16:00:12 #startmeeting openstack-salt 16:00:13 Meeting started Tue Mar 22 16:00:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jasondotstar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_salt' 16:00:17 "/ 16:00:24 #topic roll call 16:00:25 o/ 16:00:36 \o 16:01:02 hi genunix 16:01:32 o/ 16:01:44 hello all 16:01:59 hi there 16:02:13 #topic Introduction 16:02:27 This meeting is for the openstack-salt team 16:02:35 if you're interested in contributing to the discussion, please join #openstack-salt 16:02:45 meetings are Weekly on Tuesdays at 1600UTC 16:02:55 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Salt_Team_Meeting 16:03:03 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-salt 16:03:19 #topic Review past action items 16:03:40 genunix to continue researching openstack packaging (with help from jasondotstar) 16:03:53 no progress yet according to the etherpad 16:03:57 jasondotstar: no progress :-( 16:04:00 oh :o 16:04:04 ok 16:04:06 np 16:04:27 same thing with mine with one exception 16:04:32 jasondotstar to research building RPMs using the openstack-ci 16:05:25 were you guys aware that there is an RPM-packaging group ? 16:06:04 dmllr is the chair 16:06:26 my plan was to show up to their meeting 16:06:52 and see if we can get some insight on these two items (as they relate to RPM packaging) 16:07:08 good idea IMO 16:07:21 #action genunix to continue researching openstack packaging (with help from jasondotstar) 16:07:39 #action jasondotstar to attend the RPM-packaging team meeting 16:08:02 let's see if we can make some headway this week and get some insight from them 16:08:19 #action jasondotstar to research building RPMs using the openstack-ci 16:08:33 ok next one: 16:08:40 iceyao to continue testing the centos aio deployment 16:09:03 dont see iceyao online 16:09:16 perhaps we move the meeting next week up to 1400UTC 16:10:26 yes is there a free slot? 16:10:34 at some meeting channel? 16:10:42 * jasondotstar checks... 16:11:54 1300UTC is available 16:11:57 according to the calendar 16:12:20 we would have to switch channels tho. 16:12:26 it wouldn't be held in this channel 16:12:40 it is fine with me 16:12:46 1300utc 16:13:01 either #openstack-meeting-3 or #openstack-meeting-4 16:13:09 either is fine 16:13:17 cznewt: +1 16:13:22 anyone else have objections ? 16:13:46 genunix has gone away for a minute 16:14:00 ok we can circle back to this 16:14:03 let's move on 16:14:07 but i could see in hs eyes that he aggrees :) 16:14:16 ok, yes 16:14:32 arif-ali to continue the preparation of the RH repos 16:14:36 cznewt: hehehe :-) ok 16:14:48 is arif-ali around? 16:15:30 if not, according to the etherpad, we're simply reusing RDO for now and Contrail redhat repos 16:15:46 yes for now, but running in some conflicts 16:15:54 in contrail dependencies 16:16:43 +1 16:16:46 but until we get better grasp on rpm repos, we'll have to stick to officials 16:16:52 +1 16:16:58 next 1 pls :) 16:17:13 iceyao to look into getting OVS networking operational 16:17:28 status on the etherpad: 16:17:30 I got contact from a guy, who already implemented DVR networking using our salt formulas, he was instructed how to use gerrit on friday. 16:17:44 any comments about this? 16:17:52 Yes, I don't have any more news about his progress 16:18:01 ok 16:18:05 same thing with the next one: 16:18:07 iceyao to get the neutron formula with OVS support ready 16:18:31 I tried to point him to the meeting 16:18:31 so we've got something worked up to support this it seems 16:18:41 I hope he will get the registration process right 16:18:49 we'll have to follow up on this one 16:19:05 yes can you give me task to track this to the next meeting? 16:19:11 ok sure 16:19:43 #action cznewt to follow up on DVR networking and the neutron salt formula with OVS support ready 16:19:48 I'll try to bring him here as well 16:20:03 cznewt: +! 