09:02:56 #startmeeting ptl_sync 09:02:57 Meeting started Tue Jan 6 09:02:56 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:02:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:03:00 #topic Heat 09:03:00 The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' 09:03:03 happy holidays 09:03:20 and happy new year! 09:03:31 #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/kilo-2 09:03:54 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401317 - is a dup 09:04:04 we just found that out 09:04:18 I see only 4 blueprints there -- expecting more specs to be approved ? 09:04:38 ttx: i well expect 09:04:51 i think i need to do some admin 09:05:11 make sure approved ones have the right settings 09:05:35 been caught out by ttx's sharp eye 09:05:43 yes, just add more BPs to match the work being done 09:06:01 ok, will do 09:06:06 less than one month to k2 :) 09:06:20 yikes already 09:06:27 pesky holidays 09:06:41 so ideally the spec view for k2 should be nearly complete by next week 09:07:07 ok, I'll sort that out 09:08:01 We'll discuss log guidelines at the cross-project meeting tomorrow 09:08:08 did you have questions ? 09:08:16 all good from my side 09:08:58 alright then, have a good catch-up week 09:09:12 thx 09:19:06 johnthetubaguy: o/ 09:19:14 ttx: hi 09:19:17 #topic Nova 09:19:30 johnthetubaguy: did you enjoy the holiday season ? 09:19:54 ttx: I had a good break, hope you had a good one too? 09:20:30 I did! Managed to stay mostly off for 12 days, which is my personal best 09:20:49 #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/kilo-2 09:20:56 :) 09:20:58 That *is* a busy list 09:21:06 yeah, its pure madness 09:21:25 slightly self inflicted, as we said juno-3 is for priority things only 09:21:36 (plus usual exception process) 09:21:40 would it make more sense to start asking assignees if they expect their stuff to land in k2 or k3 ? 09:21:49 oh, I se 09:21:49 e 09:22:36 yeah, its an experiment, to have a six week Feature Freeze, as we got good at merging things last time 09:22:41 I'll do a quick tour of the "unknown" status ones to turn them into STarted/Notstarted based on references posted 09:22:55 ttx: ah, superstar, that would be good 09:23:04 If you could tour the unassigned ones and set a reasonable assignee for them? 09:23:14 ttx: sure 09:23:44 the needs code review stuff is the stuff I think has the most promise, its a shame its all low priority, well, almost 09:25:05 hmm, actually I need to check if the linked stuff is not just the spec 09:25:10 * ttx redoes 09:27:54 oh, doh, good point 09:29:30 ok done 09:29:57 * ttx crosschecks with http://status.openstack.org/release/ 09:31:30 assignees should be sorted now too 09:31:47 OK looks good 09:32:08 yeah, I need to send out an email about the dates and the current juno-3 plan 09:32:12 Would be good to beat the drum to get the priority items started 09:32:16 but we were hoping to have a drivers or nova-meeting first 09:32:21 yes, very true 09:32:31 otherwise looks good 09:33:01 the cells stuff is queued behind the testing working they are doing, its not forgotten, but yeah, there is stuff to do 09:33:02 on a more personal note, I pushed the discussion on normalization of specs process at a recent cross-project meeting 09:33:22 You can read the logs, but the overall feedback was that there wasn't much to standardize 09:33:27 * ttx fetches logs 09:33:32 yes, apologies I can't make those, it just doesn't work with stuff at home 09:33:50 OK, thats a perfectly fine outcome 09:33:56 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2014/crossproject.2014-12-09-21.03.log.html#l-12 09:34:10 The biggest changes were probably for us in Nova stopping forcing people to write docs up front 09:34:18 since that was an action item from the "specs" cross-project session, let me know if you think there is more to do at this point 09:34:20 I was glad for that change to be made 09:35:21 questions on your side ? 09:35:37 ttx: I still need to update the wiki page to include nova stuff, sorry, but that looks good I think 09:35:56 ok then 09:36:03 have a good day and a good week! 09:36:09 my aim was to make sure we didn't all go crazy, and it seems like we are mostly simlar, so thats cool 09:36:14 ttx: thanks, and you! 13:00:01 ttx: knock, knock, ready when you are ... 13:00:06 eglynn: o/ 13:00:10 #topic Ceilometer 13:00:16 #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/kilo-2 13:00:29 eglynn: how was your holiday break? 