17:05:09 #startmeeting qa 17:05:10 Meeting started Thu Sep 20 17:05:09 2012 UTC. The chair is davidkranz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:05:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:05:12 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:05:17 jaypipes: Did you get what I sent this weekend? 17:05:45 Still trying to find time to get it inside the Tempest proper framework, but I wanted to throw something out at least 17:06:00 dwalleck: this weekend? 17:06:05 dwalleck: no, I don't think so 17:06:09 jaypipes: I think 17:06:25 Unless I'm going crazy and I'm only thinking I send emails...grrr 17:07:09 frickin hell 17:07:22 "This message hasn't been sent." 17:07:28 :) 17:07:29 I love you too Outlook =P 17:08:26 there, that's how to send a real email 17:08:40 hehe 17:09:07 dwalleck: Are you sending just to Jay or the list? 17:09:14 dwalleck: rock on. I will forward to torandu 17:09:23 dwalleck: might as well send to list, eh? 17:09:49 Original was to just Jay. I can send it to everyone if you don't mind it's not in the Tempest framework. This is just a proof of concept 17:10:03 dwalleck: Understood. 17:11:02 I've been trying to push through the reviews currently on deck 17:11:15 I don't want folks to continuously have to rebase 17:11:24 dwalleck: Thanks for that. 17:12:18 Plus hopefully once I finish reviews, I'll write some of my own code :) 17:12:41 I think that's probably what I'll use half the conference for. Live coding damnit! 17:12:42 dwalleck: I asked Sean to look into the code review backlog -- and if I get through some of the things on my plate today, I'll give it a try as well 17:13:31 We do seem to have some pretty significant XML coverage now. Those guys really went all out 17:14:12 dwalleck: Yeah. That's great. 17:14:38 eglynn_: Do you know anything about that ticket where a nova return code changed from 404 to 400 (or not)? 17:15:15 davidkrankz: Was that in test_authorization? One of my guys mentioned something along those lines yesterday 17:16:07 dwalleck: There were two of them. One was actually changed and is fine now. The other is the problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/963248 17:16:08 Launchpad bug 963248 in nova "Return code for rebuild with non-existent image changed" [Undecided,Invalid] 17:16:24 See the last comment. 17:16:55 davidkranz: I don't know how the regression crept in, the original change to the response code was quite a while ago 17:17:58 eglynn_: But it seems that it didn't change and is still returning 404 based on the recent gating run after tempest was changed but failed. 17:18:31 eglynn_: Is it possible that a different part of the server code is involved? 17:19:03 davidkranz: when did the tempest test start failing, last couple days, or? 17:19:38 It only fails when the tempest test is changed to expect 400 and unskipped. See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12994/ 17:21:05 davidkranz: a-ha, I see ... lemme look into the history 17:21:14 eglynn_: OK, thanks. 17:22:08 Any one have any other items to discuss? 17:22:22 Can the conference be tomorrow? 17:22:34 And have full kegs in each room? :) 17:22:47 dwalleck: :) 17:23:10 Just kidding. Just looking forward to getting back in a room with you guys to brainstorm 17:23:34 dwalleck: I'm looking forward to the conference as well. 17:24:02 dwalleck: Are full kegs in each room a change to the conference format? 17:24:38 eh, who knows =P 17:24:57 Well, I'll get myself back to code reviews then if there's nothing else 17:25:30 Is the idea still that we'll take the time at the conference to discuss various options on runners and such? 17:25:56 I didn't try to schedule any time as it seemed that unconferences worked better last time 17:26:58 dwalleck: I think it would be hard to formalize this enough right now for an actual conference session. 17:28:46 If that is all I will close the meeting. 17:30:08 sounds good 17:30:19 #endmeeting