16:20:06 cznewt: +1 16:20:11 next: 16:20:15 look into scheduling an informal openstack-salt session for our team 16:21:01 so, I found out recently that it's more than likely that I won't be able to attend Summit in April :-/ 16:21:21 bad news :( 16:21:30 still, the team should try to figure out a place to informally meet for those that are going to be in attendance... 16:21:38 cznewt: i know. i was looking forward to it. 16:21:59 i can assist with that 16:22:10 i just won't be able to be there (physically) 16:22:15 we were thinking to get around the vendors and invite them to session where we would show them how to add their stuff into it 16:22:25 storage drivers are simplest to implement 16:22:29 +1 16:22:44 then there are the sdns [a little harder] 16:23:00 +1 16:23:12 jasondotstar to check the irc meeting channels for an available meeting slot at 1400UTC 16:23:18 well, just did this one :-) 16:23:20 this would be something different event to the birds of feathers 16:23:26 so that's complete 16:23:44 cznewt: i think so. the informal is for the team here 16:24:05 sounds like you're talking about another meeting with vendors to discuss integration points, and etc. 16:24:12 yes, just wandering about marketing of this event 16:24:17 yes exactly 16:24:40 integration session to get overall knowledge of solution and to show them how simple it is to integrate 16:24:44 that may be difficult to obtain at this point 16:24:47 the BoF 16:24:52 but we can try 16:25:12 this is different to BoF, informal one, but marketed 16:26:01 well.... to me BoF is the 'sales pitch' meeting.... the informal session is just us.... IMHO 16:26:52 other BoFs were like that in the past, but I could be mistaken on the true intent of a BoF.... 16:27:30 either way, it's 2 different meetings with differing audiences for sure 16:27:39 yes 16:27:47 ok... 16:27:52 cznewt to update the team on the integration process of our salt formulas with saltstack 16:28:31 I have started discussion with david boucha 16:29:08 his quoted reply: "I'm looking over the formulas in the link you provided in your previous email. I'm really impressed! I'll dig a little deeper today." 16:29:24 \o/ 16:29:26 nice 16:29:30 this sounds promising, but today has passed already :) 16:29:48 we'll keep an eye on it 16:29:50 :-) 16:29:57 this is from past thursday, I'll try to persuade a little more :) 16:30:35 the matter is hard to solve 16:31:18 cool. 16:31:30 ok last one: 16:31:35 continue to report the status of the CentOS-based labs 16:31:51 this is similar to topic already discussed 16:32:16 the centos based lab is ready as the heat-based lab 16:32:38 the issue is the repository management 16:32:42 gotcha 16:33:13 so we need to make sure we know where our RPM pkgs are going to live long term 16:34:51 ok, any other comments on the tasks from last week? 16:35:13 if not, we can move to the next topic 16:35:53 not from me 16:36:14 ok 16:36:15 #topic Today's Agenda 16:36:33 so we talked a little about the topic on the board 16:36:42 the hw vendor session 16:36:48 wait, is genunix back? 16:36:56 can we confirm the 1300UTC timeslot? 16:37:08 b/c I can go ahead and work on the commit to change the meeting time... 16:38:33 ok we can circle back with genunix just to make sure that time is ok... sounds like it is 16:39:07 it's fine for me 16:39:13 much metter than now :) 16:40:39 nice 16:40:39 ok 16:41:01 #agreed the meeting timeslot will be moved to Tuesdays at 1300UTC 16:42:23 ok back to the hw vendor session 16:42:31 did you guys want to talk about this more? 16:43:39 yes 16:44:16 I was thinking what you have said 16:44:43 cool. 16:44:51 well, there's nothing else on the agenda 16:45:07 if there's nothing else, we can adjourn 16:45:14 give the chan 15mins back :-) 16:46:45 going once 16:46:49 twice? 16:47:02 ok thanks team. we will chat again next week. 16:47:06 I'll get back to the topic on our channel 16:47:10 yep 16:47:13 cznewt: ^ 16:47:18 #endmeeting