15:43:09 <mihalis68_> #startmeeting ops-meetup-team
15:43:11 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar  3 15:43:09 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mihalis68_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:43:12 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:43:14 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ops_meetup_team'
15:43:25 <emccormick> Heh
15:43:27 <mihalis68_> general discussion about the upcoming events w.r.t. coronavirus
15:43:42 <mihalis68_> #action mihalis68_ to again tweet out requests for input on SK event (with disclaimer)
15:44:03 <mihalis68_> #action emccormick to start an etherpad for vancouver, which is apparently still on according to smcginnis
15:44:59 <mihalis68_> #action shintaro to follow-up once again with Jaesuk to see if the offer to host is still valid, given the situation in SK
15:45:38 <emccormick> Another thing for feedback from this group
15:45:50 <emccormick> The dissolution of the UC
15:46:05 <emccormick> Or rather its reallocation
15:46:46 <emccormick> There is an ML thread about what to do with it. It's going to fall under the TC somehow
15:47:30 <emccormick> But one of the suggestions was to drop some of those responsibilities on the "Ops team"
15:47:33 <mihalis68_> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetups-team
15:47:43 <emccormick> I can only assume that meant us
15:48:00 <mihalis68_> I must admit I didn't finish reading that email thread
15:48:40 <emccormick> I read it and it was too much governance complexity for my brain at the time
15:49:00 <emccormick> But everyone do go check it out and comment
15:49:01 <shintaro> I wasn't aware of the last part that some of the tasks will come to us
15:50:50 <emccormick> It was a suggestion by .. Mohammad I think
15:50:53 <mihalis68_> I'm not sure how that will work. The team is down to a low number
15:51:20 <mihalis68_> does it mean operators? Or ops meetups team members?
15:51:49 <emccormick> Yeah I dunno. It was unclear to me
15:52:10 <VW_> No, it's broader Ops
15:52:24 <VW_> we were discussing it before I finished my last UC term
15:52:43 <VW_> the truth is that we have a pretty active Ops community - and this group has a lot to do with that.
15:52:52 <VW_> So do we need a separate UC?
15:53:00 <emccormick> I think we can pitch In without having to take on much more. We already do some of those things anyway.
15:53:17 <VW_> or, do we have some number of seats on the TC elected by Operators and have a single governing group
15:53:36 <mihalis68_> other than the meetups team, though, the operators are not signed up for duties in any sense. They all have day jobs
15:54:06 <mihalis68_> I mean, I've spoken about the low manpower of the meetups team and asked for help, nothing has been forthcoming
15:55:25 <emccormick> Maybe if it came with a nice label, some bigger ops might put a body forward
15:56:10 <emccormick> I have no answers and am still pondering it myself
15:56:15 <mihalis68_> I guess those that are interested should find the mailing list thread, read what's been discussed and add their voice
15:56:20 <mihalis68_> can't be resolved here and now
15:56:22 <mihalis68_> so
15:56:27 <emccormick> I just wanted to point it out to everyone
15:56:29 <mihalis68_> #topic any other business
15:56:32 <mihalis68_> yes it was a good point
15:57:43 <mihalis68_> think we're done then
15:57:51 <mihalis68_> #endmeeting