic 13:41:30 #topic Community goal tracking 13:41:36 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking 13:41:59 gmann: any updates on this? 13:42:27 yeah 13:42:34 patrole one is merged - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740371/ 13:42:35 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740371/ 13:43:03 i think 3-4 repo left from QA side. I have not debugged the failure last week. 13:43:12 that is all for today. 13:43:38 thanks, great 13:44:16 I'd like to dig it when I have the time 13:44:25 #topic Bug Triage 13:44:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria 13:44:54 tempest numbers look better and better every week 13:45:06 +1 13:45:07 wonderful :) 13:45:20 masayukig: i found your review, could you revisit please? #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683026/ 13:45:35 kopecmartin: sure, will do 13:45:41 thanks 13:46:29 oh, what an old patch :p 13:46:52 nothing else from my side .. there are as always patches to review in the etherpad .. 13:47:17 thanks. yes 13:47:27 kopecmartin: feel free to tag them with Review priority as per bug importance. 13:47:55 +1 13:48:04 sure, some of them already are i think 13:48:20 thanks 13:48:20 ok 13:48:45 let's move on if nothing else on this topic 13:48:51 #topic Critical Reviews 13:48:59 any other patches to discuss? 13:50:09 gmann: regarding the tempest cleanup patch .. check the previous build of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746690/ .. 13:50:35 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746690/ 13:50:50 kopecmartin: ah this one #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/ad3e56d0ff444f7981f1a71cc3872ec9/console 13:50:52 gmann: in build 8 tempest cleanup was succesfull so no resources were left behind and it didn't fail .. in build 7 i turned off cleanup and ran only dry run 13:51:01 kopecmartin: great. it will be good now 13:51:38 masayukig: thanks i always keep forgetting to use "#link" 13:51:44 gmann: great :) 13:51:52 kopecmartin: no worries :) 13:52:56 ok, let's move on to the last topic if nothing else 13:53:03 #topic Open Discussion 13:53:24 anything to discuss? 13:53:35 nothing from my side. 13:54:20 neither from mine 13:54:23 gmann: thank you for starting the office hour today :) 13:54:29 Hi I have something: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747407/1 -> I am trying to fix centos7 in train and below but this patchset does not seem sufficient. Anyone any clues for what else is needed? 13:54:30 masayukig: np! 13:55:31 TomStappaerts: did you merge this also - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746590/ ? 13:56:00 ah its train so not needed 13:56:07 its py2 in train 13:56:50 gmann: yeah it's centos7/py2 13:57:11 "net_mlx5: cannot load glue library: libibverbs.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" is the centos7 job error on #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747407/ ? 13:57:54 But I don't know where it comes from 13:58:03 TomStappaerts: not anything on top of my head, may be yoctozepto or frickler knows if any backport we are missing 13:58:52 + 13:58:54 ++ 13:59:09 ok thx, I'll tag them in the patchset :) 13:59:33 anything else? 13:59:59 let's close the office hour if nothing 14:00:05 Thank you all!!! 14:00:08 #endmeeting