14:01:20 #startmeeting openstack-swg 14:01:21 Meeting started Thu Jan 19 14:01:20 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gothicmindfood. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:25 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_swg' 14:01:37 o/ 14:01:42 I am in the noisiest coffeshop ever 14:01:53 * gothicmindfood is thankful for IRC meetings 14:02:13 shall we cover our action items for last week? 14:02:17 err - two weeks ago? 14:02:35 #topic review/recap action items 14:02:40 * johnthetubaguy hates video conferencing with noise cancelling headphones, it doesn't work 14:02:54 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_swg/2016/openstack_swg.2016-11-08-15.04.html 14:03:00 for those who want a quick link to see those 14:03:31 oh no, that's a super old one 14:03:40 you might want this year 14:03:55 but history is fun too ;) 14:03:58 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_swg/2017/openstack_swg.2017-01-05-14.01.html 14:04:21 I guess I need an action to close all of my action/meeting summary tabs from 2016 :) 14:04:52 so the first two were mine 14:05:13 finalizing logistics has been interesting, so a couple notes there: 14:05:16 so I have failed to attend the TC due to a combination of illness, and rehearsals, and it being a 9pm meeting :( but sent out things on email 14:05:47 1) the Foundation has agreed to fund the April 10 training costs, so attendees will only need to cover their own travel (like last year) 14:06:02 can we book flights and hotel? 14:06:30 EmilienM: I'd wait just a second - I'm going to say mid-February for booking if that's okay? 14:06:39 it is 14:06:44 EmilienM: awesome :) 14:07:21 the next steps for leadership training are for me to confirm a list of attendees, finalize the specific dates the week of April 10th with those people, and then open up the remaining seats to the community 14:07:34 that will all likely happen in February. 14:07:48 so 2) is that the Foundation is interested in funding a day long visioning session 14:08:10 however, ttx and I have been discussing how crazy-over-scheduled folks will be at the PTG 14:08:25 and we are loathe to exclude people just because they're leading sessions they need to lead 14:08:54 my understanding is there's a potential for a TC & Board get together after the PTG 14:08:56 * fungi wonders if it should be tacked onto the two-day tc/board powwow 14:08:59 yeah, that 14:09:01 yeah 14:09:01 so the joint board/tc meeting that coming up, could we fund an extra day there? 14:09:04 yeah 14:09:04 I fear we'll have facilitation in a room with 4 people 14:09:35 +1 to tacking to something already existing 14:09:44 becase the next months are madness 14:09:46 +u 14:09:51 yes +1 too, too much travels otherwise 14:09:58 now I can't see me getting budge to attend that meeting, but thats a different battle 14:10:25 so we're looking into adding a day to that, but I haven't heard about dates confirmed so we're a little on hold there until we do 14:10:39 backup plan: videoconference? 14:10:52 johnthetubaguy: is it possible that getting funding gets easier if you say the TC is going to plan the vision of what OpenStack will be there? 14:11:02 but also EmilienM is right - videoconference would be great. 14:11:04 Last time I looked Boston the week of March 6th still led 14:11:18 also, it's important to keep in mind we'll likely come out with a draft that will be edited a LOT before Boston 14:11:39 -1 to using location names to describe events thanks to Boston overloading 14:11:47 gothicmindfood: unsure, sadly 14:11:58 ttx: hahaha. Yes. I will refrain from that in the future now 14:12:21 Event Codename: The Kraken 14:12:22 johnthetubaguy: okay. we'll do everything we can to be inclusive if you can't make it. 14:12:52 did we want to try something like two weeks after the PTG on videoconference? 14:12:56 gothicmindfood: if we pick VideoConference, I can offer Bluejeans (with my Red Hat account) - it scales very well, and features are awesome; just fyi. 14:13:39 You know - I'm going to go ask the ZingTrain folks about whether they've ever done it via videoconference. 