15:01:13 <TravT> #startmeeting openstack search
15:01:15 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 21 15:01:13 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is TravT. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:16 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:18 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search'
15:01:23 <sjmc7> morning
15:01:27 <TravT> o/
15:01:47 <lakshmiS> o/
15:01:48 <yingjun> o/
15:02:37 <TravT> allright, as usual agenda is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/search-team-meeting-agenda
15:02:48 <TravT> feel free to add
15:03:03 <rosmaita> o/
15:03:13 <TravT> lakshmiS: this time must be less fun for you now that you are PST
15:03:16 <TravT> ;)
15:03:43 <lakshmiS> yeah have to get up early
15:04:07 <lakshmiS> almost forgot last week :)
15:04:08 <TravT> well, thanks for making it
15:04:21 <TravT> so, mitaka 2 is done
15:04:33 <TravT> i submitted the release tag request yesterday
15:04:35 <TravT> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270522/
15:05:06 <TravT> and it went through 30 minutes ago. https://github.com/openstack/searchlight/releases/tag/0.2.0.0b2
15:05:15 <rosmaita> yay!
15:05:49 <TravT> for the client, we probably won't do a release until the end of mitaka
15:06:14 <TravT> gives us some time to play with it before setting it in stone
15:06:43 <sjmc7> yep, agree with that
15:06:54 <rosmaita> ++
15:07:07 <TravT> lhcheng found some feedback on it for us last night after the first two patches merged
15:07:19 <TravT> so we should take a look at that
15:08:00 <yingjun> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249076/
15:08:13 <yingjun> comment in ps12
15:08:28 <yingjun> from Lin
15:09:08 <TravT> basically
15:09:10 <TravT> openstack search resource type list
15:09:13 <TravT> instead of
15:09:29 <TravT> openstack search resource-type list
15:09:44 <sjmc7> hmm
15:10:29 <sjmc7> there doesn’t appear to be any reason given for not using a dash
15:10:48 <TravT> no, just the dean troyer doesn't like it
15:11:30 <sjmc7> i guess i don’t really have a strong opinion on it. seems weird coming from a unix background
15:11:33 <TravT> i suppose that one of the points of openstack client is some kind of consistency... which i think will be a little hard for us anyway.
15:11:45 <TravT> i don't know
15:12:19 <TravT> i'm inclined to see that third patch finished out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260899/
15:12:28 <sjmc7> since it’s merged, we can note lin’s concern as a separate bug
15:12:42 <TravT> then spend some time with it and ask for some feedback from the client team and ux team
15:12:57 <TravT> and deal with as bugs before releasing client
15:13:29 <sjmc7> yeah, i’d like to get that search functionality merged
15:13:49 <sjmc7> then the client’s at a useful enough state we can release it
15:14:02 <rosmaita> i think that approach -- merge & fix bugs -- makes sense, especially pre-official-release
15:14:27 <TravT> being able to actually use it will make it easier for us to evaluate
15:14:36 <rosmaita> moves the bikeshedding to a different patch
15:15:03 <sjmc7> :)
15:15:27 <TravT> I also think my patch to install it with devstack works now (although it seems to be stuck in zuul check queue)
15:15:30 <TravT> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268358/
15:16:21 <yingjun> will test that:)
15:16:31 <TravT> thanks
15:16:48 <TravT> it is a little easier to test now that your first two patches merged yingjun
15:17:03 <sjmc7> now there’s actually something there for it to register as an entry point? :)
15:17:20 <TravT> yeah, kind of makes a bit of a difference... ;)
15:18:13 <TravT> #topic bp and bug review slot
15:18:46 <TravT> so, now that we're in mitaka 3 timeframe, i thought we should do a full BP and bug review time like we've done at the beginning of other milestones
15:19:10 <TravT> we can either agree on an hour or so in addition to this meeting or perhaps dedicate next week's meeting to it
15:19:58 <sjmc7> happy to do either; i think we should try to do it sooner than later
15:19:59 <TravT> this is to just "groom" the list and help ensure priorities are set
15:21:18 <sjmc7> yep. but we also need to start doing the work
15:21:27 <TravT_> hmm, i dropped connection
15:21:41 <TravT_> any copy paste action?
15:21:43 <sjmc7> i’m gonna buy you an internet connection for christmas
15:22:03 <TravT_> i bought a fancy new ac1900 router over the weekend, hoping that might help
15:22:19 <sjmc7> no, you didn’t miss anything, except that i am concerned that the longer we wait to decide on specs the less time we have to do them
15:22:28 <rosmaita> do people have time tomorrow for spec review?
