13:01:39 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa
13:01:40 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 14 13:01:39 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:01:41 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:01:44 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
13:01:53 <masayukig> Hi, who all are here today?
13:02:01 <soniya29> hello
13:02:05 <paras333> hi
13:02:08 <gmann> o/
13:02:20 <masayukig> soniya29: paras333 gmann hi :)
13:03:03 <kopecmartin> hi
13:03:17 <masayukig> kopecmartin: hi o/
13:03:24 <masayukig> OK, let's start
13:03:35 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
13:03:43 <masayukig> ^^^^^^ today's agenda
13:04:01 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
13:04:29 <masayukig> I have no announcement this time
13:04:40 <masayukig> let's skip
13:04:51 <masayukig> #topic Victoria Priority Items progress
13:04:58 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority
13:05:49 <kopecmartin> no updates from my side regarding the priority items
13:06:04 <masayukig> kopecmartin: thanks, np.
13:06:35 <gmann> pin constraint in tox #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739609/
13:07:22 <masayukig> gmann: cool, thanks
13:07:39 <soniya29> I have started working on sceanario manager and have picked create_volume() method for start
13:08:31 <soniya29> I have updated the etherpad - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager regarding it
13:08:35 <masayukig> gmann: I added me to the patch.
13:08:36 <gmann> that is pending for review, afazekas has suggestion of making it branch but i feel branchless still give us benefit
13:08:45 <gmann> thanks
13:08:55 <masayukig> soniya29: cool!
13:09:03 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager
13:09:28 <gmann> other than tox constraint i think we are good to handle the compatibility
13:09:57 <masayukig> I didn't have time to review patches these days but I will.
13:10:25 <gmann> so that whatever (tox.ini, requirements.txt etc) is checkout with any tempest tag should be workable as it is.
13:12:09 <gmann> that is all from me, i replied in review too
13:12:53 <masayukig> gmann: that sounds great.
13:13:27 <masayukig> I'll check it, I didn't have time to review patches these days, though...
13:13:47 <masayukig> OK, anything else?
13:13:54 <gmann> np!, thanks.
13:14:12 <gmann> for system scope testing
13:14:51 <gmann> i have marked the review as important changes and those are ready for review, i have done first round of review and added devstack and testing patches
13:15:21 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:admin-auth-system-scope+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
13:15:38 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:system_scope_testing+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
13:16:24 <gmann> Review Priority label needs to be re-added as those were updated. i will do in my re-review
13:17:02 <masayukig> ++ thanks for rasing up and the links
13:17:05 <gmann> this is one of the pending work and priority things we should finish as projects started adding the scope_type in their policies
13:18:06 <masayukig> yeah, from ussuri
13:20:57 <masayukig> ok, if nothing else, let's move on
13:21:06 <gmann> yeah
13:21:21 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
13:21:43 <masayukig> I don't have any events updates yet.
13:22:30 <masayukig> let's skip
13:22:32 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program)
13:22:49 <masayukig> Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking?
13:22:58 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
13:23:05 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
13:23:14 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
13:23:48 <gmann> I have not looked at the Patrole gate if any issue?
13:24:54 <masayukig> me neither
13:25:03 <gmann> but we can move, i do not have much details to share
13:25:24 <gmann> from devstack side there is one
13:25:45 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740322/
13:26:10 <gmann> running glance as standalone when other services are on uwsgi
13:26:22 <gmann> this is in-progress.
13:26:47 <gmann> that is all
13:27:21 <masayukig> That sounds interesting, I'll check
13:27:56 <gmann> this is long pending/stuck things for years
13:28:10 <masayukig> oh, years..
