17:00:05 #startmeeting qa 17:00:06 Meeting started Thu Sep 28 17:00:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is andreaf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:00:16 #https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_September_28th_2017_.281700_UTC.29 Today's agenda 17:00:32 Hello everyone, who's here for the meeting today? o/ 17:01:10 \o 17:01:13 o/ 17:01:28 o/ 17:02:14 hello :) 17:02:37 Let's get started 17:03:10 I changed a bit the agenda and pruned a few things out 17:04:07 Not because we don't need to discuss things anymore, only I would like to keep the meetings to the time needed, and discuss topic when people add them to the agenda or bring them up during the meeting 17:05:41 According to what we discussed during PTG we will keep meetings even if they are not always getting a lot of participation, however I would like to keep them to the indispensible 17:06:03 ok let's move on 17:06:17 One thing I wanted to mention is the forum submission deadline 17:06:34 #info The deadline for submission of topics for the forum is tomorrow Sep 29th 17:07:08 So if you have ideas for things to be discussed there you still have a bit of time for that, but not much 17:07:26 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-sydney-forum-topics The etherpad for that 17:08:05 Otherwise I will submit the topics we had in Boston as well about getting feedback / input on QA tools from users 17:08:25 #topic bug triage 17:09:29 As discussed during the PTG I would like to setup the role of bug czar and I put together a proposed definition of the role 17:09:32 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-czar 17:10:00 chandankumar graciously offered to help and take the role 17:10:23 so I would like people input on the etherpad 17:10:29 andreaf: thanks :-) 17:10:36 chandankumar: thank you 17:10:44 let me know what you think about that 17:11:38 since we are such a small group today I would switch to open discussion now 17:11:52 so people can bring up any topic they may have for discussion 17:12:02 #topic Open Discussion 17:12:59 * mguiney waves 17:13:27 hello! two things, both tempest related: 17:14:26 the first being that I currently have a tempest patch up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500470/ 17:14:27 patch 500470 - tempest - Add "list projects for a single-project user" test 17:14:52 and would really appreciate some review so I can keep moving towards getting it merged 17:15:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500470/ 17:15:30 patch 500470 - tempest - Add "list projects for a single-project user" test 17:16:13 (thank you, apologies for using the wrong format, not super used to talking in this meeting :) ) 17:16:39 mguiney: no worries 17:17:41 mguiney: ok I will review it 17:17:53 mguiney: what's the second thing? 17:17:58 the second thing was to give y'all a heads up that we're currently doing scoring for the new guideline over on the interop side of things, and as a result there may be a new few tests incoming! 17:18:17 not a huge thing, just letting people know :) 17:18:31 mguiney: thanks for the heads up 17:18:54 it would be handy to have a note in the commit message about the tests being interop related when the patch are written 17:19:36 mguiney: do you know for what services? 17:20:39 cinder, thus far, i'm currently sussing out which new capabilities are and are not covered 17:21:06 and maybe a new one for swift 17:21:34 i'm looking forward to getting to write some new tests, should be interesting :) 17:22:00 and can do, i'll certainly note that theyre for the new capabilities :) 17:22:33 mguiney: that's nice, thank you 17:23:18 cool! well thank you for hearing me out, that's all for me! 17:24:35 anything else? 17:25:01 blancos, felipe mentioned that patrole CI was broken a lot due to tempest changes recently 17:25:12 blancos: is it any better now? 17:25:35 andreaf Yes we've been reviewing and merging patches, I think the issue has been resolved 17:25:37 Thank you 17:25:42 blancos: I was wondering it we should have a review of the APIs in tempest used by patrole that are not stable interfaces 17:25:54 blancos: ok good to hear 17:26:28 andreaf That might be a good idea 17:27:57 blancos: unless there is a need for it I don't plan to mark more tempest interfaces as stable (after test.py is done) - so if Patrole needs something it would be good to know about it 17:28:29 andreaf I'll have to look them over and get back to you on which ones we might need 17:28:39 cool, thank you! 17:29:15 ok, unless there is something else, I would give everyone 30min back of your lives, and close the meeting here ^_^ 17:30:01 ok thanks everyone! have a great day 17:30:06 #endmeeting