15:22:33 <sjmc7> sure
15:23:11 <rosmaita> maybe a little later in the day for lakshmiS ?
15:23:14 <lakshmiS> after 10:00 PST if its tomorrow since we have our internal meeting before that
15:23:45 <TravT_> tomorrow is my worst day for meetings this week
15:23:57 <sjmc7> we could shoot for monday
15:24:19 <sjmc7> waiting another week makes me a bit nervous; the cycle deadline is looming
15:24:32 <rosmaita> monday should be ok for me
15:24:34 <TravT_> here's my availability: any time rest of today.  1 PM EST or later.
15:24:52 <TravT_> the latter part of that was for tomorrow
15:25:01 <TravT_> 1 pm EST or later
15:25:48 <rosmaita> after 1pm EST today or tomorrow works for me
15:26:03 <sjmc7> me too, i think
15:26:05 <TravT> these times are probably all bad for yingjun
15:26:11 <TravT> yingjun: what is your timezone?
15:26:15 <yingjun> yep:(
15:26:24 <sjmc7> how about earlier on monday?
15:26:27 <yingjun> 23:26 now
15:26:31 <lakshmiS> my preference would be for tomorrow to get some time before tomorrow's demo
15:26:56 <yingjun> earlier monday work for me
15:27:12 <TravT> :S i've got something monday AM...
15:27:45 <TravT> what about this time tomorrow?
15:28:04 <yingjun> ok for me
15:28:05 <TravT> 15:00 UTC tomorrow
15:28:15 <rosmaita> i can do that
15:28:47 <sjmc7> um… yeah
15:29:21 <TravT> resounding vote of confidence sjmc7?
15:29:33 <sjmc7> checking calendar. yeah, i can do that
15:30:17 <TravT> lakshmiS: you could delay the swift plugin demo
15:30:47 <lakshmiS> i will try. i might miss the later part of the meeting to drop off my kid to school
15:30:49 <TravT> all, just FYI, lakshmiS volunteered to demo the swift plugin in an internal demo meeting tomorrow
15:31:05 <rosmaita> good job, lakshmiS !
15:31:20 <yingjun> nice
15:31:36 <lakshmiS> minus the notifications though!
15:31:45 <TravT> ok, i'm a complete moron
15:32:05 <TravT> tomorrow morning my daughter is giving her first presentation
15:32:21 <rosmaita> is she demoing the swift plugin too?
15:32:36 <TravT> i think the title has something to do with poor parenting
15:32:42 <lakshmiS> :)
15:32:42 <sjmc7> :)
15:32:48 <TravT> :D
15:32:51 <sjmc7> if she does a good job, bring her to Austin
15:33:36 <rosmaita> TravT: i went to a thing at my daughter's school where she read a story, and it began "if my dad wasn't always away on business trips"
15:33:44 <rosmaita> got a lot of dirty looks from the other parents
15:35:04 <TravT_> wow
15:35:16 <TravT_> okay, here's what i propose
15:35:30 <TravT_> please just go spend time looking at specs today
15:35:41 <TravT_> add comments
15:36:17 <TravT_> and let's have a meeting tuesday at 15:00 UTC if needed.
15:36:26 <sjmc7> works for me
15:36:30 <lakshmiS> +1
15:36:35 <RickA-HP> Sounds good.
15:36:40 <yingjun> ok
15:36:44 <rosmaita> am i looking in the wrong place: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/searchlight-specs isn't showing a lot of specs
15:36:53 <TravT_> there aren't many specs
15:37:02 <sjmc7> hurrah! :)
15:37:06 <TravT_> only those that had sufficient complexity
15:37:18 <sjmc7> there are also some BPs, though they’re more straightforward
15:37:19 <TravT_> otherwise they are just BPs
15:37:31 <sjmc7> they typically don’t need much discussion other than a pririoty
15:37:43 <TravT_> and then in next weeks regular meeting we will do a grooming of the BPs and the bugs for priority and targeting
15:37:46 <rosmaita> anyone have an easy link to the BPs to look at?
15:37:50 <TravT_> yep
15:38:05 <TravT_> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/searchlight
15:38:15 <TravT_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/searchlight
15:38:26 <rosmaita> ty
15:38:42 <TravT_> primarily the ones we need to look at on bp's are those targetted at mitaka and those without a priority.