13:00:51 good, good, and your's? 13:01:13 was nice, managed to disconnect completely for 10+ days, which was pretty nice 13:01:21 coolness :) 13:01:29 Those 5 "blocked" are pending spec approval, I gather ? 13:01:31 but, back to reality this week ... 13:01:44 yeah I've been populating the k2 roster with BPs blocked on specs reviews 13:01:54 ++ 13:01:56 we need to restart some conversations to get those over the line 13:02:09 indeed, fels like restarting a cold engine 13:02:21 yeap, somewhat of a hiatus around the holidays, loses the momentum 13:02:54 woul dbe good to unblock those asap as k2 hits in less than a month now :) 13:03:16 yeap, k2 first week in Feb 13:03:17 No question on my side 13:03:33 so I'll push to get all those specs reviewslanded this week 13:03:39 we'll discuss currently proposed openstack-specs at the cross-project meeting today 13:03:40 cool 13:03:58 nice 13:04:02 eglynn: have a good restart week 13:04:13 you too, thanks for your time! 13:04:28 dhellmann: we skip sergey today, so ping me when you're ready to go 13:07:35 ttx: here 13:09:17 dhellmann: o/ 13:09:20 #topic Oslo 13:09:36 https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/kilo-2 13:09:46 and https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/next-kilo 13:11:27 we have several to retarget 13:11:49 I'll do that for the ones I know about today, and I've asked for updates from everyone by our meeting monday 13:11:50 yeah, probably a good idea to defer early those who won't be done by end of month anyway 13:12:29 are all the unknowns in kilo-2 actually not started ? If yes I can update that for you 13:13:09 yes, I think "not started" is more accurate for those 13:13:15 ok, processing 13:14:26 ok, no real question at this point, expecting we'll have a little bit more accurate picture by next week 13:15:26 yeah, I'll get this cleaned up by then. I didn't want to push for answers over the holiday 13:15:54 dhellmann: we'll be discussing log guidelines at the cross-project meeting today, to trigger reviews there 13:16:21 because otherwise it won't ever reach critical mass 13:16:21 ok, good -- that one has lingered too long 13:16:44 we just need to give a "comment now or forever hold your peace" warning 13:17:15 * dhellmann nods 13:17:18 I don't expect *every* PTL to vote on it anyway, they just need a fair warning 13:17:38 so hopefully that should unclog the pipe there 13:17:44 dhellmann: have a great week! 13:17:48 talk to you later 13:17:55 thanks, you too! 15:07:10 mestery: ready when you are 15:07:13 ttx: o/ 15:07:28 #topic Neutron 15:07:34 #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/kilo-2 15:07:59 Those "blocked" are, I assume, waiting on spec approval 15:08:14 No, they are approved, but have no code submitted yet. Should I use a different state there? 15:08:16 Otherwise it's neat progress overall 15:08:25 You should use Not started 15:08:31 Ah, right, I'll correct that 15:08:37 or if work started but no code submitted for review yet, you can use started 15:08:55 ack 15:09:25 * mestery fixes those up quickly 15:10:52 Done 15:11:11 even better 15:11:16 Heh 15:11:20 that answers all questions I had 15:11:40 Cool, I've been keeping everyone aware of the deadline for Kilo-2, and how quickly it's coming now that the holidays are done. 15:11:49 We'll mention nova-net to neutron migration in the cross-project meeting today 15:11:58 you might want to be around 15:12:13 I'll be there, but there won't be much to report yet, Oleg is still on holiday in Russia I believe. 15:12:17 May make sense to move that to next week when we'll have more to say there. 15:12:22 But either way, an update is fine 15:12:32 sure, update can be -- waiting on Oleg 15:12:42 just wantr to make sure we don't wait on other resources 15:12:43 lol 15:12:50 like a nova liaison 15:12:59 or support from ops 15:13:04 Good idea 15:13:13 And thanks for helping to get this more visilbility! 15:13:33 questions on your side ? 15:14:01 Nothing at this time, we're just plowing ahead in Kilo-2 now. 15:14:02 Thanks ttx! 15:14:08 alright, talk to you later 15:14:13 have a great week! 15:14:19 nikhil_k: ready when you are 15:14:25 ready 15:14:30 #topic Glance 15:14:42 #link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/kilo-2 15:15:05 about smooth-deletes-over-time: can I switch it to "not started" ? 