14:13:40 or if we pick conference call, we already have pbx.openstack.org for sip and dial-in 14:13:51 I personally have never done an 8 hour videoconference 14:13:56 and it sounds kind of terrible 14:14:00 it probably is 14:14:16 but I will ask them to see how they've accomodated such things in the past to investigate that option 14:14:18 i have done 8+hour conference calls, and i can say that's plenty terrible 14:14:59 #action gothicmindfood to find out about remote options for vision facilitation 14:15:05 like I said, it's a backup plan, we need to consider not everyone wants/can travel (budget or family reasons) 14:15:29 fungi: honestly, where possible, faces makes a big difference 14:16:01 yeah, 8 hour conference calls suck, I would say at a minimum, two 4 hour stints would be better 14:16:05 * EmilienM would make the trip FWIW 14:16:16 also, no groups of folks joining together from a room 14:16:49 I'm not sure how structured the facilitation is around actually being in a room, though, so I just need to check on whether that's even a thing that's possible 14:16:55 proper telepresence facilities that bridge two remote conference rooms aren't that bad. i've had good experiences there but it's very expensive 14:17:12 one plus is that if I'm there, I can act on behalf of anyone who's remote as my only job, since I don't really have a ton of opinions on the content of the vision 14:17:34 fungi: yeah, that can work 14:17:37 fungi: Red Hat has bluejeans accounts for employees, we could use it, in case. 14:18:12 ok - it sounds like we're all in favor of this *not* being at the PTG and trying to find another time 14:18:25 we'll continue to look into remote options for either part of the group or all of it. 14:18:32 * fungi finds brady-bunch-style videoconferencing just as bad as voice-only, but maybe that's just me 14:18:42 my next action item was to look up some visions and get links for folks. I only could find two, but I'm still searching 14:18:46 Well I think that's athing we can have /out/ of the PTG week and at this stage I think everythingf that can happen elsewhere should 14:18:46 it sounds like next time we should organize a 2 weeks event :-) PTG + the rest 14:18:50 it was the all remote option that seemed interesting to me, the half and half never really works for me 14:19:26 part of the problem is that a lot of companies keep detailed visions as proprietary and don't want to publish them 14:19:35 so a lot of "vision statements" read more like "mission statements" 14:19:47 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AtlantaPTG-SWG-TCVision 14:19:48 fungi: some of our non-native-english contributors have told me they prefer video because body language and such helps get the right meaning of their words across 14:20:05 I put some of the vision links I did find at the bottom of that etherpad ^^ 14:20:24 I'll keep adding as I get more to share 14:20:24 jroll: that's true 14:20:29 yes, I would be useless through videconf 14:20:52 you need to se my hands to understand wth I'm trying to say 14:21:15 ttx: just hold them up high and be more dramatic! 14:21:16 :) 14:21:19 jroll: interesting point. i'd never heard that, but i can see it being the case 14:21:21 for 8 hours ? 14:21:32 ttx: you'll have to train for leading up to that long, I'm sure. 14:21:56 jazzercise to the rescue 14:21:57 remote and visioning seems really hard :) 14:21:58 jroll: honestly I find the same thing, even as a native speaker, but not as extreme I guess 14:22:22 ttx: I'm assuming bringing up vision facilitation at open discussion at the TC meeting happened? 14:22:28 * gothicmindfood hasn't trolled logs this week yet 14:23:00 as someone who maintains nearly all his personal relationships and conversations through text media, i'm mostly blind to intonation and facial expressions/body language 14:23:10 gothicmindfood: johnthetubaguy mentioned it in a thread instead 14:23:26 ah cool. 14:23:55 fungi: you use more subtle signals like absence or presence of final punctuation. 14:24:05 so true 14:24:11 this thread? 14:24:15 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2017-January/001316.html 14:24:36 "thread" might be an overstatement but yes 14:24:44 gothicmindfood: nice links, those are the ones we went over in training, yeah? 14:24:53 jroll: yup 14:24:54 and the dev message linked from it i guess... 