15:01:04 #startmeeting openstack search 15:01:05 Meeting started Thu Nov 17 15:01:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sjmc7. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:08 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search' 15:01:17 o/ 15:01:21 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/search-team-meeting-agenda 15:01:26 o/ 15:01:33 Morning 15:01:43 I don’t have much on the agenda today 15:01:48 night 15:01:52 :) 15:02:00 o/ 15:02:07 o/ 15:02:14 There needs to be a greeting word for “good " 15:02:24 lol 15:02:42 o/ 15:03:37 ok, let’s get started 15:03:42 #topic ocata-1 milestone 15:03:57 Ocata-1 has to be tagged this week so I’ll be doing that sometime this afternoon 15:04:38 There are some reviews that are almost approved, so if we can get those in it would be good although this milestone’s not a big deal for us 15:05:52 Looks like maybe 6-7 reviews are crawling over the finishing line 15:06:53 So anyone who’s beginning their day rather than ending, if you’ve got a few minutes to spend on them, appreciated 15:07:08 #topic Ocata BPs 15:07:29 I started going through the list of BPs for ocata yesterday and then got distracted, but i noticed some that i think are already implemented 15:07:56 If there are any you filed that you think might be, it’d be helpful to close them. Otherwise I’ll go through the list and any that have reviews and look done i’ll close 15:08:47 Most of the BPs we have are for additional plugins, so if there are any bigger features people would like to see it’s not too late to get blueprints in for them 15:09:25 what plugins are in ocata's agenda 15:09:31 ironic and murano? 15:09:51 those, plus magnum, lbaas (octavia), glare 15:09:54 heat 15:10:07 ah alot 15:10:11 yeah 15:10:27 Yeah, though some may be easier than others 15:10:40 I have anonce: Ironic parts is done (on review), I start now active developement of sl plugin 15:11:04 yuriyz: yeah, i wanted to ask about that 15:11:08 cool 15:11:21 I had put some comments on it; was there anything that wasn’t clear or that you disagreed with? 15:11:50 if there’s anything we can do to help with it please let us know; we’re interested in getting it in 15:12:38 The plugin will be totally reworked because we change Ironic conception, so please look at it later when new version has been done 15:12:57 ah! then i’m glad i didn’t do more reviewing on it :) 15:13:22 Ok, thanks for letting us know - the offer stands if you need help, either drop into IRC or mailing list 15:13:44 I plan prepare worked version until the next week 15:13:54 Sure, no rush 15:14:25 The other big one was the notification publisher change that lei-zh is working on - are you still working on changes to that? 15:16:21 I guess not… 15:16:32 yeah, I'm working on it. I plan to abandon former patch to resubmit a new one. 15:16:42 Ok :) I’ll keep an eye out for that too 15:17:05 That was all i had for the agenda; still been busy with internal work. Did anyone else have anything they wanted to discuss? 15:17:08 #topic open discussion 15:18:15 guess not? 15:18:15 this one needs feedback: https://review.openstack.org/394489 15:19:05 yes - i was going to review that this morning. i did have a question about it though - if you use —notificationless and you have plugins in the same resource group that have handlers, it looks like the data would get lost? 15:22:00 anyway, i will re-run it and add a review. i think it might have to check whether there are other plugins in the group and either reindex them from ES or error out and enforce that notification-less plugins need their own group & index 15:22:51 ok, well, that was it for today then 15:23:06 I’ll leave the meeting open for a few minutes in case anyone has anything else but otherwise have a good weekend all 15:24:57 steve , do you suggest to update pipeline on original patch 15:25:19 yeah, that’s a problem there. 15:25:21 lei-zh: depends how drastic the changes are. i’m fine with a new patch if it’s very different 15:25:43 ok 15:26:34 yingjun: ok. either way seems fine; the easiest probably is to treat —notification-less as a shortcut for —type OS::Nova::Flavor —type OS::Nova::Hypervisor… and issue a warning if there are other plugins that’ll be reindexed from ES? 15:28:46 I'm towards to this one, reindexing notification plugins underneath looks like a black magic 15:29:12 i’m ok with this 15:29:54 ok. that should make the code simpler as well; you just need to turn —notificationless into a list of the types that don’t support plugins and maybe a warning/documentation 15:30:06 err.. ^don’t support notifications 15:31:14 ok, gonna end the meeting - i’m happy to continue this in the main channel if people want 15:31:15 thanks all! 15:32:01 #endmeeting