15:30:01 #startmeeting Performance Team 15:30:02 Meeting started Tue Jan 24 15:30:01 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:05 The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' 15:30:27 ad_rien_ spn sai akrzos o/ 15:30:35 o/ 15:30:35 tovin07 o/ 15:30:36 \o/ hello all 15:30:38 Hello DinaBelova ! 15:30:39 o/ 15:30:45 Good morning 15:30:58 hello folks :) good evening / morning :) 15:30:59 Hi all, (DinaBelova: msimonin is offline today) 15:31:07 ad_rien_ ack! 15:31:09 a very quick announcement before we get started 15:31:12 o/ 15:31:24 todays sadly I have only 30 minutes (unexpected meeting >_<) 15:31:32 so let's try to fit to this margin :( 15:31:36 sorry for inconvinience 15:31:38 sounds good 15:31:47 thats okay DinaBelova 15:31:49 we may start with action items :) 15:31:55 #topic Action Items 15:32:17 sai thanks for proposing a change with ml2/odl plugin testing :) 15:32:35 np, that work is going to start mostly mid february 15:32:42 i still need to update the test plan 15:32:58 sai ok, thanks, I'll take a look on it anyway this week :) 15:33:17 #action DinaBelova review sai 's ml2/odl plugin test plan 15:33:22 akrzos it looks like I need to keep your action item for a while? 15:33:34 regarding adding information regarding current telemetry researches progress to performance docs 15:34:00 oh, sorry 15:34:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421461/ 15:34:12 I see the change :) 15:34:16 akrzos thank you sir :) 15:34:54 yup 15:34:57 the only action item left was on me and ad_rien_ - regarding if we can have some common presentation this summit 15:35:01 results are pending review 15:35:06 akrzos ack 15:35:15 #action DinaBelova review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421461/ 15:35:58 ad_rien_ - sadly I was really sick last week :( had to take a sick leave for almost the whole week - so I did not manage to spend my time on this 15:36:13 ad_rien_ any ideas from your side? 15:36:36 DinaBelova: I think you are talking to akrzos ? 15:36:59 ad_rien_ nope :) already with you :) regarding action item that was on us 15:37:06 "think about what common presentation might be shown on summit" 15:37:12 ok sorry 15:37:16 my bad 15:37:20 it's ok :D 15:37:43 From our side 15:38:02 we would like to propose a performance study about OpenStack in a WAN context 15:38:24 #info Inria would like to propose a performance study about OpenStack in a WAN context (next summit) 15:38:27 The idea is to evaluate the impact of network latency (and possible network disconnections) between the controller services and compute nodes 15:38:57 ad_rien_ really good topic to be proposed + will be interesting for operators 15:38:58 We are currently discussing with Orange Labs and folks from the Chameleon testbed (University of Chicago) 15:39:30 We should have more information by the end of the week (as right now we are mainly exchanging emails to clarify what we would like to propose). 15:39:41 ad_rien_ ack, thank you sir 15:39:46 ohh nice ad_rien_ are you using tc to sim a WAN? 15:39:46 The experiment will leverage latest ENOS capabilities 15:39:51 rook: yes 15:40:03 ad_rien_: any automation work for this? 15:40:16 ie, standing up tc to sim X connection 15:40:26 #link https://github.com/BeyondTheClouds/enos 15:40:28 Sat/4g/edge/etc 15:40:54 rook: that is the objective of ENOS (further information from the aforementioned link) 15:41:04 thanks ad_rien_ 15:41:06 there is a technical report available at 15:41:16 #link https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01415522 15:41:46 DinaBelova: do you think we can submit the presentation 15:41:54 with a kind of ''performance WG'' approved ? 15:42:03 ad_rien_ I believe that yes! 15:42:07 s/approved/label 15:42:08 it's really interesting topic 15:42:32 how can we do that? It would be nice to flag this presentation according to some WGs? 15:42:57 and I truly believe it'll have its audience 15:42:58 ad_rien_ I did not check the tagging opportunities that were given this summit 15:43:09 ad_rien_ at least I believe you may mention it in the description 15:43:15 ok 15:43:28 Does anyone from the Performance WG want to take part to this action? 15:43:32 I need to send the Neutron API Performance results for the testplan I created 15:43:37 * rook adds that to his to-do 15:43:44 I don't know by investigating a particular aspect? 15:43:51 ad_rien_ also one thing to mention - let's use the right name Performance Team (technically we're part of LDT WG) 15:43:53 (can be discussed next week) 15:44:08 DinaBelova: ack 15:44:35 ad_rien_ let's discuss it next time - when you'll have clarity on the proposed topic :) 15:44:48 sure 15:45:01 you can give me an action 15:45:14 #info let's go through Inria's proposed summit talk next time, let's help folks to get the best presentation :) 15:45:31 #action ad_rien_ prepare info about OpenStack in a WAN context presentation 15:45:52 ok, it looks like we need to proceed (15 minutes left, sorry) 15:45:58 #topic Current progress on the planned tests 15:46:15 I believe that we have almost covered this topic :D 15:46:28 anyway, ad_rien_ - any specific experiments news? 15:46:37 no yet 15:46:43 still preparing the experiments. 