21:02:05 <ttx> #startmeeting project
21:02:06 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 10 21:02:05 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:02:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:02:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'project'
21:02:11 <ttx> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
21:02:23 <ttx> markmcclain[0-1] asked to go first
21:02:37 <ttx> but good things first
21:02:40 <ttx> #topic General stuff
21:02:50 <ttx> The havana-3 milestone is now behind us, and most projects are in feature freeze
21:02:59 <ttx> The goal now is for each project to come up with a clear list of release-critical bugs (bugs targeted to the havana-rc1 milestone)
21:03:09 <ttx> This is usually best done by going through all bugs and targeting the appropriate ones... then monitor the new ones filed
21:03:17 <ttx> Having a bugtriage day usually helps a lot
21:03:27 <ttx> Then when we get that list down to 0 we can create the havana release branch and tag our first release candidate
21:03:36 <ttx> Then master can be open for icehouse business
21:03:54 <ttx> Note that each project can have their RC1 at a different time (when ready). Ideally all RC1s would be out before the end of the month.
21:04:08 <ttx> FWIW I created the icehouse series and the icehouse-1 milestone so that you can start moving stuff targeted to "next" to it
21:04:18 <ttx> Questions on the RC1 process ?
21:05:02 <ttx> reference:
21:05:04 <ttx> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Cycle
21:05:14 <ttx> sdague, annegentle, mordred: news from QA/Docs/Infra programs ?
21:05:28 <mordred> ttx: we're having some issues related to six and hacking and pep8
21:05:36 <mordred> if you see them, sorry - we're working on it
21:05:52 <sdague> we're going to have our own bug triage day for Tempest on the 17th
21:05:56 <mordred> also, the infra systems are still standing after FF - so, there is that
21:06:13 <ttx> sdague: right in the middle of your cloudopen talk ?
21:06:24 <sdague> yep, well all the days were bad for me :)
21:06:30 <sdague> that's why we have a wider team
21:06:54 <ttx> is there value in trying to have a cross-project bugday ?
21:07:10 <ttx> or we should rather space them out and have each project set one up if interested ?
21:07:19 <sdague> there might be, especially on bugs that are causing gate resets
21:07:49 <sdague> we had a few of those last week, in the chaos we were mostly ploughing through, but would be good to rivisit as many as possible
21:07:58 <mordred> ++
21:08:35 <ttx> I'll ask around if other people are interested to triage bugs on that 1�th
21:08:38 <ttx> arrh
21:08:39 <ttx> 17th
21:08:40 <sdague> parallel testing held up pretty well
21:08:50 <ttx> Any other announcement before we dive into project-specific stuff ?
21:08:56 <sdague> not here
21:09:27 <ttx> then, as promised...
21:09:30 <ttx> #topic Neutron status
21:09:33 <ttx> markmcclain: hi!
21:09:38 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:09:41 <markmcclain1> Hi
21:09:55 <ttx> I count 8 standing FFEs, which is a lot (a bit too much for my taste)
21:10:08 <ttx> markmcclain1: Let's review the status and set a in-or-out deadline for each of them
21:10:23 <ttx> ipv6-feature-parity / configurable-ip-allocation ?
21:10:43 <markmcclain1> That deadline is Sunday/Monday
21:11:00 <markmcclain1> For both
21:11:32 <ttx> markmcclain1: any progress there ?
21:11:56 <ttx> haven't seen code proposed yet
21:12:04 <ttx> which makes me a bit worried
21:12:52 <markmcclain1> Yes..  There is a conflict with the pending l3 patches
21:13:20 <ttx> shall be solved soon and code proposed for review ?
21:14:17 <markmcclain1> Yes. I had hoped to have merged l3 service plugin
21:14:26 <ttx> ok. nvp-service-router / nvp-fwaas-plugin / nvp-lbaas-plugin ?
21:14:51 <markmcclain1> Pending a small cleanup of leftover prints()
21:15:07 <ttx> ok, so shall merge anytime now
21:15:12 <ttx> l2-population ?
21:15:55 <markmcclain1> L2 most at risk. Had some late concerns from a core team member. EOD tomorrow is deadline
21:16:02 <ttx> l3-router-port-relationship / quantum-l3-routing-plugin ?
21:16:47 <markmcclain1> Needs changes based on l3 service branches merge
21:17:05 <ttx> deadline ?
21:17:36 <markmcclain1> eod Thursday
21:17:46 <ttx> ok, so they should all be in by thursday except the two "High" which have until next Monday ?
