15:06:05 #startmeeting ops-meetup-team 15:06:05 Meeting started Tue Nov 12 15:06:05 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mihalis68_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:06:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:06:09 The meeting name has been set to 'ops_meetup_team' 15:06:19 o/ 15:06:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetups-team 15:06:24 o/ 15:06:29 o/ 15:06:34 hello everyone 15:06:49 this is the OpenStack Operators "ops meetups team" meeting 15:06:51 thanks for coming 15:07:00 ni hao 15:07:10 I'm being a bit more formal since I invited everyone to come 15:07:10 ni hao 15:07:16 ni hao 15:07:27 #topic actions 15:07:37 self report any past actions you may have had 15:07:51 I got the meetup #1 proposal pout 15:07:53 *out 15:08:04 +1! 15:08:26 We got meetup 2 template submitted for SK 15:08:27 I don't recall if any of us had actions for Shanghai, but that got done too 15:08:34 ooh! 15:08:51 Took care of that in Shanghai 15:09:03 thanks to emccormick for being stalwart and running the meetup on the thursday 15:09:18 I left early for reasons that arguably no longer applied, unfortunately 15:09:45 on the agenda I collected the links for the various ops related sessions I know of : the war stories, the meetup itself 15:09:59 if anyone found any other sessions operator relevant please share those links 15:10:17 I also shared a pad smcginnis put together of notes 15:10:29 #link smcginnis's notes https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-ops-guide 15:10:43 There were some good info sessions I wanted to make sure we captured. 15:10:58 If I can track down the video to those, I will add it to the etherpad. 15:11:12 And hopefully someday we can get that content incorporated into the ops guide. 15:11:17 well done sean. I added a cold to my jetlag and frankly struggled a little in shanghai 15:11:27 +1 15:11:49 I guess we're already on shanghai retrospective 15:11:52 Hope you're feeling better. 15:11:59 #topic shanghai retrospective 15:12:06 sorry, on a call along with this. lots of stuff is linked off the meetup etherpad 15:12:13 if you can find that and post it here 15:12:15 yes thanks, was in good shape by the time it came to leave 15:12:30 it's in the agenda, one sec 15:12:39 #link meetup etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/shanghai-ptg-ops-meetup 15:12:52 I'll have to review that for the learns 15:13:01 any other things to discuss from shanghai? 15:13:07 t-shirts came out way too small 15:14:02 I fwded feedback to jimmy about a session that was described in english on the app but presented in chinese, with no way for an attendee to know to expect that beforehand 15:14:44 I thought the room they gave us for ops meetup was very nicely set up 15:14:55 I wish it'd been more full of energetic people, but we had some good discussions 15:15:29 you did what you could with what you had in the time you were given 15:15:43 last call for shanghai thoughts 15:16:04 #topic meetup #1 2020 15:16:34 since I work for the prospective host for this, it would be good if others could make sure we observe the formalities 15:16:46 I'd like to respectfully ask that this proposal be accepted 15:17:02 +1 to London 15:17:09 make it so 15:17:17 Should we do a formal vote? Or just yea's and nay's here? 15:17:36 how many are we? 15:18:00 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/oRuGYkER/ 15:18:03 I saw spotz earlier. emccormick, you, and me. 15:18:11 here! 15:18:24 Is that enough of a "quorum"? 15:18:33 I think so, but just asking. 15:18:45 shintaro responded same day as the proposal went out: 15:18:49 I can proxy for Shintaro too 15:18:53 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/4WrQZflW/ 15:18:54 We discussed in Shanghai 15:19:06 There was general consensus and no objections in the room 15:19:17 I'm in favor of going forward with London. emccormick, VW, shintaro have all indicated yes. 15:19:25 spotz: I think you were in favor too? 15:19:42 Yes London! 15:19:46 Wish I could go:( 15:19:53 Me too 15:20:07 I think that's pretty unanimous. 15:20:11 spotz should put it together with a trip to Luxembourg so she can come ;) 15:20:25 And stop in Paris on the way between. ;) 15:20:38 I can transfer my credit to London:) 15:21:33 #chair smcginnis 15:21:34 Current chairs: mihalis68_ smcginnis 15:21:53 I feel drunk with power! :D 15:21:59 sean you can use hash accepted to memorialize if you think we're at that point 15:22:05 a chair can do that, I en-chaired you 15:22:06 I just feel drunk 15:22:12 Haha 15:22:44 use your power! 