15:03:21 #startmeeting Ops Meetup Team 15:03:22 Meeting started Tue Jan 31 15:03:21 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mihalis68. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:23 ty sir 15:03:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:03:27 The meeting name has been set to 'ops_meetup_team' 15:03:35 #topic review of last weeks actions 15:03:39 o/ 15:03:50 hi 15:03:56 No progress on mine. Sorry, we are dealing with a medical issue in my family 15:04:08 hi All 15:04:13 (that was the wiki page to tie together all of our meet up initiatives, I will get to it) 15:04:22 o/ 15:05:47 i sent message to volunteer mods 15:05:52 mrhillsman I saw your email asking for moderators to come forward - very nice. Well done 15:05:55 hope yall got it 15:06:10 as well as the other regarding tickets 15:06:17 Did that have the eventbrite link? 15:06:33 Ah ok 15:07:01 I see zioproto had an action to email scientific WG to get them to consider coming to Milan 15:07:30 is zioproto here? 15:07:41 other actions all seemed to have landed on fifieldt 15:07:45 is tom here? 15:08:20 ok. Seems like both not here. I'm going to guess no progress on those 15:08:28 #topic milan planning 15:08:32 how is this going? 15:09:37 I had added a possible topic at the end. I wasn't sure which type of session it would best be. Just wanted to point it out in case it was overlooked since it's farther down. 15:09:49 Looks like OpsTools-Ansible added a topic after it as well. 15:10:26 So take a look between Lightning Talks and Moderators sections and vote if you are interested. :) 15:10:56 The Cinder one? 15:11:08 I am pulling together the agenda for todays meeting here (I see someone started already, thanks) : https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetups-team 15:11:22 emccormick: Yep, that's the one. 15:11:25 I think a general Cinder session beginning with the discussion you proposed would be good. 15:11:29 please add your name to the attendees list 15:11:37 Put it up top so people can +1 it 15:11:48 we also need a spot for user committee 15:11:53 any objections to that? 15:12:01 emccormick: Any thoughts if it would be good as a Lightning Talk or General Session? 15:12:37 for those who don't have it, we are discussing the planning document for milan which is here : https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup 15:12:52 smcginnis: I would do as a general session. Lightning talk seems way too short for something like that. If we have extra time we can do other cinder talk 15:13:06 emccormick: Sounds good, I'll move it up. Thanks! 15:13:08 I've listed the session list on the spreadsheed with num of +1s 15:13:15 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EUSYMs3GfglnD8yfFaAXWhLe0F5y9hCUKqCYe0Vp1oA/edit#gid=2006054635 15:14:42 Did we put a deadline on session submissions? IF not, should we? 15:14:42 How is milan planning actually happening, is it just via the ether pad and the google doc? Or is there an ad-hoc email chain> 15:14:43 ? 15:15:00 +1 agree on deadline 15:15:05 I sent another message regarding submissions 15:15:23 lock it down by this time next week? 15:15:24 Say one more week? 15:15:26 Two weeks? 15:15:28 snap! 15:15:32 :) 15:15:36 great minds my friend 15:15:38 sounds reasonable 15:15:40 any other viewpoints? 15:16:04 I'd let it go to 2/19 I think 15:16:06 #agreed close submissions for Milan Feb 7th 15:16:17 oops 15:16:20 ok well never mind haha 15:16:32 well what do people think 15:16:32 i'm not against it taking longer 15:16:39 I don't care so much. I figured 3 weeks was enough for us to get space settled and moderators assigned 15:16:41 we can reshape the agenda accordingly 15:17:06 primary concern i think is confirming space, mods, logistics are in order 15:17:11 it doesn't have to be a hard deadline 15:17:15 agreed 15:17:24 two weeks then 15:17:25 could just be a target date to get peoples minds focused 15:17:33 +1 15:17:49 mihalis68 put to vote? 15:17:53 Say 2/13 in the email 15:17:56 or we have consensus 15:17:58 that way it's the day before we meet 15:18:09 I like 2/13 15:18:12 +1 15:18:17 any objection? 15:18:19 +1 15:18:22 +1 15:18:29 ok 15:18:37 #agreed target close date for submissions 2/13 15:18:46 #action mihalis68 to email list with this announcement 15:18:59 any other business for milan today? 15:19:10 I know it's the main focus however the next agenda item is a doozy 15:19:25 #topic move august outside of USA? 15:19:43 can the person who put this on the agenda please explain the suggestion (I can guess...) 15:19:48 oh dear 15:20:03 if I might I'll explain how we got to the current plan? 15:20:15 what is going on in the news mihalis68 15:20:24 around travel issues 15:20:29 expected location for 2017 first mid-cycle is "not north america" 15:20:30 This is to do with the Trump Executive Order 15:20:42 which made the expectation for the second one north america 15:20:47 and we have a hosting proposal 15:20:56 however... yes geopolitical events. I am well aware guys 15:21:07 I wanted the person who put this on the agenda to say it. I think that's fair, no? 15:21:41 that was me.... 15:22:00 suggestion to move, because Trump, is that right? 