21:17:57 <markmcclain1> Right
21:17:58 <ttx> markmcclain1: you have a pretty nice RC1 buglist already: is that a complete picture of your release-critical bugs ?
21:18:29 <markmcclain1> Yes
21:18:33 <ttx> cool
21:18:38 <ttx> Maybe add https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1211915 ?
21:18:39 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1211915 in neutron "Connection to neutron failed: Maximum attempts reached" [Critical,Confirmed]
21:19:19 <ttx> markmcclain1: anything else you wanted to raise ?
21:19:37 <markmcclain1> Oh I forgot to link it.. we discussed at our weekly meeting
21:19:53 <ttx> no markmc, anyone speaking for oslo ?
21:19:55 <markmcclain1> Nothing else new.. Thanks for letting me jump the line
21:20:01 <ttx> markmcclain1: thx!
21:20:09 * ttx skips oslo for now
21:20:14 <ttx> #topic Keystone status
21:20:19 <ttx> dolphm: hi!
21:20:20 <dolphm> o/
21:20:22 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:20:31 <ttx> No FFE so keystone is now feature-complete
21:20:34 <dolphm> :D
21:20:42 <ttx> that should go faster ;)
21:20:54 <ttx> 12 bugs on the RC list, is that a complete list yet ?
21:21:12 <dolphm> that's as much as i'm aware of at this point
21:21:31 <ttx> Do you need a bugtriage day to go through them all, or are they very much under control ?
21:21:43 <dolphm> i believe we're under control
21:21:57 <ttx> dolphm: great, you're all set it seems. anything you wanted to raise ?
21:22:14 <dolphm> yes..
21:22:27 <ttx> sidenote: I'll resurrect my 'road to RC' graphs that show how fast you burn your RC1 buglists
21:22:34 <dolphm> a couple of those bugs are related to our support for an identity driver per domain
21:23:12 <dolphm> which we've discovered may require a more radical fix than we're willing to land in rc1, so whether those will be fixed in RC1 is up in the air
21:23:38 <dolphm> we may wait to land a full fix in icehouse, and mark the feature as experimental w/ known issues for havana
21:23:44 <ttx> dolphm: could end up being a known bug described in the release notes, yes
21:24:03 <ttx> dolphm: anythine else ?
21:24:09 <dolphm> that should be settled by the next meeting, if anyone has questions
21:24:11 <dolphm> that's ti
21:24:12 <dolphm> it
21:24:31 <ttx> #topic Ceilometer status
21:24:33 <ttx> jd__: hey
21:24:36 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:24:40 <jd__> o/
21:24:45 <ttx> 2 FFEs:
21:24:52 <ttx> about alarm-service-partitioner: is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44751/ all there is to it ?
21:25:02 <ttx> (i.e. feature is completed when that lands ?)
21:25:22 <jd__> modulo bugs, probably
21:25:38 <jd__> I didn't ask Eglynn but the code seems to cover most of what's needed
21:25:48 <ttx> when do you expect it to be ready ?
21:26:05 <ttx> not much project over the last week
21:26:09 <ttx> progress*
21:26:18 <jd__> I don't have any date from eglynn
21:26:23 <jd__> nor set any deadline per se
21:26:25 <ttx> it's been -1ed on Sep 3
21:26:51 <jd__> ttx: our weekly meeting is in 24h so I'll check with him by then
21:26:55 <ttx> I would really like to close all FFEs by next week so that coredevs can focus on testing/bugfixing
21:27:06 <jd__> understood
21:27:10 <ttx> alarming-logical-combination: I see 3 changes up at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/alarming-logical-combination,n,z
21:27:31 <ttx> Same thing, I'm not seeing a lot of activity there
21:28:22 <jd__> yes, Mehdi has been busy on other things AFAIK
21:28:34 <jd__> same thing I'll check with him tomorrow
21:28:39 <ttx> ok, great
21:28:42 <ttx> Last thing is the RC1 buglist, which has 4 bugs at this point
21:29:04 <ttx> I suspect it's not complete yet, would be nice to come up with a clear list by next week's meeting
21:29:13 <ttx> jd__: anything you wanted to mention ?
21:29:14 <jd__> yes, didn't had time to do it yet
21:29:18 <jd__> nop, all good
21:29:23 <ttx> Questions on Ceilometer ?
21:29:37 <ttx> #topic Swift status
21:29:41 <ttx> notmyname: o/
21:29:42 <notmyname> hi
21:29:45 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.9.3
21:29:59 <notmyname> looks light, but reflects a lot of work
21:30:14 <notmyname> and most of the small stuff isn't there (eg changes to work with pypy)
21:30:17 <ttx> I set them to "medium" prio so that they all appear on http://status.openstack.org/release/
21:30:26 <notmyname> low doesn't?
