14:00:18 <esberglu> #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting
14:00:30 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Nov 14 14:00:18 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:31 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:33 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting'
14:00:51 <mdrabe> o/
14:01:00 <efried> \o
14:01:36 <esberglu> #topic In-Tree Driver
14:02:08 <esberglu> Config Drive is still waiting for more core reviews
14:02:36 <esberglu> Gonna rework OVS today and respond to efried's comments
14:04:01 <esberglu> CI has been patching in the Config Drive patch for all IT runs for about a week now, everything has been looking good
14:05:21 <esberglu> I ran the pypowervm changes prompted by the OVS stuff (sys_uuid) through CI last night, that all looked good and is now merged
14:05:30 <esberglu> That
14:05:37 <esberglu> That's it for me
14:06:44 <efried> nothing in-tree from me.
14:06:58 <esberglu> #topic Out-of-Tree Driver
14:08:02 <esberglu> Anyone have items here?
14:10:06 <esberglu> #topic Device Passthrough
14:10:20 <esberglu> efried: Your turn
14:14:53 <esberglu> Moving on since efried dropped
14:15:04 <esberglu> #topic PowerVM CI
14:15:31 <esberglu> CI has been looking good. Last week we split out the undercloud neo systems to each have their own SSP
14:15:55 <esberglu> With the idea being that a whole group of systems wouldn't die when something went wrong
14:16:16 <esberglu> Run times have gone way down since doing that
14:16:21 <esberglu> Like almost in half
14:16:33 <esberglu> edmondsw: You know why that would be?
14:17:35 <edmondsw> esberglu not off hand
14:18:38 <edmondsw> send a note to thorst?
14:18:46 <esberglu> edmondsw: Will do
14:19:43 <edmondsw> esberglu and the ansible change from 5 to 15 should speed things even further?
14:19:57 <esberglu> edmondsw: That's just when deploying the environment
14:20:01 <edmondsw> ah, right
14:20:23 <esberglu> IT runs are down to about 40 min, OOT 50 min
14:21:25 <esberglu> Only consistent tempest failures I've been seeing are the multiple networks found on IT runs
14:21:43 <esberglu> Gonna spend an afternoon on that this week
14:21:53 <esberglu> That's all I had
14:21:57 <edmondsw> sounds good
14:22:03 <esberglu> #topic Open Discussion
14:23:32 <esberglu> Nothing from me
14:24:36 <edmondsw> sounds like we're gonna need a pypowervm 1.1.10 soon
14:25:31 <edmondsw> I need to talk to efried about next steps on 6121
14:26:43 <edmondsw> esberglu do you want to talk about 6021?
14:27:57 <esberglu> edmondsw: I know what to do with it, just have been putting it off for other stuff
14:28:03 <edmondsw> k
14:28:31 <esberglu> edmondsw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pypowervm/+bug/1637668
14:28:31 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1637668 in pypowervm "Get rid of need for host uuid" [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Eric Berglund (esberglu)
14:28:40 <esberglu> Are we trying to get that in for 1.1.10?
14:29:33 <edmondsw> esberglu I would say that's low priority, not necessary for 1.1.10
14:29:42 <esberglu> edmondsw: k
14:29:54 <efried> Hum, looks like I got disconnected and probably missed a bunch.
14:30:05 <edmondsw> efried some :)
14:30:15 <edmondsw> do you want to update us on PCI?
14:30:18 <esberglu> efried: We skipped over device passthrough if you have anything to say about it
14:30:34 <efried> My comment was, "Samo samo".
14:30:49 <efried> I thought it was just a really lazy meeting.
14:31:06 <edmondsw> efried I think you were hoping to make good progress while folks were at the summit... did that happen?
14:31:50 <efried> Yes, in the sense that I got a lot of functional tests written that will increase my confidence in the correctness of the code that's going in.
14:32:02 <efried> Also merged several patches on granular requests.
14:32:30 <efried> Jay was still getting hit with new-hire stuff, so wasn't as fully available as he could have been.
14:32:41 <edmondsw> k
14:32:54 <efried> But yes, I think progress was made to the extent that could have been expected considering lack of cores being around to push stuff through.
14:33:34 <edmondsw> efried we need to talk about next steps on 6121 but that's probably a slack discussion
14:33:50 <efried> yeah
14:33:51 <edmondsw> anything else we need before cutting 1.1.10?
14:34:07 <efried> Well, it would be nice to get 6121 sorted out, yeah.
14:34:28 <edmondsw> or anyone of the opinion that we should hold off cutting 1.1.10 even after that is sorted to see what else comes up?
14:34:37 <edmondsw> I think I'm inclined to go ahead and cut it sooner rather than later
14:34:52 <efried> whyzat?
14:35:09 <efried> The OVS bug?
14:35:12 <edmondsw> go ahead and start getting it pulled into requirements and get more folks using it
14:35:25 <efried> but why?
14:35:36 <edmondsw> the OVS bug
14:35:58 <efried> okay, so get it pulled in and get svenkat's fix switched over to using it.
14:36:59 <edmondsw> that's probably all for this meeting
14:38:56 <esberglu> #endmeeting