17:05:33 #startmeeting qa 17:05:34 Meeting started Thu Mar 28 17:05:33 2013 UTC. The chair is davidkranz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:05:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:05:37 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:05:54 hi 17:06:13 #topic reviews 17:06:52 Any comments about anything in https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest,n,z 17:07:31 davidkranz: am now 17:07:38 sorry, got back late from lunch 17:07:43 sdague: np 17:08:04 I am not sure how much there is to discuss today 17:08:26 We are pretty well set with the summit sessions based on last week's discussion 17:08:50 We should be able to schedule them next week when the tool is ready. 17:09:30 Any one know the current story on the full quantum failures? 17:09:37 davidkranz: one more proposal was put up yesterday on scenario tests 17:09:55 that is unreviwed . need to approve/reject 17:10:00 Is the Quantum tests still a problem? 17:10:13 zyluo: the quantum full tests still don't complete 17:10:14 I found the cause of the Quantum test failure and thought I fixed it submitting a patch to Nova 17:10:24 ravikumar_hp: I had not seem it. 17:10:37 zyluo: Is the patch merged? 17:10:46 Yes its merged. 17:10:48 ravikumar_hp: I feel like it duplicates some of the other sessions. 17:11:06 sdague, and I tried it on my vanilla installation 17:11:08 davidkranz: dtroyer got in the grenade one right? 17:11:19 sdague: Yes 17:11:46 Adding user scenario tests to Tempest by Masayuki Igawa 17:11:55 sdague: I agree. I think if we feel like there's still more to discuss, we could do it in an unconference 17:12:53 zyluo: The full quantum run is failing with a bunch of security group failures. 17:13:13 Can you show us a link? 17:13:48 zyluo: Actually other failures as well http://logs.openstack.org/24426/5/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-quantum-full/1037/console.html 17:14:43 zyluo: it's on every change anywhere in gerrit 17:15:08 davidkranz: as I said to sdague last week, there are several things broken with quantum full. We need to work them one by one 17:15:27 yep 17:15:29 mlavalle, Is the quantum client version have anything to do with this? 17:15:34 davidkranz: right now I have a patch set addressing one of the problems 17:15:56 mlavalle: OK. zyluo had suggested maybe it should have been working is all. 17:16:24 mlavalle: I think we have the status which is that workk continues but we are not yet there. 17:16:40 zyluo: yep, we are not there yet 17:17:15 #topic Open Discussion 17:17:22 ravikumar_hp: it's my suggesting(scenario test). duplicated others? 17:17:25 Any one else have anything to bring up? 17:17:53 davidkranz: the only thing I wanted to bring up is do we have a plan for backporting any changes into milestone-proposed? 17:18:09 mtreinish: I don't think so 17:18:28 sdague: Has stable/grizzly been cut yet? 17:19:21 davidkranz: I don't think it has 17:19:33 that's why asked about backporting any changes while we still can 17:19:39 davidkranz: we're got milestone-proposed 17:19:56 so we now have a milestone-proposed branch, which all the RCs are testing against 17:19:57 mtreinish: Are you proposing something in particular? 17:20:05 so effectively master is havana now 17:20:25 davidkranz: no I haven't been following the review queue carefully enough this past week 17:20:28 so that protects us from breaking changes in master 17:20:42 and we can cut to stable propper when the main projects do 17:20:51 but I thought it was worth bringing up if someone saw something that was worth considering 17:21:27 mtreinish: I don't think so but we can always backport something to stable if we want to. 17:23:19 Anything else? 17:23:41 nothing from me 17:23:58 OK, going once. 17:24:23 I guess that's it. 17:24:28 See you all next week. 17:24:31 +1 17:24:37 cool. See you guys next week. :-) 17:24:44 bye 17:24:48 bye 17:24:49 bye everyone 17:24:54 #endmeeting