21:30:51 <ttx> I think I just set them all to medium, someone must have adjusted to low :)
21:31:34 <wolfdreamer> Reported as a bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1223568
21:31:35 <notmyname> plan is to keep working for this week and next and then evaluate for RC
21:31:36 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1223568 in neutron "pep8 requirements failing" [Undecided,New]
21:31:41 <ttx> it's good to have the main features listed so that the havana marketing machine (which just woke up) can take them into account
21:31:48 <notmyname> right
21:32:10 <ttx> notmyname: sounds like a plan. I'll see you next week in person
21:32:15 <notmyname> k
21:32:17 <ttx> notmyname: anything specific you wanted to raise ?
21:32:28 <notmyname> currently working with the CI team to fix builds
21:32:38 <notmyname> something (not sure what) broke every patch this morning
21:33:14 <ttx> Questions about Swift ?
21:33:34 <ttx> #topic Glance status
21:33:39 <markwash> hey hey hey
21:33:48 <ttx> markwash: o/
21:33:56 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:34:05 <ttx> One FFE for api-v2-property-protection
21:34:14 <ttx> Should it be considered completed, or wait until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44703/ makes it ?
21:34:19 <markwash> I think we're just waiting on jenkins
21:34:32 <markwash> let's wait
21:34:41 <ttx> oh, it merged
21:34:44 <markwash> hurray!
21:34:49 * markwash is done with waiting
21:35:08 <ttx> markwash: please mark it implemented :)
21:35:11 <ttx> What's the status of your RC1 buglist ? Under construction ? complete ?
21:35:29 <markwash> under construction
21:35:43 <ttx> markwash: anything you wanted to mention ?
21:35:59 <markwash> not at the moment
21:36:15 * ttx will drink tonight to the completion of api-v2-property-protection. sad to see an old friend go
21:36:24 <ttx> Questions on Glance ?
21:36:25 <markwash> :-)
21:36:43 <ttx> #topic Cinder status
21:36:48 <jgriffith> hey hey
21:36:51 <ttx> jgriffith: hola!
21:36:55 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:37:05 <ttx> I see 4 standing FFEs
21:37:11 <jgriffith> painfully slow but getting there
21:37:30 <jgriffith> Yes, I'm going to dump https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/db-api-tests
21:37:39 <ttx> I'll raise those "Low" to "Medium" so that they appear on the release radar
21:37:51 <jgriffith> ahh... good point
21:38:02 <ttx> Could you tell me again what qemu-assisted-snapshots is pending on ?
21:38:14 <jgriffith> ttx: pending on a novaclient change
21:38:21 <jgriffith> ttx: I'd have to dig up the link again :(
21:38:24 <jgriffith> wait one
21:38:25 <russellb> novaclient change merged today
21:38:34 <russellb> do you need a novaclient release?
21:38:51 <jgriffith> russellb: Ok, that should be it
21:39:07 <jgriffith> russellb: shouldn't need push as I believe we're still running clients from trunk
21:39:13 <russellb> ok, yeah
21:39:18 <jgriffith> ttx: russellb I pinged eharney one last check
21:39:19 <russellb> just need to release it by havana release then
21:39:28 <jgriffith> russellb: :)
21:39:32 <jgriffith> PLEASE :)
21:39:33 <ttx> ok
21:39:40 * russellb nods
21:39:50 <ttx> netapp-cinder-nfs-image-cloning last patch just hit the issue mordred must be talking about
21:39:55 <jgriffith> :)
21:40:09 <ttx> jgriffith: I'll let you reverify it
21:40:11 <jgriffith> Waiting for the all clear signal and I'll send it on it's way AGAIN
21:40:19 <ttx> eql-volume-driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43944/ still under review
21:40:30 <ttx> how far is that ?
21:40:37 <jgriffith> Yeah, I need to make another pass... should be getting pretty close, we've had a few turns on it
21:40:50 <jgriffith> I've bounced it 3 times I think, they should be very close
21:41:05 <ttx> db-api-tests: this is actually not a FFE, but would be still nice if it landed early
21:41:14 <jgriffith> I'm dumping it
21:41:22 <ttx> ok
21:41:23 <jgriffith> again, I get no responses from them for days
21:41:26 <jgriffith> I'm over it
21:41:32 <ttx> jgriffith: anything else on your mind ?