14:24:58 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109575.html 14:25:14 thanks for those fungi :) 14:25:36 np 14:25:46 awesome. So that's our action items 14:27:34 I wanted to talk a bit about the Pike Summit in Boston and what our plans might be for there, esp. since the CFP is closing soon-ish 14:27:42 does anyone else have any topics they need to cover before that? 14:28:27 no 14:28:49 #topic Pike (Boston) Summit plans for SWG 14:29:23 okay - so, we should also write a vision for this, but first I wanted to get feedback on what we might want to get done there before I start drafting my (80 bajillionth) vision 14:30:11 which reminds me - since we're also no longer doing a vision draft at the PTG, we probably want to rethink our session at the PTG. but we can talk about that in a sec 14:30:30 does it still seem realistic that we could have a draft to the community of the TC Vision by the time May rolls around? 14:30:48 * jroll is unsure if he'll even be at the forum 14:30:48 if we wait to facilitate until March, that still gives us a couple of months 14:31:05 * johnthetubaguy has similar worries to jroll 14:31:13 jroll: yeah, I think one of the first things we should assume is that not a ton of people will be there 14:31:19 from the -dev world anyhow 14:32:05 but we will have produced this vision, and does the (theoretical) list of people who *will* be there matter in terms of presenting that vision? 14:32:33 probably? hopefully? 14:32:43 guess it depends who shows up :) 14:32:45 I'm definitely on the hopefully side :) 14:33:04 * alexismonville will probably be able to join this time as he lives in boston :p 14:33:15 and, well, do users/ops care about the TC vision, or just the overall openstack vision? 14:33:27 I think they'll care about it 14:34:04 depends whats in it, planing to create an openstack vision might be the main news that interests them, maybe? 14:34:27 I guess this deadline thing re: CFP could focus us in on things - do we think presenting something in the context of the panel makes sense, or is this better as a team presentation/slide talk? 14:35:34 I'm happy to write the most vague things in the submission because frankly I think we won't know exactly how best to present the content until we have it 14:35:42 I think a talk could be interesting - present the vision and what it might mean for the next 14:35:51 but I'm still unsure about whether panels or presentations are best here. 14:36:01 yeah, my employer isn't going to let me skip the summit/forum without a really good reason, so i expect to be there if help is needed 14:36:07 jroll: dyou think a talk would give enough room for lots of feedback from the audience? 14:36:23 or whether we need that? 14:36:31 start with a big grand "imagine you're at the T forum, in , and blah blah " 14:36:37 hahaha 14:36:43 yeah, there is a storytelling element to it 14:36:47 gothicmindfood: you could leave room for a long Q&A 14:36:55 write the presentation in vision tense 14:36:55 and specifically ask for feedback as well 14:36:57 heh 14:36:59 okay. So maybe a talk, but a half-time one so there's plenty of Q&A 14:37:00 questions/comments and answer 14:37:12 cool. 14:37:13 * jroll thinks we need morgan freeman's voice doing this talk 14:37:15 alright 14:37:16 hahaha 14:37:36 so, while I am also uncertain about funding to go to Boston, I'll go ahead and submit this 14:37:55 we could probably get patrick warburton. he's always eager for work ;) 14:37:56 if for some reason I can't go, it's totally okay to pass it off to whoever on the TC or SWG can I think 14:38:10 so I guess the half-time talk thing is kind of a cross between a talk and a panel, 20 minutes of each 14:38:14 which could be fun 14:39:00 #action gothicmindfood to write Pike Summit submission for a presentation on the TC's vision 14:39:08 * fungi loves panel format anyway 14:39:14 I love panels too 14:39:24 we can always turn it into one 14:39:35 indeed 14:40:34 anything else with an SWG-theme we could do at the pike summit, besides presenting the vision? 14:41:40 * gothicmindfood is so focused on PTG stuff it's hard to think about what Pike will be like 14:41:56 Better. 14:41:56 there was some discussion of mini-leadership-training tips/tricks for community leaders, though that maybe shoud wait until more of us are on the same page about that kind of stuff i guess 14:42:18 fungi: yeah, I'd love some more workshop-focused stuff that we could sponsor 14:42:55 pike forum seems soon, queens forum maybe 14:43:04 fungi: ++ 14:43:21 okay - so I think we're settled with the pike stuff we need at the moment 14:43:34 #topic PTG vision revisit 14:43:50 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AtlantaPTG-SWG 14:44:29 so we have this vision written and some of it can still apply, though we should probably get more specific 14:45:19 * gothicmindfood is going to update so that it's clear we're not going to do vision facilitation at the PTG now 14:46:01 so if we don't the vision facilitation, what do we want to do instead? 