21:03:27 <ttx> #startmeeting project
21:03:28 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 15 21:03:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:03:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:03:31 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'project'
21:03:44 <stevebaker> \o
21:04:13 <ttx> Hi everyone, last release meeting of the Icehouse cycle
21:04:19 <stevebaker> \o/
21:04:21 <ttx> NB: Next week we'll use that meeting slot to discuss Design Summit scheduling with all PTLs
21:04:30 <ttx> But for today we need to check we are still all good for release on Thursday
21:04:42 <ttx> agenda:
21:04:43 <ttx> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
21:04:51 <ttx> #topic Two days before release
21:05:09 <ttx> well, less than two days, since release is planned for ~1400 UTC
21:05:12 <annegentle> whoohoo
21:05:22 <ttx> I synced with almost everyone today and we seem to be in good shape
21:05:37 <ttx> stevebaker: how is Heat RC2 holding up ?
21:06:05 <ttx> no bug in https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bugs?field.tag=icehouse-rc-potential so I assume it's good
21:06:26 <stevebaker> ttx: testing has been fine so far, no major new bugs have been raised
21:06:31 <ttx> I just respun Ceilometer RC3
21:06:32 <sdague> are we going to get another keystone client release RSN? there was a pretty nasty bug we tripped over in heat once we made the tests parallel.
21:06:36 <ttx> due to a misnamed meter
21:06:43 <sdague> it was actually a keystoneclient bug though
21:06:44 <ttx> dolphm: ^
21:06:57 <ttx> No RC window is currently open, so the current release candidates are all considered good to go
21:07:06 <stevebaker> I thought keystoneclient was already released with a fix for that
21:07:13 <dolphm> sdague: which bug?
21:07:21 <ttx> jgriffith: do you want a RC3 over bug 1304115 ?
21:07:23 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1304115 in cinder "Storwize/SVC driver crashes when check volume copy status" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1304115
21:07:34 <sdague> the certificate race
21:07:38 <jgriffith> ttx: You mean a 4
21:07:44 <ttx> arh, damn you
21:07:45 <dolphm> we haven't released a fix for that, but i'd be more than happy to
21:07:46 <ttx> RC4
21:07:57 <jgriffith> I know the IBM folks would like it
21:08:11 <sdague> Bug 1285833 - Keystone client racing on certificate lookups causing 401 Unauthorized on API calls
21:08:13 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1285833 in heat "Keystone client racing on certificate lookups causing 401 Unauthorized on API calls" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1285833
21:08:15 <dolphm> it'd be 0.8.0 though, as we've had some features land
21:08:15 <ttx> jgriffith: did you determine if it was a regression ?
21:08:32 <jgriffith> ttx: I never heard back from jungleboy... just pinged him again
21:08:40 <sdague> dolphm: that's fine, just without that if you hit heat with 2 apis at the same time you get a 401
21:08:56 <dolphm> sdague: i'll do it in the next 24 hours then
21:08:57 <ttx> jgriffith: ok, let's quickly sync after meeting and make a final call
21:09:01 <dolphm> (release 0.8.0)
21:09:06 <sdague> dolphm: great, thanks
21:09:17 <ttx> At this point, only regressions with obviously-safe fixes would be accepted in a RC respin
21:09:26 <ttx> The goal is to officialize the last RCs, tag and upload them on Thursday morning.
21:09:35 <ttx> So if by Wednesday evening you haven't pressed the "stop the presses" button I'll just proceed
21:09:47 <ttx> Known issues that are not worth a respin (or were detected too late) should be documented in the release notes
21:09:52 <ttx> But that's the next topic
21:09:59 <ttx> Do we have questions on release ? Any red flag ?
21:10:10 <sdague> ttx: on something like the keystone client issue, we'll just handle it as a requirements bump backport?
21:10:26 <sdague> or more importantly, how should we handle that?
21:10:36 <ttx> sdague: we'll probably bump the req when stable/icehouse will be cut on that repo
21:10:37 <annegentle> I dont' have a red flag but the docs will be publishing to both /trunk/ and /icehouse/ for a few weeks to avoid many backports
21:10:59 <sdague> ttx: ok
21:11:07 <annegentle> #info openstack-manuals (install guides and config refs) will be publishing to both /trunk/ and /icehouse/ for a few weeks to avoid many backports
21:11:12 <stevebaker> if there are requirements bump backports happening I'd really like python-heatclient 0.2.9 to be included
21:11:43 <ttx> fwiw the tests should always use the latest client
21:11:49 <ttx> sdague: no ?
21:11:54 <sdague> ttx: correst
21:11:58 <sdague> they actually use git
21:12:25 <ttx> so unless there is a blocking bug the bump in stable requirements is more cosmetic
21:12:52 <sdague> yeh, the only reason I brought it up on keystoneclient, is you can't actually handle parallel requests in heat without it
21:13:14 <ttx> right
21:13:14 <sdague> we went to a 50% fail rate the moment we turned on parallel tempest on the heat job because of that race
21:13:35 <ttx> any other red flag, anything I should know ?
21:14:05 <ttx> #topic Release notes status
21:14:15 <ttx> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse
21:14:19 <ttx> Looking at current status
21:14:40 <ttx> Glance and Horizon entries are a bit light
21:14:52 <ttx> Neutron still needs ot be filled out
21:15:24 <ttx> there is a TODO in the Heat section
21:15:40 <ttx> markmcclain: ETA for your section ?
21:15:48 <stevebaker> ttx: yes, shardy needs to finish that section
21:16:12 <markmcclain> ttx: currently writing it :)
21:16:16 <ttx> ok
21:16:36 <ttx> annegentle: if you have remarks on the release notes, let us know
21:16:53 <ttx> you're the specialist ;)
21:18:24 <ttx> OK, anything else about integrated release on thursday ?