21:41:40 <jgriffith> Just the LVM snap delete debacle
21:41:49 <jgriffith> I'm going to move forward with that patch
21:41:56 <jgriffith> I can repor the issues on 12.04 using it
21:42:06 <jgriffith> and i'll put the config option back in to disable for those that want it
21:42:09 <ttx> jgriffith: agreed
21:42:16 <ttx> Questions on Cinder ?
21:42:17 <jgriffith> but consulting with LVM maintainers they say that's the right way to go
21:42:40 <ttx> #topic Nova status
21:42:44 <ttx> russellb: hi!
21:42:44 <russellb> hi!
21:42:47 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:42:56 <ttx> Busy front on the FFEs but you've been resisting quite efficiently
21:43:02 <russellb> :)
21:43:03 <ttx> I see 4 standing exceptions:
21:43:10 <ttx> encrypt-cinder-volumes: this one was given until the end of this week to merge
21:43:13 <russellb> encrypted volumes is progressing well, i think it can be done this week
21:43:13 <russellb> yep
21:43:21 <ttx> There seems to be some cinder bits in there, though: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39573/
21:43:34 <ttx> jgriffith: ^
21:43:36 <jgriffith> Yes,
21:43:45 <jgriffith> I agreed to let them in if nova goes
21:43:46 <jgriffith> :)
21:43:49 <russellb> heh
21:43:49 * jgriffith passes the buck
21:43:54 <ttx> ok, just making sure it's on your radar
21:43:59 <russellb> planning on it going in this week at least
21:44:00 <jgriffith> it is, thanks
21:44:04 <russellb> some final changes being requested
21:44:08 <russellb> but they're responsive
21:44:10 <ttx> fix-libvirt-console-logging: this one is starting to worry me a bit. It's been dead for one week now
21:44:17 <russellb> yeah, no review traffic
21:44:23 <russellb> i guess i need to pester some people to review it
21:44:24 <ttx> I know it's a bugfix, but it has a high regression potential
21:44:32 <ttx> ok
21:45:01 <ttx> raising vmware-image-clone-strategy to medium
21:45:01 <russellb> and 2 low, vmware one will be fine, i think it's done
21:45:10 <ttx> so that it appears on the release map
21:45:21 <ttx> done or almost done ?
21:45:28 <ttx> (db-api-tests-on-all-backends: this one is not really a feature, so we can ignore it)
21:45:43 <russellb> test one, could just move to "ongoing"
21:45:44 <russellb> i don't really care if that makes it or not
21:45:44 <russellb> it's just tests, that's why we put it there
21:45:59 <ttx> ongoing makes sense
21:46:00 <russellb> well, code is done, just needs another +2
21:46:03 <russellb> ok cool
21:46:05 <russellb> let's do that then
21:46:13 <ttx> russellb: You've got a pretty nice list of targeted bugs.. is that a ~complete view ?
21:46:24 <russellb> no, the bug list is totally wrong :)
21:46:31 <russellb> it's full of cruft, i started clearing some out just now
21:46:46 <russellb> and we're way behind on triage
21:46:50 <russellb> i've started working on that this week
21:46:50 <ttx> how about having a nova bugtriage day ?
21:47:10 <russellb> big +1
21:47:12 <ttx> that could help
21:47:22 <russellb> i know the 17th came up
21:47:23 <ttx> maybe discuss the date at the nova meeting
21:47:25 <russellb> i wonder if i should try to get on it sooner
21:47:35 <ttx> just don't forget to communicate it out
21:47:38 <russellb> yep
21:47:45 <ttx> you could try this Friday or something
21:47:48 <russellb> yeah
21:48:00 <ttx> russellb: anything else you wanted to mention ?
21:48:00 <russellb> though i may be tied up friday personally
21:48:03 <russellb> nope don't think so
21:48:08 <ttx> Any question on Nova ?
21:48:16 <russellb> other than ... if anyone wants to help with bug triage, i'd love help!  :)
21:48:28 <russellb> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
21:48:34 <ttx> #topic Heat status
21:48:38 <ttx> shardy: o/
21:48:43 <shardy> ttx: hi
21:48:44 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:48:52 <ttx> No FFE, so you're feature-complete
21:48:59 <ttx> Nice RC list, did you go through all bugs to make it ?
21:49:03 <shardy> yup :)
21:49:08 <ttx> Now it would be great if they all had an assignee to work on them :)
21:49:35 <ttx> (can always be reassigned if need be)
21:49:36 <shardy> ttx: Yes I've reviewed the bug list and will be looking for assignees for those without at tomorrows meeting
21:50:00 <ttx> then you're all set. anything you wanted to raise ?
