13:00:57 #startmeeting qa 13:01:06 Meeting started Tue Aug 4 13:00:57 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:09 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 13:01:17 Hi, who all are here today? 13:01:35 Hi 13:01:56 Hi 13:01:59 mentally or virtual-physically? 13:02:15 hi 13:02:18 hello 13:03:11 hi all, let's wait for a couple of minutes so that people can join 13:04:06 hi 13:04:53 hi 13:06:01 OK, let's start 13:06:05 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting 13:06:07 ^^^^^ This is the agenda for today 13:06:17 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 13:06:47 I have no announcement and action item. Let's skip 13:06:58 #topic Victoria Priority Items progress 13:07:07 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority 13:07:48 Any updates on priorities? 13:09:41 not from my side .. but there is a patch regarding the doc string generation ready for review 13:10:26 Thank you kopecmartin. Here is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:10:35 kopecmartin: lpiwowar: ok, cool. 13:10:41 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:11:32 It seems it needs manual rebase? 13:12:46 Ok, I see ... I will rebase it. 13:13:10 lpiwowar: thanks! great. 13:14:12 anything else? 13:15:16 ok, let's move on if nothing. 13:15:17 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 13:15:29 I have updated scenario manager patch with further improvements like updating docstrings 13:15:43 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724631/ 13:15:52 svyas: thanks, cool #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724631/ 13:16:44 kopecmartin, the patch is expected to address all the things which we are expecting in the blueprint, the thing is I can't update everything all at time 13:18:12 hm, checking the patch 13:18:17 maybe, the patch can be split into some patches. 13:18:33 kopecmartin, I will need some time. More of the patchsets these days were related to improval of docstrings but the objective isn't limited to it. Hence, I am keeping the commit message as it is 13:20:13 ok 13:20:59 ok, let's skip the topic anyway. 13:21:05 #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 13:21:07 I think one patch is okay 13:21:37 svyas: ok, I'll check it anyway 13:21:44 sure 13:21:49 Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking? 13:21:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 13:22:04 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 13:22:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 13:23:40 patrole gate are failing 13:24:11 @Gmann is looking at it 13:24:57 bigdogstl: yeah, #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743064/ doesn't work? 13:25:45 umm, it looks it still WIP 13:27:54 I didn't look at it that much so far. I'll check when I have bandwidth. 13:28:29 OK, let's move on if nothing 13:28:40 masayukig thanks 13:29:01 #topic Community goal tracking 13:29:09 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking 13:30:04 There are patches we should look at. especially for "2. Migrate CI/CD jobs to new Ubuntu LTS Focal" 13:30:53 Most of the patches are already merged but some are still remaining. 13:31:41 Let's move on since since gmann isn't here this time. 13:31:54 #topic Bug Triage 13:32:02 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria 13:33:14 in regards to bugs, interesting fact - the number of new bugs is finally lower than 10 and open bugs lower than 100 13:33:24 which is good considering the numbers from 6 months ago 13:33:53 kopecmartin: nice! 13:33:59 kopecmartin: that sounds great. 13:34:12 besides that, as always i highlighted a few reviews which needs a core review - they will lead to a bug resolution .. so please have a look 13:35:37 kopecmartin++ yes, indeed. 13:37:07 I'll check some of them. One patch at least.. 13:37:38 anything else on this topic? 13:38:08 not from my side 13:38:12 thanks 13:38:13 #topic Critical Reviews 13:38:25 Any patches you'd like to discuss? 13:38:40 I need help with this patch please: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701352/10. I am not sure where the check-uuid tool should put the "from tempest.lib import decorators" line when there is no tempest import in the file. 13:40:48 i see, that's a good question, i think we can expect, that the tools is used only by plugins .. in that case the import falls to a category number 2 (per your comment) - Related third party imports 13:41:20 however, the question is, how to check if the import which are in the files are standard library imports (category 1 ) or category 3 - local app imports 13:42:41 i don't know atm , i need to think about it 13:43:07 Ok ... I did some research today but I found nothing. I will try to come up with something too. 13:44:18 I don't think we have how to check it. I'll revisit the patch with my fresh brain later 13:44:32 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701352/ 13:44:44 * masayukig forgot to put the link. 13:45:12 masayukig: Ok, thank you:) 13:45:32 #topic Open Discussion 13:45:41 anything else you'd like to discuss? 13:46:07 one thing 13:46:30 we deprecated img_dir option in tempest: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710996/ 13:46:56 due to that change i posted a few reviews to related projects, see #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:remove_img_dir+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:47:47 can we somehow increase the awareness of those changes? 13:47:59 kopecmartin: great, thanks. 13:48:17 To bring it to the ML? 13:48:28 to get awareness? 13:49:17 just to get core reviews, because if they are not merged, once we remove img_dir from tempest completely (in next cycle) it will cause those projects troubles , soo... 13:51:20 kopecmartin: you mean we need to get core reviews of openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest, openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin, x/novajoin-tempest-plugin, ...etc. Am I correct? 13:51:29 masayukig: yes 13:51:38 If so, I think the ML is the first place 13:51:57 i know cores for os_tempest f.e... but i don't know cores for other projects .. so i just wanted to raise the topic here 13:52:32 kopecmartin: I added more unit tests to https://review.opendev.org/#/c/741810/ if you have time can you re-review. I also created a bug for it. Anyone else that has time a review would be appreciated 13:53:14 bigdogstl: ok, thanks, i'll check that 13:53:21 kopecmartin: OK, sure. But I don't know either. 13:53:46 kopecmartin: I know barbican cores; their meeting starts at the same time of this one (but today it ended earlier) 13:53:47 Maybe, some of the projects are not active atm. 13:53:55 if you raise it on the list I can ask again next week 13:55:09 tosky++ thanks, cool 13:55:13 ok, i'll send an email to openstack-discuss 13:55:40 kopecmartin++ thanks 13:56:08 anything else? 13:56:51 if nothing, let's close the office hour 13:57:02 thank you all!!! 13:57:04 #endmeeting