15:46:47 We can move forward DinaBelova 15:46:57 #action rook add Neutron API Performance results for the testplan he created 15:47:03 rook just added the action item on you sir 15:47:38 ok, from Telemetry / odl plugin testing we also have patches on review (thanks sai and akrzos ) 15:48:10 from Mirantis side - we are currently discussing with Intel folks what part of our workloads tests can we share with community 15:48:43 can you elaborate a bit more DinaBelova ? 15:48:57 after two months of pure sharing I got some signs we'll need to hide some info due to legal discussions 15:48:58 ad_rien_ sure 15:49:47 in fact we have started workloads testing activity in December - what we wnated to have, is to test containerized OpenStack control plane and check it health during some real applications workloads running against the cloud 15:50:00 we used a methodology, proposed by Intel folks 15:50:08 in terms of our co-dev activity 15:50:34 and last week I got a request to put some info that used to be public to private access 15:50:57 in fact the meeting I have in 10 minutes is about it :) 15:50:58 with Intel folks 15:51:02 I want to clarify asap what we can share, what not and actually why 15:51:06 ok 15:51:26 Is it related to the Spec Cloud benchmark or it is something new/different? 15:51:31 yeah, a bit unexpected thing, but still 15:51:34 ad_rien_ different 15:51:35 (we can move forward if you prefer to discuss about it next week? ) 15:51:47 ad_rien_ I'll share info next time for sure 15:51:51 sure 15:51:53 go ahead 15:51:54 thanks 15:52:11 #action DinaBelova share status of workloads testing methodology/results sharing 15:52:18 #topic Open Discussion 15:52:24 tovin07 o/ 15:52:28 I have good news, OSprofiler in Nova is OK now. Thank rpodolyaka, DinaBelova. 15:52:29 OSprofiler in Magnum got +2 from PTL 15:52:30 One patch for DinaBelova to review before it get W+1 (stevemar said that) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/294535/ 15:52:43 tovin07: \o/ 15:52:44 thank you tovin07_ as well! ;) 15:52:57 tovin07_ oh yeah 15:52:58 keystone db tracing 15:53:05 I hope that today (IRC meeting in magnum), we will get W+1 15:53:13 I want to add a gate job which would trigger profiling of typical scenarios 15:53:18 tovin07_ I really believe this change should be ok, but lemme check it on the env 15:53:27 #action DinaBelova review before it get W+1 (stevemar said that) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/294535/ 15:53:30 DinaBelova: yes 15:53:30 rpodolyaka wow :) 15:53:35 it will be really cool 15:53:45 rpodolyaka: +1 15:53:53 And 15:53:57 DinaBelova, OSprofiler in Murano current status? 15:54:08 I plan to do it 15:54:13 ran into a few bumps with osprofiler and panko devstack plugins so far, want to fix that first 15:54:17 tovin07_ yes, please proceed with it 15:54:26 there is no active work on that from Mirnatis side 15:54:32 okay, I will do that :D 15:54:48 DinaBelova: I would like to know whether there will be a Google Summer of Code Campaign for OpenStack this year ? 15:54:58 rpodolyaka ok, that's cool 15:55:07 DinaBelova: np! thanks for the review! ;) 15:55:10 ad_rien_ frankly speaking I have no idea :) 15:55:19 rpodolyaka you are welcome! 15:55:30 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GSoC2016 you are mentioned as a mentors for the last campaign 15:56:04 we are thinking about proposing something from the Inria side around OpenStack but it would be probably more relevant to come through the OpenStack perspective. 15:56:14 ad_rien_ I was a mentor for outreachy program, that had an intersection with GSoC 15:56:38 so mostly I was active in outreachy program for women 15:56:59 and all mentors for outreachy were copied as well there :) 15:57:03 ok 15:57:04 :) 15:57:23 as that was only matter of mentee financing 15:57:35 not of the topic the mentee will work on 15:57:54 ad_rien_ and can you share what exactly are you planning to propose? 15:57:54 so If you hear about something, We would be pleased to propose something through the performance team 15:58:10 Coupling OSProfiler and performance analysis 15:58:23 ad_rien_ ack, got it. Are you interested only in GSoC? or other mentoring programs as well? 15:58:37 like the outreachy, that I mentioned? 15:58:49 can be. do you have some links? 15:58:57 on secong 15:59:08 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Outreachy 15:59:13 ad_rien_ ^^ 15:59:15 We are a research institution and we are used to propose internships so 15:59:18 ok thanks 15:59:25 gonna give a look to 15:59:28 ok :) 15:59:37 it looks like I need to jump to the next meeting 15:59:43 thank you folks for understanding 15:59:46 The interest if GSoC is that people receive a salary support 15:59:49 and for the quick meeting 15:59:51 which is rather attracting 15:59:53 ad_rien_ outreachy too 15:59:56 thanks! 15:59:58 ok gonna look 16:00:01 thanks for the meeting 16:00:04 thanks! 16:00:05 #endmeeting