21:18:40 <annegentle> ttx: not really - reading now
21:18:44 <ttx> this is suspeciously calm
21:18:55 <ttx> #topic Incubated projects
21:19:04 <russellb> ttx: maybe we're getting good at this
21:19:09 <ttx> kgriffs, devananda: o/
21:19:11 <devananda> o/
21:19:18 <ttx> Sahara and ironic have a RC2, Marconi sill has no RC
21:19:28 <ttx> devananda: do you want me to publish you on Thursday once I'm done with the official release ? Or wait for your go-ahead first ?
21:19:37 <devananda> ttx: go for it :)
21:19:53 <ttx> devananda: ok, wil proceed unless you send me email to tell me not to
21:19:54 <devananda> ttx: we haven't had any further critical bugs reported since the ones closed in RC2
21:20:33 <ttx> SergeyLukjanov is catching some sleep, but told me earlier that Sahara RC2 is good to go
21:21:00 <devananda> I am putting up release notes here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ironic/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse
21:21:03 <ttx> status unknown for Marconi
21:21:12 <ttx> kgriffs, flaper87: around?
21:21:20 <ttx> devananda: +1
21:21:22 <flaper87> ttx: o/
21:21:41 <ttx> flaper87: do you know how far Marconi is from the RC1 tag ? Shall we still target Thursday for your release ?
21:21:57 <devananda> as a side note, we also got some install docs up recently (some clean up still ongoing)
21:22:03 <ttx> It's not a big deal if you release the day after
21:22:08 <flaper87> ttx: yes, Thursday sounds good. We don't have any pressing issue nor blocking patches
21:22:09 <devananda> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/install/ironic-install.html
21:22:11 <ttx> but if you can releae on same day, looks better
21:22:23 <ttx> flaper87: well, you still have no RC published
21:22:38 <ttx> https://launchpad.net/marconi/+milestone/icehouse-rc1
21:22:47 <jgriffith> ttx: I don't believe it is
21:22:47 <ttx> still blocked on 1287490
21:22:56 <ttx> bug 1287490
21:22:56 <jgriffith> bahh... sorry
21:22:57 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1287490 in marconi/icehouse "marconi-server crashes in no screen mode" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1287490
21:23:36 <flaper87> ttx: that shouldn't be in rc1, we talked about it in today's meeting.
21:23:51 <ttx> hmm
21:23:51 * flaper87 moves it out
21:24:08 <ttx> flaper87: so I should just cut RC1 with the current state ?
21:24:38 <flaper87> ttx: yup
21:24:41 <ttx> flaper87: that means you need to push a 2014.2 version bump on top of master. I can propose it
21:24:48 <ttx> just a sec
21:25:29 <ttx> hhm
21:25:38 <ttx> it's already bumped. hm
21:25:53 * ttx digs deeper
21:26:52 <ttx> flaper87: looks like we missed a step
21:27:25 <ttx> I shall have cut a branch and tag a RC1 12 days ago when the Juno version bump was merged
21:27:31 <flaper87> ttx: mmh :/ the one where rc1 was cut ?
21:27:45 <ttx> well, that's the thing, it was never tagged or cut
21:28:12 <flaper87> ttx: mmh, I thought Kurt had told you that the version bump was done
21:28:14 <flaper87> :/
21:28:29 <ttx> so I should probably do the branch now and then push a few backports to it before tagging rc1
21:28:37 <ttx> flaper87: tomorrow morning ?
21:28:45 <flaper87> ttx: sounds good, I'll be around
21:28:47 <ttx> flaper87: or are you in the US right now
21:29:01 <flaper87> nope, CEST for now
21:29:13 <ttx> flaper87: ok, will ping you and we'll set it right
21:29:22 <flaper87> ttx: rock on, thanks!
21:29:49 <ttx> #topic Open discussion
21:30:25 <ttx> Anything, anyone ?
21:30:51 <ttx> jgriffith: we can talk about your RC4 now
21:31:05 <ttx> so is it a regression or not ?
21:32:25 * ttx talks to himself
21:32:26 <sdague> ttx: this is an FYI for folks - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86577/2/specs/branchless-tempest.rst
21:32:28 <jgriffith> ttx: no
21:32:35 <jgriffith> ttx: likely always broke
21:32:47 <jgriffith> ttx: also it's a corner case of backends that are replicating
21:32:55 <ttx> jgriffith: ok, I'd say no RC4 then, unless we respin for more important reasons
21:33:10 <sdague> there have been a couple of threads I've put out on the ML as well on it. We're pretty sure it's going to be only positive in terms of increasing quality, but willing to field questions on it
21:33:19 <ttx> #info Info on branchless tempest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86577/2/specs/branchless-tempest.rst
21:33:40 <jogo> sdague: I am excited to see branchless tempest, I have high hopes for it
21:34:39 <ttx> anything else ?
21:34:47 <HenryG> Not sure if this is relevant, but several people testing icehouse had trouble with neutron because of https://review.openstack.org/86646
21:35:52 <ttx> you mean, until this fix ?
21:35:59 <ttx> or due to this fix ?
21:36:06 <HenryG> It's not a fix, more like missing information
21:36:30 <ttx> HenryG: might be worth adding to release notes
21:36:33 <ttx> markmcclain: ^ ?
21:36:44 <mestery> +1 to that ttx
21:37:27 <ttx> HenryG: feel free to add it to the release notes directly
21:37:36 <ttx> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Icehouse
21:37:42 <HenryG> ok
21:37:47 <ttx> on that note...
21:37:57 <ttx> #endmeeting