14:46:42 well, my initial plan before there was interest in doing the full vision there, was to have sessions introducing some of the concepts from leadership training 14:47:21 which include stuff about visioning, stuff about principles/culture, servant leadership, and potentially change management 14:48:12 that's just a list off the top of my head though - anyone have any other ideas? 14:49:03 the idea for smaller sessions per concept came from the interest that was at our cross project session at the ocata summit 14:49:14 a lot of people were really curious about what servant leadership was, for example 14:50:16 do we know if they will be there for that day at the PTG? 14:50:21 and in the SWG room 14:51:03 johnthetubaguy: it's unclear to me who will be at the SWG sessions, but if we take Monday, I imagine we're risking some of the folks who are arriving later not being able to attend 14:51:33 ttx: Monday is infra/release and which other cross-project days? 14:51:51 gothicmindfood: see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTG/Pike/Etherpads 14:52:50 oh wow. That's a lot of people. 14:53:02 it's always a lot of people 14:53:32 We could try to place our day on the Friday, but it's a bit late to try to change 14:53:35 ttx: truer words have never been spoken 14:54:02 I probably won't be able to attend the whole day in the SWG room tbh 14:54:06 well - I'm comfortable staying with Monday, but I think the question is what can we do that's useful that day for the portion of the community that might be able to attend 14:54:17 especially if I end up having to retake RelMgt PTLship 14:54:19 yeah, I'll likely be bouncing around as well 14:54:38 that's why I was thinking of breaking up the time into smaller themes 14:54:43 we could say "only in the morning" and try to get more people at the same time 14:55:15 we could say afternoon is open door complaints day 14:55:30 like have a governance issue you would like solved, come complain to COlette 14:55:34 haha. "therapy hour, hosted by gothicmindfood" 14:56:04 you'll need some speaker to play relaxing music 14:56:16 I think I need to do some reaching out to folks to see what they might like to see 14:56:36 If the morning "more people at the same shorter time" period was also used for organisation, if people have compatible schedules, some folk could start some subtasks for the ML later in the week. 14:56:39 can I ask everyone to have a think about this and brainstorm in the etherpad with the vision - even if it's just sentence fragments/ideas? 14:57:04 personally I'd like us to make /some/ progress on one of the initiatives. A bi-weekly meeting doesn't trigger that much momentum forward 14:57:19 so if we need F2F to make progress, let's try to make some at the PTG 14:57:20 I will too, and I'll also start maybe a -dev list ask of folks to see what they might be interested in 14:57:33 ttx: agreed 14:57:38 ttx: +1 thats my preference, decide what to move forward 14:57:51 ok - so a planning session for the next months with the SWG 14:58:00 I would do a couple of hours brainstorm on the TC vision 14:58:06 well, and progress, resolve things in person 14:58:34 okay - these are all great ideas! I will get to the etherpad and the mailing list to discuss in the next week 14:58:35 currently it's going a bit in every direction so we are stalled 14:58:49 with limited ideas on how to make progress 14:59:22 oh a quick FYI and link, btw, superuser wrote up the SWG: 14:59:27 #link http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/openstack-stewardship-working-group/ 14:59:35 that said it's the type of exercise that works best in distraction-free setting, and with so many things running at the same time on Monday we will be distracted 14:59:52 well, no progress now the facilitating doesn't have a date, I was assuming we pause for the facilitation really 15:00:01 johnthetubaguy: for the vision, yes 15:00:08 but there are other things we can start to get to work on 15:00:15 okay - we're at time 15:00:23 let's take this to #openstack-swg 15:00:31 #endmeeting