14:00:25 #startmeeting oslo 14:00:26 Meeting started Mon Jun 12 14:00:25 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gcb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:29 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 14:00:31 courtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, crushil, dansmith, dhellmann 14:00:31 courtesy ping for dims, dougwig, e0ne, electrocucaracha, flaper87, garyk, gcb 14:00:31 courtesy ping for GheRivero, haypo, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti 14:00:31 courtesy ping for kragniz, lhx_, lifeless, lxsli, Nakato, ozamiatin, rbradfor 14:00:31 courtesy ping for redrobot, rpodolyaka, sergmelikyan, sileht, spamaps, sreshetnyak, sreshetnyak 14:00:32 courtesy ping for stevemar, therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek 14:00:49 o/ 14:00:49 o/ 14:01:01 o/ 14:01:07 o/ 14:01:31 \o/ 14:01:54 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 14:02:56 https://review.openstack.org/469806 oslo.messaging patch was merged , that's the only issue I know 14:04:35 and we revert https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470283/ for stable/ocata branch, so it works for stable/ocata 14:04:55 #topic Releases 14:05:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/473353 this is for master branch 14:06:18 I set workflow -1 before our weekly meeting, please raise if you have any concern 14:07:23 I also plan to prepare stable branches release recently 14:08:38 will post the patches links for stable branch in #openstack-oslo 14:08:50 #topic Stuck Reviews 14:10:17 I have one https://review.openstack.org/384559, please help review when you have time:-) 14:11:54 dhellmann: a simple fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470874 14:12:18 gcb : ok, I'll add that to my review queue 14:12:22 both 14:12:29 dhellmann, thanks 14:12:59 I could use some reviews on this documentation spec, since it's going to affect several of our repos: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/ 14:13:13 some of the documentation will move into oslo.config and oslo.log, for example 14:13:22 and then we'll be rearranging the way the doc builds work 14:13:33 I plan to set up oslo.config as an example soon 14:15:04 dhellmann, the changes makes sense, I will make change for other libraries, following your change 14:15:28 ok, great 14:15:39 dhellmann, any update about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454897/? 14:15:53 I saw just set workflow -1 14:18:03 gcb : I think we're not going to need to do all of that work 14:18:38 the configmap approach looks like it would be less work for everyone, and it would align with the pattern used for configuring other applications 14:19:33 yeah, I just went through http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/117943.html, will check the details later 14:20:00 the spec may still be useful for a way to store secret values, but we should consider if there is an easier way to do that 14:20:20 and someone brought up parsing yaml instead of ini files, and I'm sure we can do that without all of the refactoring implied by that spec 14:22:37 yaml works for machine and human :-) 14:23:17 #topic Open discussion 14:23:25 yes. my main objection to adding yaml support in the past was having to maintain and document 2 formats 14:26:06 yaml is superset of json, so that means it also works for json, right? 14:26:36 yes, I think that is true 14:26:51 I believe that's what we did when we added yaml support to the policy library 14:29:06 yeah, that's true 14:31:09 we're loosing contributors from oslo side, Roman Podoliaka just stepped down for oslo.db cores, we need do something to attract more people to oslo 14:34:49 Any ideas are appreciated 14:36:03 I think we can end the meeting today , thanks for everyone showing up 14:38:23 #endmeeting