15:22:59 #agreed Agreement on London for 2020 Meetup #1 15:23:27 w00t! 15:23:33 thanks guys 15:23:55 #topic Vancouver 15:23:57 So now let's get the foundation peeps to immediately get that in the vents calendar 15:24:13 the next summit-like event will be in vancouver, or so I hear. smcginnis? 15:24:19 Correct. 15:24:29 can you share the changes you heard about for that? 15:24:31 Though it sounds like Summit-like and more PTG/design summit 15:24:45 and yes, I'll communicate this meetup decision to the foundation 15:24:47 The way it has been described is as a "collaboration focused event" 15:24:49 Forumy 15:24:51 unless someone else wishes to 15:25:11 go right ahead Chris 15:25:20 and tweet / email it too 15:25:26 There will be some presentation time, and maybe a smaller expo hall kind of thing. But the main focus will be Forum/PTG type things. 15:25:46 So smaller than a full blown summit, but more focused on design discussions and the like. 15:25:48 Feedback from Shanghai was that was a key missing component (the events page) and more specifically the newsletter it feeds into 15:25:56 And they did explicitly call out operators as a target audience for it. 15:26:05 I'm excited by this 15:26:18 I think it will be a relatively big event for this team 15:26:30 I hope so. 15:26:47 the combined summit/forum/ptg things are hard to comprehend from the operators perspective 15:27:27 I think Vancouver will be full of more regulars so I'd expect a more lively crowd 15:27:31 yeah! 15:27:58 I know I've heard a lot more of the usual people excited about Vancouver. More so than they were for China. 15:28:04 so I'd say lets table worrying too much about Vancover until after London 15:28:07 or during London 15:28:10 Apologies to China. ;) 15:28:25 Well Vancouver's awesome so... 15:28:33 and starting to feel like home at this point ;) 15:28:53 I think the thing we need to do now for Vancouver is make sure this team is pulled into any discussions about how the format of that event should be. 15:28:55 yes, I only wanted to get the news of the change into this meeting for the record, start to get people excited about it 15:28:59 not much to really do just yet 15:29:08 Otherwise, yeah, probably not much to do there until after London is out of the way. 15:29:17 oh, and it sounds like fall in Berlin is in the works. I'm not sure why there again :/ 15:29:52 frequent-summiter discount? 15:29:55 That's not official yet. 15:30:20 just dirty rumors ;) 15:30:30 "Somewhere in Germany" was mentioned in the board meeting, but they have not signed any contracts yet, last I heard. 15:30:52 Munich please 15:30:53 :D 15:30:57 That would be nice. 15:31:00 did you say you have a proposal for SK? 15:31:05 yes yes 15:31:06 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetup-2nd-korea-2020 15:31:07 for meetup #2 15:31:58 cool. I've put that on the agenda. I will fwd to the community on the mailing list and via twitter 15:31:59 Looking at the dates, I don't see any conflicts. At least with the events I'm tracking for next year so far. 15:32:16 I wonder if we should adopt a wechat group as yet another outlet for such news? 15:32:20 Should be early enough to avoid conflicting with whatever the Summit event ends up being. 15:32:22 there's a big openstack group 15:32:40 He seemed kinda excited about the Jeju possibility 15:32:50 if the mailing list fails to reach many operators even in english, I cannot imagine it's reaching them in china 15:32:54 I wonder if it will be possible to get more Chinese operator involvement. 15:32:58 not sure who's it is to decide which venue there 15:33:34 If that Summit group stays open, maybe that will be a good place to mention it on Wechat 15:34:20 We could mention now that they should watch for updates on the mailing list. That might get some attention at least. 15:34:23 I'll give it a try. OpenStack norms are to do all communication via open channels, but I think we need to consider efficacy too 15:34:39 It's at least semi-open. 15:34:59 twitter has been proven to work, right? 