15:39:00 <TravT> thanks rosmaita
15:39:27 <TravT> i'll send a meeting reminder to those here for the 15:00 Tuesday tie
15:39:30 <TravT> time
15:39:39 <TravT> #topic mid cycle
15:39:55 <TravT> so, i wasn't planning on formally proposing a searchlight mid cycle
15:40:30 <TravT> but i just wanted to mention that Steve and I both got approval to go to the horizon mid cycle and david-lyle said there will be plenty of room if we wanted to have some time on searchlight
15:40:42 <TravT> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/HorizonMitakaSprint
15:41:24 <rosmaita> i am not doing any travel!
15:41:31 <TravT> smart man
15:41:57 <TravT> so, i'm just putting that out there.
15:42:29 <TravT> i'm really hoping to have the horizon searchlight panel in pretty good shape by then
15:42:53 <sjmc7> yeah, that’d be nice
15:43:04 * TravT which would be easier if i stopped spending 95% of my time doing reviews
15:43:44 <TravT> #topic API docs
15:43:59 <TravT> Just a note that creating API docs now has a new process
15:44:17 <sjmc7> aww :(
15:44:17 <TravT> so, when we create actual API docs, we should follow it
15:44:28 <TravT> i've skimmed it and I think it should be better
15:44:37 <TravT> lakshmiS: looks like they use swagger now
15:45:00 <TravT> i know the previous API docs were kind of difficult to do and lakshmiS fought with them on glance a bit
15:45:14 <RickA-HP> Travis, do you have a link to the new process?
15:45:20 <TravT> http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/what-s-next-for-openstack-application-developer-guides?awesm=awe.sm_hPDfT
15:45:33 <RickA-HP> Thanks.
15:45:45 <TravT> Yeah, so just a heads up
15:45:57 <TravT> #topic     Cross Project Liaisons
15:46:22 <TravT> there has been an active effort to better formalize communication across projects
15:46:47 <TravT> and the reached out to all the PTLs to look at some specs on it
15:47:08 <TravT> the most recent one ratified identifying specific liasons for various duties
15:47:20 <TravT> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266072
15:47:24 <TravT> that's the spec
15:47:27 <TravT> but
15:47:42 <TravT> here's the wiki with the various liasions
15:47:43 <TravT> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons
15:48:05 <TravT> it defaults to PTL, but there is opportunity for each project to divvy up the duties
15:48:49 <sjmc7> i can do it unless anyone else has a burning desire to do so
15:49:34 <TravT> umm, you can do all of them?
15:49:43 <TravT> what are you volunteering for?
15:49:45 <sjmc7> umm… reading
15:49:51 <sjmc7> the oslo one, i hadn’t made it further down :)
15:50:29 <sjmc7> relman looks like it probably should be the PTL
15:50:39 <lakshmiS> i think the interproject liasons could be different to concentrate more on a specific project
15:51:27 <TravT> yeah, i put my name specifically on relman
15:51:36 <sjmc7> guess i can do docs as well, though i don’t think that’d affect us much at te moment
15:51:42 <RickA-HP> Do we want an interproject liaison for each plug-in?
15:51:42 <lakshmiS> like searchlight liason for glance
15:51:51 <lakshmiS> i can do that for glance and swift
15:52:21 <TravT> ok, i guess you can just add an entry
15:52:42 <lakshmiS> ok
15:53:07 <TravT> i added my name for cross project spec liaison as well, but if other's have interest we can add more than one person
15:54:28 <TravT> for vulnerability management, i thought sjmc7 and i would be good candidates as well
15:55:54 <sjmc7> umm.. yeah, i can do that
15:56:04 <TravT> ok, i'll add both our names their
15:56:06 <TravT> there
15:57:15 <RickA-HP> Travis, do you think we need an interproject liaison with Nova? If so I can do that.
15:58:19 <TravT> I don't know if we need to name one or not, but that'd be great if you do it if we need it
15:58:33 <TravT> usually the named ones are those that have a really tight inter dependency
15:58:43 <RickA-HP> Ok
15:58:45 <TravT> like nova getting angry at glance api
15:58:49 <sjmc7> yeah - i’m not sure we’re enough on anyone’s radar for them to come mention things to us
15:59:23 <TravT> ok, well update the wiki sections appropriately
15:59:30 <TravT> #topic out of time
15:59:35 <TravT> well, we're out of time for today
15:59:39 <TravT> the action is spec review
15:59:59 <TravT> #action (review specs https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/searchlight-specs)
16:00:10 <TravT> and we'll check in on Tuesday on that
16:00:22 <TravT> sjmc7, i'll also start looking at your role patch
16:00:26 <sjmc7> okey dokey
16:00:28 <TravT> Thanks everybody!
16:00:32 <TravT> #endmeeting