21:24:51 #startmeeting ptl_sync 21:24:51 Meeting started Tue Sep 9 21:24:51 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:24:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:24:55 #topic Nova 21:24:55 The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' 21:24:58 https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-rc1 21:25:31 is that list complete with all approvals? 21:25:59 I beleive so 21:26:06 I ahven't checked in the last 24 hours, but it was before 21:26:19 It should also be mostly accurate for implementation status too 21:26:24 and you set a deadline for those last Friday, so new ones should be ignored anyway 21:26:40 still on track to close them all by Friday? 21:26:40 Yep 21:26:44 Its hard to tell 21:26:47 The gate is painful 21:26:53 I can see two which need more dev work 21:26:57 And the rest need the gate to agree 21:27:06 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-approved-ffes is our summary of review state 21:27:18 So, looking at that 21:27:25 virt-driver-name-placement is at risk 21:27:30 mikal: if they are gating now and don't get in by Friday I'm fine with giving them extra time :) 21:27:32 As is server-group-quotas 21:27:41 And SRIOV 21:27:51 ttx: yeah, I figured we'd sneak them in 21:27:57 OK, if you see that they are not getting in in time, defer them early rather than late 21:28:17 Sounds sensible 21:28:25 i.e. if they are not approved by Thursday... or gating by Friday... 21:28:27 It is probably a good idea for me to email -dev and remind people to be focussing on these 21:28:32 probably simpler to just defer them 21:28:56 because otherwise they will still be in progress by mid next-week 21:29:12 Agreed 21:29:15 especially if some of those are patchseries 21:29:25 those can take a long time 21:29:36 Yeah, gating is painful for those 21:30:01 So, we'll see how it goes at the end of the week 21:30:12 quick discussion on design summit 21:30:14 There is also one important bug on my radar as I mentioned in email 21:30:19 The ironic driver as landed does not work 21:30:23 There is already a fix out for review 21:30:31 oh, ok 21:30:38 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119944/ 21:30:48 Ahhh, it got approved while I slept 21:30:50 In the gate now 21:30:56 I think you'll want a full day of meetup on the Friday 21:31:18 Sorry, at the summit you mean? 21:31:20 yes 21:31:28 So, there are four summit days, yes? 21:31:36 on the Tuesday you have cross-project stuff 21:31:45 that leaves Wed/Thu 21:32:01 How does that compare with Atlanta, its the same number of slots right? 21:32:05 where my original plan was to give you two full days of scheduled slots 21:32:09 yes 21:32:16 Ahhh, two days not three? 21:32:30 well, the third is replaced by the meetup, so same time together 21:32:39 Holdup 21:32:40 I'm confused now 21:32:43 What is the meetup? 21:32:53 ok, /me rewinds 21:33:11 on the wed/Thu we'll have traditional slots 21:33:16 Ok 21:33:27 i.e. 40-min, with a predetermiend theme and present on schedule 21:33:48 on the Friday, all teams will have a half-day or a full-day "contributors meetup" 21:34:04 that's a big block of time that they can organize how they see fit 21:34:16 usually with an etherpad full of themes to discuss 21:34:22 midcycle-meetup style 21:34:33 no "slots", no 40-min bell 21:34:40 Ahhh, cool 21:34:40 Ok 21:34:45 In that case I've changed my mind 21:34:53 And I want all the slots I can get on the two non-meetup days 21:34:59 ok 21:35:07 If we didn't have the meetup I'd want to spread them out over the three days 21:35:14 But that doesn't sound like an option here 21:35:16 Ideally you would use the Friday to get alignment on a Kilo plan 21:35:52 and solve "team problems" 21:36:04 I think that's a good idea 21:36:09 but it's really up to you, and can change at last minute 21:36:09 I just somehow missed that it was the plan 21:36:31 let's say it was just a thought, but I talked with our event partner and it may actually be possible 21:36:41 we'll need to revamp the space between Thursday and Friday 21:36:49 Ahhh yeah 21:36:56 Tables and stuff instead of just 200 chairs 21:37:01 Fair enough 21:37:02 so that there are a lot of parallel spaces, and tables 21:37:20 we might have LCDs to be able to show up stuff 21:37:38 rather than prjector/screen combos 21:37:45 And whiteboards? 21:37:49 Whiteboards would be good 21:38:04 actually the paperboards double as whiteboards. I asked that we have several of them 21:38:19 so you could in theory build a large whiteboard 21:38:27 LOLK 21:38:29 Ok 21:38:52 apparently large whiteboards would be difficult to se up 21:39:02 they don't really come with wheels 21:39:13 I could bring some wheels? 21:39:27 But either way, it sounds like we're agreed here and I should let you go home? 21:39:38 you should let me jump into my bed yes 21:39:52 thanks for your time! 21:39:57 #endmeeting