17:00:23 #startmeeting qa 17:00:23 Meeting started Thu Jul 21 17:00:23 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is oomichi_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:28 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:00:30 hi, - who's here today? 17:01:05 Hi I'm here 17:01:22 jlwhite: hi 17:01:44 I don't want to go out of order 17:02:07 but I wanted to get eyes on my change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/341083/, thanks for checking it out 17:02:11 oomichi_ 17:02:45 jlwhite: I reviewed it 5 mins before :) 17:02:59 jlwhite: that seems good direction for me 17:03:00 :) yep I saw! 17:03:06 I will respond on there 17:03:15 jlwhite: thanks 17:03:27 o/ 17:03:48 There are more working items it effects about 12 test 17:03:55 ok, let's start te meeting 17:04:01 cool 17:04:29 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_July_21th_2016_.281700_UTC.29 17:04:35 ^^^ is today agenda 17:05:09 #topic Newton priorities 17:05:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-qa-newton-priorities 17:06:06 We are working based on this priorities and that seems good progress 17:06:46 yes, luzc and I have started on the one for validation resources as mentioned above 17:07:00 jlwhite: yeah, that is important one 17:07:17 it would make debug easy more 17:07:37 oomichi_ I agree, I wanted to make everything explicit 17:07:42 In the test module 17:07:44 jlwhite: how many patches we need for that ? 17:08:08 jlwhite: I guess we need many patches for finishing that 17:08:16 oomichi_ it affects about 12 test 17:08:26 oomichi_ yep 17:08:54 jlwhite: umm, ok. I'd like to keep my eyes on that 17:09:04 oomichi_ so I think I will have to submit the all in one over many adjustments 17:09:26 oomichi_ if I make the change all the test that rely on resource validation will faile 17:09:29 *fail 17:09:35 oomichi_ or is there another way? 17:09:48 jlwhite: now we don't have branch topic for this work, and it is a little hard to find patches on gerrit 17:10:49 oomichi_ should I make an adjustment to the Topic? 17:11:11 jlwhite: it would be nice to do that 17:11:35 oomichi_ on it :), "Validation Resources'? 17:11:54 jlwhite: it is nice to add more patches on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:valResources 17:12:07 jlwhite: as the same topic later 17:12:39 jlwhite: one single huge patch is hard to be reviewed ;) 17:12:59 oomichi_ got it :) true because then it would be tough for people 17:13:19 oomichi_ I will keep the topic and make multiple patches as suggested 17:13:20 jlwhite: yeah, thanks in advance 17:13:32 @oomichi_ right now there is only one patch to review the flow/ and the refactor (for test class, base classes and the other test modules 17:13:33 oomichi_ thanks! no problem at all 17:14:08 luzC: ok, thanks for the info. I am looking forward to seeing more 17:14:14 cool 17:14:16 :) 17:14:30 do we have more topic about newton priorities? 17:14:59 ok, next topic 17:15:04 #topic Specs Reviews 17:15:21 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/qa-specs,n,z 17:15:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/qa-specs+status:open 17:16:00 we have 4 specs now 17:16:29 all patches are red now 17:16:44 I need to update the first one related to resource 17:17:01 I forgot to do that because of different owner, sorry 17:17:31 I guess we don't have enough topic about this now 17:17:59 or do we have? 17:18:22 ok, let's move on 17:18:27 #topic Tempest 17:18:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 17:18:58 ^^^ now we still have many patches for tempest 17:19:35 and I will review them after the meeting 17:19:53 do we have any patches we need to discuss here? 17:20:46 I don't think so, I'll review some of them too 17:20:54 yes, me as well 17:20:58 luzC: cool, thanks 17:21:10 jlwhite: thank you too :) 17:21:19 ok, let's move on 17:21:36 #topic devstack + grenade 17:22:19 I don't have enough topic about these also this week 17:22:38 anyone have about them? 17:22:53 none on my end 17:23:27 ok, next topic 17:23:44 #topic openstack-health 17:24:12 active developers are off on this meeting 17:24:34 and this also I don't have enough items :-( 17:25:16 let's more on 17:25:30 #topic Critical Reviews 17:25:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/341083/ 17:26:05 jlwhite: we had converstation already in this meeting :) 17:26:16 oomichi_ yep :) 17:26:21 jlwhite: we need to do more? 17:26:41 oomichi_ as long as the flow is on the right path I am good to move forward 17:27:17 oomichi_ so I will monitor gerrit for reviews and make adjustements 17:27:19 jlwhite: cool, I will check patches in the future after posting 17:27:35 jlwhite: that would be great to help us 17:27:36 oomichi_ thanks! 17:28:26 I have one patch I want to pick up: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/344827/ 17:28:45 that is good to test a new microversion of nova 17:29:06 more reviews are nice to move forward 17:29:21 cool, will put eyes on it 17:29:25 oomichi_ 17:29:34 are there more patches to be need to review soon? 17:29:46 jlwhite: thanks again 17:30:49 ok, the final topic 17:30:55 #topic Open Discussion 17:31:50 are there open topic here? 17:32:31 oh, I have one 17:32:58 just reminder: we have the code sprint in this development cycle in Germany 17:33:31 Please register on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/QAInfraNewtonSprint if interested in joining :) 17:33:32 When is it again oomichi_? 17:33:37 oh thanks 17:34:20 most people love to go to Germany based on the experience of the first QA/Infra meetup 17:35:22 do we have more items here? 17:35:34 or nice to review patches :) 17:35:51 by finishing the meeting earlier 17:36:13 ok, let's finish the meeting 17:36:16 #endmeeting