13:28:36 <gmann> yeah its uwsgi tings
13:28:37 <gmann> things
13:29:54 <masayukig> ah, I see. I don't know much detail, though
13:30:13 <masayukig> if anything else, let's move on
13:30:23 <gmann> yeah
13:30:35 <masayukig> #topic Community goal tracking
13:30:52 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking
13:31:04 <tosky> about that, I sent this for review: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739829/
13:31:39 <tosky> a similar change should go into tempest, I wasn't sure whether to remove legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-multinode-full for all jobs or just from ussuri, but I think it could be cleaned everywhere
13:32:06 <tosky> unless I'm mistaken, those are the only remaining legacy jobs used in QA repositories
13:32:57 <gmann> I will check, i think we do have dvr multindoe job but need to check
13:33:28 <masayukig> http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-multinode-full&i=nope&files=&repos= in Nova, too?
13:33:41 <gmann> for focal migration. i have added testing or migration patches for all repo #link neutron-grenade-dvr-multinode
13:33:49 <tosky> masayukig: yes https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740447/
13:33:54 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
13:34:04 <tosky> masayukig: I just mentioned what concerns the QA side
13:34:04 <masayukig> tosky: cool :0
13:34:06 <masayukig> :)
13:34:09 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740447/
13:34:32 <gmann> hacking patch needs re-review and need release - #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739334/
13:35:35 <openstackgerrit> Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: Make Glance standalone-ness a separate flag  https://review.opendev.org/740322
13:36:36 <masayukig> I'll check. I think I'll be able to have time to review tomorrow and this weekend, hopefully.
13:37:36 <gmann> other than that there are many deps lower constraints issue which need fixfr focal migration, i am picking those repo by repo
13:38:25 <masayukig> gmann: thank you so much!
13:39:26 <paras333> Just that same hacking stuff from my end  that need you guys to review #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/hacking
13:40:44 <masayukig> paras333: thank you for raising up
13:41:06 <masayukig> yes, definitely
13:41:55 <masayukig> let's move on to next topic unless anything else
13:42:07 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage
13:42:18 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria
13:43:38 <masayukig> There are many patches to review.
13:44:41 <masayukig> any particular patches and/or bugs we'd like to discuss?
13:45:19 <lpiwowar> Hi:), I am sorry I did not mentioned it earlier. I created patch for the auto generation of documentation for tests in tempest. Can someone please take a look? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/
13:46:03 <masayukig> ok, that's the next topic :)
13:46:04 <masayukig> #topic Critical Reviews
13:46:12 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/
13:46:37 <lpiwowar> masayukig: Ok:)
13:46:57 <paras333> lpiwowar:  if it's ready can you remove WIP from the commit message? that would be great
13:47:15 <masayukig> paras333: +1 :)
13:47:18 <lpiwowar> paras333: Ok:)
13:47:42 <paras333> lpiwowar:  thanks
13:47:49 <masayukig> lpiwowar: and add more commit message would be good
13:48:32 <lpiwowar> masayukig: Ok, I'll correct the commit message.
13:48:42 <gmann> is this on top of zhufl patches where she is adding the test documentation?
13:48:43 <masayukig> lpiwowar: ++ thanks!
13:49:47 <lpiwowar> gmann: I do not know about the patch from zhufl.
13:50:02 <masayukig> gmann: I think so. But I think they can be separated?
13:50:18 <masayukig> I mean there's no dependency between them
13:50:32 <gmann> but do we have tests with descriptions?
13:50:48 <paras333> zhufl patch #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/testcase-description+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
13:51:09 <gmann> to check the generated doc from 735619/
13:51:38 <gmann> few of them are merged so we can check those at least.
13:52:08 <masayukig> gmann: yes, agreed
13:55:58 <gmann> we can move to next. i will review the patch with generated doc
13:56:35 <lpiwowar> gmann: Thanks!:)
13:57:53 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion
13:58:03 <masayukig> anything else to discuss?
13:58:27 <masayukig> we have only 1.5mins, though :p
13:59:00 <gmann> nothing else form me
13:59:04 <paras333> nops
13:59:15 <masayukig> Thanks, ok, let's close the office hour.
13:59:22 <masayukig> Thank you all!!!
13:59:25 <gmann> thanks
13:59:32 <masayukig> #endmeeting