14:01:19 #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting 14:01:19 Meeting started Tue Jan 16 14:01:19 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:22 The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' 14:01:44 \o 14:02:03 #topic In-tree Driver 14:02:06 o/ 14:02:38 Just waiting for cores and updating as reviews come in 14:02:58 we have until Friday to get everything in, as I understand it 14:03:19 efried should we ping folks again? 14:03:58 I... guess? 14:04:09 Did gibi re-review the OVS patch? 14:04:25 no. I wasn't sure if you'd already pinged him again 14:04:42 I can ping folks, I just don't want to ping folks you've already pinged and be a nuisance 14:05:50 I hit up gibi just now 14:05:52 tx 14:06:56 and stephenfin, I see. I'll let you ping folks since you're already doing that. Thanks 14:07:21 Note that mriedem is out this week (and maybe next) 14:07:35 yeah, I saw 14:08:39 alright, we'll see how it goes 14:08:41 yuh 14:08:48 next? 14:09:03 edmondsw: Are you sure it has to be this week? I thought this week was the freeze for stuff like oslo, os-vif, etc. 14:09:18 Having patches "ready" is going to make it more likely they'll still be allowed to merge after the actual freeze date. 14:09:21 pretty sure it's this week... next week is clients 14:09:45 but... there is some hope if they slip this week, as efried said 14:09:54 Jan 25th is ff: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Queens_Release_Schedule 14:10:04 This Thurs is non-client lib 14:10:29 Note that that's the openstack schedule. Nova usually follows it to within a few days, but sometimes not exactly. 14:10:34 Jan 25 is the ff for clients, Jan 18 (yeah, Thurs, not Fri) is the ff for everything else 14:10:43 whoops, sorry 14:10:47 that *is* the nova schedule. 14:12:01 oh, one more thing IT... we have esberglu's patch for the feature docs adding powervm and mine to add taskflow as a requirement 14:12:25 I just bumped the latter to keep up with g-r, so lost your +1s there 14:13:00 link pls 14:13:05 save me finding it. 14:13:13 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533779/ 14:13:30 I think that's all IT? 14:13:45 oh, the g-r taskflow bump merged? 14:13:52 #topic Out-of-tree Driver 14:13:54 efried yep 14:13:57 niiice 14:14:37 I've been working through some random backlog items 14:14:53 I strenuously object on moral grounds to the two-spaces-to-one thing. 14:15:27 efried: Doesn't matter to me, I just wanted to see if I could get the bash right 14:15:41 I was gonna say we probably didn't NEED to do that... I like consistency, but it's not effort we need to spend 14:15:56 bash? 14:16:07 I assume he wrote a bash script to make the changes 14:16:13 yeah 14:16:18 oh, gotcha. 14:16:21 and for what it's worth, that seems to have worked 14:16:57 so efried if you object to merging that, just -1 or -2 and we can abandon it. I won't push it. I was just going to say merge it if you didn't object, since the work is done and consistency 14:17:22 I was being (somewhat) facetious. 14:17:45 I do object to people getting uppity about one space, because they know not why they protest. 14:18:01 lol... I hope I'm not getting uppity about it :) 14:18:11 And the reason doesn't apply to fixed-width. 14:18:24 +1 14:18:40 I'll review the patch later. 14:19:02 yeah, not a priority 14:19:13 Though tbh, I'm not sure it's worth muddying the git blame for five hundred lines. 14:19:25 But I'm not going to approve it without at least glancing at it. 14:19:56 Okay, we've already spent too much time on it; let's move on. 14:20:31 I just saw there's a patch up for refactoring volume drivers 14:20:34 I haven't looked yet 14:20:35 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530816/ 14:20:50 will try to look at that today 14:21:05 on my list too. 14:21:51 efried I wanted to ask what your plans are for 6121 14:22:05 I gave some comments there a while back 14:22:17 Yeah. It hasn't been a priority. 14:22:21 probably just sitting until we get past FF I assume 14:22:36 Doing what you request will be nontrivial and risky. 14:22:52 So if I'm going to do it, I know I'm going to need a decent time box. 14:23:03 do you not think it needs doing? 14:23:30 If I didn't think there was merit to the idea, I would have just started arguing right away :) 14:23:38 :) 14:23:45 I'm still not sure it's *worth* doing, but empirically you're right. 14:23:50 Merged openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/533860 14:24:14 bwarrum threw up a change for marking the encryption stuff expiremental, and I +1'd after one change 14:24:24 I didn't +2 because I wanted to make sure you like it 14:24:39 Yes, I definitely need to look at that. 14:25:06 My plan was actually to do a diff against HEAD~2 - i.e. look at the encryption stuff as if it had been put in that way. 14:25:10 to make sure nothing was missed. 14:25:18 ++ 14:25:29 but again, need a time box for that. 14:25:48 I think I'll probably get it this morning, because I'm *way* ahead of Jay in terms of code-for-reviews. 14:26:22 cool 14:26:37 I think that's all I had for OOT 14:27:57 #topic Device Passthrough 14:28:20 Same status as last week I'm assuming 14:28:22 samo samo 14:28:23 yup 14:28:32 Though things are looking slippy 14:28:36 because Jay's been out. 14:29:23 efried I saw him online yesterday I think? Is he back 100%? 14:29:35 He said 75%. But yeah, he's back. 14:29:47 flu sounds nasty this year 14:30:24 yeah, and I didn't get a flu shot. I'm afeared. 14:30:40 * edmondsw crosses fingers 14:31:03 I did have a thought on this 14:31:19 triggered by the feature doc update that esberglu put up yesterday 14:31:29 Merged openstack/networking-powervm master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/533906 14:31:43 there is another section to that doc for HPC, and it includes a GPU attach section 14:32:21 we should be working toward being able to include PowerVM as "complete" there 14:32:49 so let's be thinking about that for Rocky 14:33:22 all I had 14:33:46 #topic PowerVM CI 14:34:16 Starting to look into some stuff that I've been sitting on here 14:34:25 Merged openstack/nova-powervm master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/533912 14:34:35 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_ci_todos 14:34:53 That's pretty up to date, I can go into more detail here if you want 14:35:06 A lot of small cleanup 14:35:35 Then the next big change will be the pike undercloud upgrade started in change 6200 14:35:39 esberglu will we be able to test OVS and SEA both in the same CI run? 14:36:40 edmondsw: We should be able to get 2 pipelines going and run both on each patch 14:36:47 But OVS uses WAY more resources 14:37:27 k 14:37:57 I stole my staging CI systems to test OVS and vSCSI. Once I get those back I can start messing with it 14:37:57 I'll look over the TODO list in more detail post-meeting 14:39:14 #topic Open Discussion 14:39:16 Anything else? 14:40:29 Nothing from me 14:40:32 probably not for today 14:41:10 #endmeeting