15:35:01 #link https://twitter.com/osopsmeetup 15:35:15 For other than China, I think so. 15:35:24 I'll drop the update about london and sk into that big openstack group on wechat and see if people respond 15:35:28 Well, adding new channels is fine so long as the open one isn't dropped 15:35:38 ++ 15:35:44 ML can be primary. The others are just for wider visibility 15:35:46 much agree, very correctness. WOW 15:36:02 we've touched on all topics I had, and so... 15:36:06 #topic any other business 15:36:31 hey neat. We got 5 new followers since the Shanghai meetup 15:36:42 I forgot to action myself up to launch the planning process for London 15:36:53 #action mihalis68_ to kick off London 2020 planning 15:37:12 #action mihalis68_ to communicated London 2020 agreement to all channels (and some new ones) 15:37:27 and foundation to get on calendar 15:37:42 yep 15:38:14 How are we doing with this time slot and meeting cadence? 15:38:29 I once again heard of other teams who swap time slots every other meeting 15:38:42 seems fine still, though we did lose Shintaro this week 15:38:46 however shintaro continues to claim this is fine, and he's our main or only APAC attendee 15:39:05 Most teams I've talked to that swap times have said it's caused confusion and people missing the meeting because they never remember which week it is. 15:39:39 I'd say we worry about that if we get interest from over that way 15:39:40 I could do earlier if that makes it a little friendlier for APAC, but it seems like this time is working well. 15:39:43 yeah, if we decided to do that, I would probably try to use a calendar system and actually force this onto peoples real calendars 15:40:19 nobody has pointed to the meeting time as a reason for not participating 15:40:19 yeah, I just bring it up regularly because it's almost embarrassing to have a time fixed at 10am EST 15:40:27 emccormick: I agree. If we ever hear "I would attend but it's way too late for me", then I think we should think about adjusting. Until we get any sign of that, I don't think it's work this. 15:40:29 ok, guess that's fine for now 15:40:48 Good to recheck every once in awhile. 15:41:02 feel like we got a lot done here. Any more? 15:41:24 What are next steps for London? 15:41:44 Start collecting topics in an etherpad? Publicizing the event date? 15:41:48 notify foundation, tweet and email the decision. Start the topic selection 15:41:51 all on me 15:42:04 Trying to think through what we can start doing right away so we can try to avoid the crunch right before the event. 15:42:31 to be honest, I will probably pick the sessions that worked well in NYC and use them to form a "probable topics" list immediately 15:42:38 mihalis68_: Please delegate what you can. I feel bad that you need to do it all. 15:42:44 That sounds like a good plan. 15:43:02 I'm inspired by this: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2007/10/26/evidence-based-scheduling/ 15:43:06 yeah planning etherpad would be good to start up 15:43:20 topics that work at meetups don't need to be suggested again 15:43:28 if there's evidence that a topic works, it's in 15:43:30 that's my new plan 15:43:47 ++ 15:44:00 I don't need to delegate. I took it easy for the shanghai event, on a relative basis 15:44:05 my boss and his boss support me doing this 15:44:19 but thanks :) 15:44:26 OK, good. I just don't want you to get overloaded with anything. ;) 15:44:34 nah, i'm good 15:44:56 I want to make London better than NYC 15:45:00 the venue is better 15:45:07 hehehe, it's London:) 15:45:08 the one irritant is the max capacity is 48 15:45:43 Any additional overflow rooms a possibility if it ends up being a popular event location? 15:45:44 well I left London for NYC, but ok :) 15:45:57 seems very hard to get 15:46:21 if we get 48, that will be the biggest for several, so it's ok 15:46:28 true 15:46:46 I'll stand in the corner if it means one more new person gets in 15:46:49 Yeah, it will be a good problem to have if we need to scramble to find more space. 15:46:54 or update etherpads from the pub next door 15:47:01 ;) 15:47:07 oh yeah, I also have to kick the people who will provide the registration web site 15:47:10 since we have to make that 15:47:13 (it's London so I'm sure there's a pub next door) 15:47:33 yeah sooner the better on that one 15:47:41 #action mihalis68_ to initiate getting the registration site for London 2020 up and running 15:48:18 think we're done 15:48:19 it's the 8th / 9th right? 15:48:20 last call 15:48:27 Good progress! 15:48:32 Wed / Thursday 15:48:59 7/8 15:49:00 Etherpad says 7th/8th. 15:49:08 So Tuesday-Wednesday. 15:49:21 I just went back to the actual aproval ticket to make absolutely certain 15:49:44 kk 15:49:55 ok that's it for me then. 15:50:04 put a bow on it 15:50:09 thanks all 15:50:15 Thanks! 15:50:24 #endmeeting