15:15:15 or is it started 15:15:49 it's in discussion 15:16:03 the guy has been active and discussing design with us 15:16:09 ok, implementation:not started is probably more accurate then 15:16:12 sure 15:16:27 I like to keep "unknown" for when we have no idea 15:16:52 Do you expect a lot more blueprints to show up in that k2 landscape ? 15:16:59 yes ttx 15:17:04 around 10 or so 15:17:20 What's their current status ? Waiting on spec approval ? 15:17:33 we are keeping a informal freeze 2 weeks after k2 15:17:50 so, based on who has started working on the the implementation the specs are getting processed 15:18:14 otherwise we have a review queue build up near the close of k2 15:18:19 hmm, ok... so we should expect more stuff to appear in the coming weeks 15:18:44 right, hope to see at least 4 specs in the next week and half 15:18:49 whenever you're pretty sure something is coming, just add it to the mix. If the spec is not approved yet (but will most likely be) you can add the blueprint with status: Blocked 15:19:00 that sounds good 15:19:47 alright, that's all I had.. questions on your side ? 15:20:03 nothing this week :) 15:20:12 cool then talk to you later 15:20:17 cya 15:20:27 Thanks, bye. 15:30:10 thingee: o/ 15:30:20 ttx: hi! 15:30:23 #topic Cinder 15:30:32 #link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/kilo-2 15:31:05 Lots of "unknown" in there, let me see if I can clarify them 15:31:20 chiscsi-iscsi-helper looks Not started 15:31:37 same for assisted-snapshot-improvements 15:31:50 yeah the assignee has been reached out to for an update. I will be removing it this week otherwise 15:32:01 same for all actually 15:32:09 will move them to "Not started" now 15:32:19 eric is part of core. forgot to reach out to him yesterday in irc to update those or a plan to divide up his work to k-3 as well 15:33:21 ok done 15:33:38 Apart from those Not started, the rest looks good 15:33:39 thank you. I'll make sure to do that for future targeted items 15:33:53 ttx: need to verify that incomplete in target bugs too 15:33:53 "unknown" should just mean "I have no idea" 15:34:07 while most of the time you have an idea and it's just the default status that stuck 15:34:33 Do you expect a lot more to be added to the k2 target, or is it mostly complete ? 15:35:05 Yeah I have one more. 15:35:08 but that should be it 15:35:35 ok good 15:35:57 I don't think I have any more questions 15:36:35 I have now targeted the other bp 15:36:35 cross-project meeting today discussing two cross-project specs 15:36:46 yes log standards will be great 15:37:00 have a great week back! 15:37:09 thank you, you too 15:37:32 * ttx starts to wonder if we could not replace 1:1 syncs with more asynchronous pings on this channel 15:38:12 david-lyle: ready when you are 15:38:54 david-lyle: ready when you are 15:39:00 ttx: ready 15:39:43 #topic Horizon 15:40:27 #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/kilo-2 15:40:41 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/launch-instance-redesign appears to be unassigned 15:41:10 There are 5 blueprints with undefined priority to process, too 15:41:38 david-lyle: Should I just turn all "unknwon" to "not started" ? 15:41:45 unknown* 15:41:51 ttx: was walking through them now 15:42:04 some already are up for review 15:42:18 I'll finish walking through them after this 15:42:55 I'll add an owner for the redesign. It's being actively worked by several people 15:43:29 ok, I'll let you clear that all up 15:44:11 that's a lot of blueprints compared to the 9 you got in in k1 15:44:26 but I guess a lot of those are postponed items 15:44:43 yeah, a lot that just missed k-1 15:44:54 so would be great to get those in early 15:45:00 now that people are back from holiday, I expect several to land shortly 15:45:09 That's about all I had -- questions on your side ? 15:45:23 no, I'm set 15:45:32 alright then. Talk to you later! 15:45:39 see you later 16:58:00 notmyname: around? 17:01:19 morganfainberg: around? 17:01:25 ttx, o. 17:01:29 erm o/ 17:01:34 #topic Keystone 17:01:46 #link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/kilo-2 17:01:58 happy new year 17:01:58 2 unassigned blueprints in there 17:02:14 hope you had a good break 17:02:15 cadf should be assigned, that'll be taken care of today 17:02:23 as will the other one 17:02:32 those need house keeping, but people are working on them. 17:02:46 should I set all 3 "unknown" to "not started", or will you clarify ? 17:02:52 i'll clarify 17:03:13 OK... are you expecting a lot more BPs to show up in the next week(s) ? 