15:22:01 We shoudl address it directly. Too late to change course is a reasonable answer 15:22:12 agreed 15:22:16 just like foundation 15:22:27 Well because of difficulties community members might experience, but yeah Trump is short version 15:22:31 Copy / Paste the statement from their blog ;) 15:22:47 The following three OpenStack Summits, however, are now scheduled to occur outside of the United States. 15:22:54 if it needs to be said, totally horrified by this 15:22:56 post Sydney 15:22:57 I think the odds of this still being a thing by August is small 15:23:08 true 15:23:12 emccormick: I sure hope you are right. 15:23:15 the EO runs out in 90 days or 120 days depending on the person 15:23:16 just something to think about though 15:23:17 Yeah it impossible to predict August situation which is what makes it hard 15:23:22 I am in favor of keeping going with the intel proposal 15:23:29 yep 15:23:32 speaking personally, not as chair, no intent to lead discussion 15:23:35 so unless we have Refugee Operators who are trying to move here we should be OK 15:23:56 I think it was right to discuss this 15:24:14 Could we ask the Intel folks if they happen to have a backup site in Canada just in case? :D 15:24:19 hehe 15:24:22 Given difficulty of getting proposals I think thats reasonable (stay the course for now), fall back would be what Tokyo but probably too late for that and we had nothing else 15:24:33 agreed on all points 15:24:36 i can check on canada site 15:24:38 emccormick: taht would be magical :) 15:24:45 let's go somewhere sane like the UK. Oh no, wait... 15:25:14 I would go to canada for the august one, most likely 15:25:19 they may have a vancouver site 15:25:19 if it moved there 15:25:23 Cuba. Looking good right now 15:25:40 you just want the cigars, I GET IT 15:25:47 lol 15:25:48 +1 15:25:55 so we are good to move on? 15:25:56 and the rum 15:26:06 +1 move on 15:26:15 aye 15:26:21 ok 15:26:46 we finished the itinerary items which got written up, but the next obvious one is what work comes next for planning August 15:27:09 the location will be oregon, is that correct? 15:27:13 we are cool with locking down a wg/small room for uc at mid-cycle? 15:27:20 i need to report back yay or nay 15:27:34 +1 for UC 15:27:48 are you our defacto intel point of contact then mrhillsman? 15:27:59 i am 15:28:19 * mrhillsman raises benevolent hand cautiously 15:28:46 are you up for being the official benevolent dictator of the process of planning oregon? 15:28:59 indeed 15:29:09 works for me - everyone else? 15:29:16 +1 15:29:17 +1 15:29:28 +1 15:29:50 #agreed mrhillsman is benevolent dictator of the task of planning oregon (2017 2nd mid-cycle meet up) 15:29:54 +1 15:30:49 it seems to me that this event is pretty much locked in now, then. I don't recall if we made it official in the minutes that this and no other is the 2nd mid-cycle event - oregon, intel, mrhillsman 15:31:08 any objection to that statement? 15:31:12 none 15:31:13 nyet 15:31:19 no 15:31:31 Do we have a city? Or is that TBD by Intel? 15:31:50 there were two venue possibilities last I saw, both Oregon IIRC 15:31:50 I'm assuming Portland for ease but I thought there was a second place possible close by 15:32:03 I think we know it's in that state, so far 15:32:03 we are looking at downtown portland 15:32:07 or hillsboro 15:32:25 are they fairly close? 15:32:27 if anyone wants to be part of the email thread let me know 15:32:38 i think i sent it to everyone 15:32:39 for example same airport for international travelers (or east coasters)? 15:32:45 we are meeting again on 2/10 15:33:06 supposedly there is a lot going on in portland during that time 15:33:14 portland has more buzz in my mind 15:33:33 but if they are close does the difference matter at this distance? (i.e. > 6 months out) 15:33:38 OH I see. Hillsboro is at least Portland-adjacent 15:34:04 trying to consider transit as well 15:34:09 makes no difference then. Just say "Portland" and leave it at that 15:34:15 airport to downtown has a direct shot 15:34:18 ok. Think we are agreed 15:34:37 but will have details after the 10th for arguing about hehe 15:34:39 #agreed 2nd 2017 mid-cycle is decided to be intel-hosted, portland area, august 15:34:39 Poor bastards flying to DC and coming to Washington-Dulles are 30 miles out of the city. Same difference ;) 15:35:22 just kidding about the arguing btw 15:35:32 unless anyone wants to 15:35:47 anyways 15:35:51 next? 15:35:54 #info current geopolitical instability wrt travelers to usa was noted, but too late to redo entire location and host process 15:37:23 we reached end of itinerary. If Tom were available, I had been hoping we could talk tooling 15:37:25 anything else for the day? 15:37:36 we can send him an email mihalis68 15:37:43 as regulars know, i think we could do better than this mishmash of IRC, email, ether pad, google doc 15:37:47 fifieldt you around? 15:37:50 and tom had said "yes I have ideas" 15:37:54 but that is as far as it went 15:38:00 tom seems to be unavailable 15:38:04 ok 15:38:14 a good chairman closes a meeting early when done 15:38:16 you can action me to email him 15:38:18 I think we may be there 15:38:21 agreed 15:38:32 #action mrhillsman to email tom re: tooling of meet ups team 15:38:36 is that what you meant? 15:38:39 will cc you 15:38:41 yep 15:38:44 very good 15:38:44 +1 EOM 15:38:49 +1 15:38:56 ok I'll give it like one more minute 15:38:58 any more for any more? 15:39:01 +1 15:39:04 nada 15:39:10 #endmeeting