21:50:08 <shardy> Not atm, thanks!
21:50:10 <ttx> Questions about Heat ?
21:50:31 <ttx> #topic Horizon status
21:50:37 <ttx> gabrielhurley: o/
21:50:43 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/havana-rc1
21:50:43 <gabrielhurley> \o
21:50:53 <ttx> One standing FFE for fwaas-horizon
21:50:53 <gabrielhurley> the FWaaS BP is merging currently
21:50:59 <gabrielhurley> it's already approved
21:51:02 <gabrielhurley> just waiting on Gerrit
21:51:03 <ttx> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38724/
21:51:11 <ttx> merged
21:51:15 <gabrielhurley> oh
21:51:17 <gabrielhurley> well then
21:51:30 <gabrielhurley> BP marked implemented now
21:51:37 <gabrielhurley> and that takes care of that
21:51:43 <ttx> ah! I busted you this time
21:51:47 <gabrielhurley> exciting little flurry to get those last two in, but I'm glad we did
21:52:05 <gabrielhurley> thanks to all the Neutron and Horizon folks who worked very hard and very fast to make that happen
21:52:14 <ttx> so technically it landed before this meeting, as promised, congrats
21:52:19 <gabrielhurley> :-)
21:52:22 <gabrielhurley> I try
21:52:28 <ttx> gabrielhurley: How complete is your RC1 buglist ?
21:52:44 <ttx> looks shorter than your usual ones
21:52:59 <gabrielhurley> ummm... the ones that are on it are definitely valid. I *haven't* done a full triage on the backlog to see what should be in there that wasn't in the H3 list
21:53:08 <gabrielhurley> that's on my list for this week
21:53:13 <ttx> awesome
21:53:15 <ttx> gabrielhurley: anything you wanted to mention ?
21:53:25 <gabrielhurley> no, those FFEs and the buglist were about it
21:53:36 <ttx> gabrielhurley: thx
21:53:41 <ttx> anyone representing oslo around ?
21:54:22 <ttx> maybe markmc is still in vacation
21:54:32 <ttx> #topic Incubated projects
21:54:39 <ttx> devananda, hub_cap: hello!
21:54:47 <ttx> Any question ?
21:54:55 <devananda> hi!
21:55:19 <hub_cap> hello
21:55:28 <hub_cap> nope. im ready for rc1 to be cut tho :)
21:55:41 <ttx> hub_cap: you mean Trove is actually bug-free ?
21:55:46 <hub_cap> heck no
21:55:48 <hub_cap> i mean y es
21:55:53 <ttx> goood answer
21:55:58 <hub_cap> :)
21:56:07 <hub_cap> it means i dont have any blockers for rc1/havana
21:56:09 <hub_cap> :P
21:56:28 <hub_cap> and it means i dont fully understand the ammt of work itll be to backport (but im sure ill find out lol)
21:56:41 <devananda> ironic is not going for a release in H, so we wont have an RC
21:56:51 <ttx> hub_cap: so.. what we could do is cut the havana release branch like... tomorrow and the tag RC1 Thursday if nothing happens
21:57:02 <devananda> I'm going to be watching what hub_cap is doing, though, to prep myself for next cycle :)
21:57:11 <hub_cap> ttx fine by me!
21:57:23 <hub_cap> devananda: find a nice rock to hide behind, thats my plan
21:57:24 <ttx> devananda: the simpler for you is to consider master being icehouse now
21:57:38 <ttx> since we won't do a stable/havana branch there
21:58:00 <devananda> ttx: ack. shall i start retargeting things?
21:58:00 <hub_cap> ttx when would we open icehouse for merge given your plan above?
21:58:09 <devananda> *when shall ..
21:58:32 <ttx> devananda: I'll give it another thought after a night sleep to see if I spot an issue with doing it now
21:58:39 <ttx> and tell you tomorrow
21:58:41 <devananda> k
21:59:00 <ttx> #action ttx to cut trove havana release wednesday and the tag RC1 Thursday if nothing happens
21:59:17 <ttx> #action ttx to check that ironic can already switch to icehouse
21:59:37 <ttx> hub_cap: just after the release branch is created. Tomorrow
21:59:42 <hub_cap> okey
21:59:52 <hub_cap> the trovesters thank you ttx
22:00:06 <ttx> hub_cap: I'll ping you tomorrow about that
22:00:12 <hub_cap> <3
22:00:14 <ttx> devananda: anything else ?
22:00:28 * hub_cap whispers 'say hugs devananda'
22:00:46 <ttx> well then
22:00:47 <ttx> #endmeeting