17:03:23 yes, i expect more to show up this week 17:03:35 much beyond that i expect k3 to see the last of them appear 17:03:43 ok. Don't hesitate to list the ones you're waiting for spec approval on as "Blocked" 17:03:48 will do. 17:04:04 alright then, no more questions -- did you have any ? 17:04:32 nothing at this time, still getting back into the swing of things post holidays 17:04:42 indeed 17:04:54 ok then, have a good week! 17:05:03 devananda: ready when you are 17:05:18 ttx: here 17:05:22 ttx: o/ 17:05:32 Let's slip notmyname in those extra 5 min 17:05:36 #topic Swift 17:05:48 I've been out and I'm catching up 17:06:12 4 of us (core devs) are working on EC stuff in the office yesterday and today 17:06:14 I had a good break so things are a bit fuzzy in my mind, but I seem to remember we considered some release for end of january 17:06:29 otherwise, we've got some patches that will land for a next release...yeah 17:06:47 I'll let you know when those are good and give you a head's up on timing as soon as I know it 17:06:56 sounds good 17:07:20 I'll be traveling a bit end of Jan / start of Feb 17:07:25 (for work) 17:07:41 I'll be at LCA next week 17:07:41 hmm...looks like 6am there now, so I probably can still do the update 17:07:54 ok 17:08:05 notmyname: we can skip next week, I won't make you get up at 6am for 2 min of update 17:08:11 heh, ok 17:08:18 thanks :-) 17:08:27 I think that's all I've got for this week 17:08:45 or we can ping more randomly. Actually was thinking we could drop the concept of scheduled pings since we don't have that much to communicate 17:08:58 (not just you, everyone) 17:09:19 the only real moment we need sync is around releases/milestones 17:09:23 I think the scheduled stuff is good. and offers less chance for communication failures later 17:09:31 I'd prefer to keep them (for everyone) 17:09:35 ok, that's good feedback 17:09:51 have a great week! 17:09:54 it's at least a time when we both know the other is online 17:09:56 you too! 17:09:59 devananda: still around? 17:11:03 ttx: yup 17:11:40 #topic Ironic 17:12:46 #link https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/kilo-2 17:13:08 folks are still trickling back in after the holiday break 17:13:09 Will set https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/non-glance-image-refs to "started" since work seems to have happened there 17:13:36 we had our first post-new-year meeting last night, which is also part of our attempt to split meetings across time zones 17:13:46 how did that go ? 17:13:48 so far, I'm not convinced it's going well (the meeting time split, that is) 17:14:23 devananda: yeah, it's a difficult balance. You want to be inclusive, but not split them to the point where they are not reaching critical mass either 17:14:30 0500 UTC meetings are hard for US west coast people. we lose all the US east. EU don't attend either. 17:14:50 so we get a few sleepy US west, plus china/japan/korea/australia 17:14:51 damn earth for being round 17:14:56 right? 17:15:35 i'm curious if other teams have tried this and gone back to a single time 17:16:01 devananda: that's a good question for the cross-project meeting open discussion today 17:16:11 duly noted 17:16:34 on the topic of mid cycle 17:16:55 i'm trying to make it clear to folks that this is a sprint, not planning -- but it's pretty clear we're going to be split 17:17:19 yeah, felt that way on the ML 17:18:08 I don't have a lot of project updates at this point 17:18:22 devananda: do you expect a lot more specs to make it to the k2 page soon ? 17:18:34 a few, but not many 17:18:56 ok no more questions from me, anything else ? 17:19:20 there are a lot of open specs, but most are blocked by other work and either late additions to k3, or more likely won't make it this cycle 17:19:39 nope 17:19:43 cheers :) 17:19:44 Cool, have a great day and week then 17:19:53 SlickNik: ready when you are 17:20:03 o/ 17:20:08 #topic Trove 17:20:13 #link https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/kilo-2 17:20:32 Looks pretty good, most code already in review 17:20:38 expecting a lot more to come ? 17:20:41 Chugging along trying to get the BPs for kilo-2 reviewed. 17:20:54 Expecting a couple more to show up, but not much else. 17:21:19 Should be in during the next week/two as well. 17:21:52 ok, no more questions from me 17:22:00 questions on your side ? 17:22:12 Will keep the BPs updated — a couple are close to merging. 17:22:19 None so far. 17:22:30 OK then, have a good back-from-holiday week 17:22:39 Thanks! 17:22:40 #endmeeting