16:00:06 #startmeeting oslo 16:00:06 Meeting started Mon Sep 12 16:00:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is harlowja_at_home. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 16:00:21 courtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dims 16:00:22 courtesy ping for dougwig, e0ne, flaper87, garyk, gcb, GheRivero, haypo 16:00:22 courtesy ping for ihrachys, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz 16:00:22 courtesy ping for lifeless, lintan, lxsli, Nakato, ozamiatin, rbradfor, redrobot 16:00:22 courtesy ping for rpodolyaka, sergmelikyan, sileht, spamaps, sreshetnyak, sreshetnyak, stevemar 16:00:23 courtesy ping for therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek 16:00:28 o/ 16:00:30 o/ 16:00:35 o/ 16:00:46 \o/ 16:00:50 o/ 16:00:50 \o 16:01:02 o/ 16:01:05 hi 16:01:10 yo yo 16:01:49 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 16:02:00 haven't heard of any keystone issues 16:02:02 any issues for folks to report, looks like oslo.db release seems to be fine now :) 16:02:11 Nothing to report here 16:02:46 cool 16:02:49 nothing from neutron I believe 16:02:51 #link https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html for folks also 16:02:59 RC1 I guess this week 16:03:27 ihrachys, great, good good 16:03:33 less issues the better ;) 16:03:58 especially considering the mess I triggered the last time :P 16:04:01 lol 16:04:18 it all got worked through, no worries ;) 16:05:31 #topic Ongoing work and specs and reviews 16:05:49 so I think folks are mostly working on docs, examples and such right now :) 16:06:15 if people also want to look @ https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo-specs that'd be great to 16:06:46 if some of those are dead/outdated/need updating, getting around to adjusting those; sooner (rather than later) would be super 16:06:58 lxsli, some of the ones u have might need adjusting? 16:07:09 (as well as some of my own, ha) 16:08:00 any other reviews that people want to highlight so that we can get some eyes on them? 16:08:41 some doc updates https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368513/ for the messaging peeps 16:08:57 thx kgiusti (i read that over a little while ago, looks good) 16:09:10 harlowja_at_home: yeah I'll take a look 16:09:26 made some "intelligent" guesses - oversight is needed. 16:09:34 kgiusti, def makes me think we need some kind of 'capabilities table' or something for each driver 16:10:16 def - where we know the "known unknowns" - stuff that's not implemented 16:10:25 ya 16:10:38 other one i'd also really like soonish is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229194/ 16:11:03 keep on finding various hacky exception transfer (serialize/unserialize) functions in various places 16:11:05 lol 16:11:47 nova cells has 1 variant, oslo.messaging has a similar variant, (i forget wherelse, ha) 16:12:31 https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/cells/messaging.py#L1869 (not kidding, ha) 16:13:20 maybe i'll throw something together for that this week 16:13:53 #topic Ocata summit planning 16:14:10 just a reminder for folks to add on to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-oslo-summit-planning with ideas and such :) 16:14:21 (comes out of #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/102553.html ) 16:15:08 if folks want to discuss specs, new things, new ideas, ... please put them in that etherpad so we can schedule them :) 16:16:44 #topic Open discussion 16:16:53 guess it's a short meeting :-P 16:17:22 anything else people want to bring up (i'm guessing most everyone busy trying to get RC1 newton and ... going) 16:17:48 PTL nominations also! 16:18:12 if people want to run (i probably will do it again also) then don't forget to jump in :) 16:18:16 the more the merrier 16:18:35 o/ Sorry I am late. 16:18:40 o/ 16:18:44 jungleboyj, how goes it? 16:18:53 Nothing to report from Cinder that I am aware of. 16:18:56 thx :) 16:19:06 glad that the ship is sailing smoothly 16:19:11 (at least for oslo, ha) 16:19:51 http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/?groupKey=build_name&resolutionKey=hour&searchProject=-with-oslo also look ok 16:20:05 cue i need to talk to a person about (not sure its ever getting fixed...) 16:20:19 so we've released everything for newton 16:20:24 we've got stable branches 16:20:25 right 16:20:39 so we're good to be adding new features to master or still holding off? 16:21:00 i think features are fine, although i'd prefer spec time and docs and examples (but that's just me) 16:21:55 cause i think https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo-specs could use a refresh/cleanup/... 16:23:24 but sure, if people want to do super-features, that's ok, be nice to have a spec for those (if people are willing/able to) 16:24:24 ok, just wanted to make sure that we're ok to approve non-bugfixes. 16:24:53 ya, should be ok :) 16:25:11 the coast is clear (for now, ha) 16:25:34 #action harlowja_at_home see about basic periodic jobs for N-1 release 16:25:56 i notice that the periodic jobs we have don't really run on the last stable so i'd like to get those going 16:26:45 what's that testing? 16:26:49 master right now 16:26:59 dsvm + master 16:27:07 and then libs + each projects master 16:27:57 i'll see if i can get something for N-1, gotta chat with some folks as to why that's not done, or not useful or... (or maybe it already exists) 16:28:19 are there even enough changes in stable branches? 16:28:32 a few, not a ton 16:28:48 may not be worth it, or could be worth it to run it periodically (weekly, vs daily) 16:29:13 (a slower rate would be fine with me) 16:30:01 something like http://logs.openstack.org/periodic/periodic-tempest-dsvm-oslo-latest-full-master/ but N-1 stuff 16:30:07 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:stable/mitaka+project:%255Eopenstack/oslo.* 16:30:32 right, perhaps not worth it 16:32:03 to me, doesn't seem worth it. 16:32:30 k, i'll see about maybe 20 minutes of asking around then, at least i'll come out a little more knowledgeable :-P 16:33:43 alright anything else from folks? 16:34:48 alrighty then, thanks for coming folks :) 16:34:56 until next week! :) 16:35:03 #endmeeting