16:04:17 <portdirect> #startmeeting openstack-helm
16:04:18 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Dec  3 16:04:17 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is portdirect. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:04:19 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:04:22 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_helm'
16:04:45 <portdirect> agenda is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-helm-meeting-2019-12-03
16:05:03 <lamt> o/
16:05:05 <cheng1> o/
16:05:26 <portdirect> hey - so i need to applogise for some of the confusion around meetings times etc recently
16:05:34 <dwalt> o/
16:06:01 <portdirect> we need to move to this time, to avoid conflicting with the airship meeting, which operated on American Central time
16:06:17 <portdirect> and so with daylight saving, hit the 3pm utc timeslot
16:06:27 <portdirect> I'll have a email out to the ml today with this
16:06:52 <portdirect> the agenda is fairly light today
16:06:54 <portdirect> #topic Review backlog
16:07:14 <portdirect> I'm aware that we have built up a rather large review backlog over the last few weeks
16:08:21 <cheng1> Seem you core reviewers were busy on something in the last few weeks
16:08:51 <srwilkers> o/
16:08:55 <cheng1> On airship project?
16:09:34 <portdirect> partly, also a lot of traveling, usa holidays, and i think general life stuff (work etc) that seems to have hit everyone
16:10:26 <portdirect> so I'll be making it my personal priority to get through as much as i can
16:10:41 <portdirect> and im also sure that both lamt and srwilkers will be doing the same this week
16:11:02 <srwilkers> trying to, anyway - this time of year is always pretty hectic
16:11:06 <srwilkers> curse me for having a family
16:11:41 <cheng1> portdirect, thanks :)
16:12:57 <portdirect> this kinda segways into the next topic
16:13:06 <portdirect> #topic Gated charts
16:13:26 <portdirect> at one point in time all the charts in osh(main repo) were gated for functional operation
16:13:34 <portdirect> this is no longer the case
16:13:56 <portdirect> I'm working on octavia atm, but am not sure if there are any other outliers we should be aware of
16:14:15 <portdirect> thinks like dpdk are not going to be possible for us to gate in -infra
16:14:25 <srwilkers> i think there's quite a few honestly - i think the core services are the only ones gated against at the moment
16:14:27 <portdirect> but we should at least get basic functionaility of each chart tested
16:14:40 <srwilkers> the others only run as part of the periodic multinode job
16:14:48 <portdirect> thats ok
16:14:55 <portdirect> but they need to run somewhere
16:15:17 <portdirect> and be tested, eg i think though we deploy magnum
16:15:28 <portdirect> i dont think we actually run it through its paces?
16:15:36 <srwilkers> nope, dont think so
16:17:03 <portdirect> ok - once we have the review que under control
16:17:08 <portdirect> lets look at closing that
16:17:21 <portdirect> ok to move on?
16:17:37 <portdirect> #topic ovs per-host overrides support
16:17:41 <portdirect> cheng1: floor is yours
16:18:08 <cheng1> I would like to implement per-host overrides of ovs chart https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006965
16:18:32 <portdirect> that would be fantastic
16:18:41 <cheng1> To support ovs-dpdk, we added some paremeters for ovs chart
16:19:13 <cheng1> many of them should be per-host level instead of global configurations
16:19:43 <cheng1> for example, the pmd_cores
16:20:47 <cheng1> I will create a patch for the per-host overrides
16:22:11 <portdirect> that would be fantastic cheng1
16:22:49 <cheng1> portdirect, thanks
16:23:30 <portdirect> ok - anything else we should be talking abou this week before moving (back) onto reviews?
16:24:59 <srwilkers> not that i can think of
16:25:43 <cheng1> portdirect, one thing to confirm
16:26:09 <cheng1> So we will not enable the dpdk gate right?
16:27:43 <portdirect> cheng1: we cannot, as not all of the vms we get from nodepool support dpdk
16:28:15 <portdirect> we could however have a check that runs dpdk opporunisticly when a vm that supports it is provided to the pipeline
16:28:33 <cheng1> portdirect, got it
16:29:29 <portdirect> #topic reviews
16:30:18 <portdirect> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673950/  (ovs bond support)
16:30:18 <portdirect> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/664220/  (ovs-dpdk CI)
16:30:18 <portdirect> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696893/ (fix osh-infra armada manifests)
16:30:18 <portdirect> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667989/ (disble nagios page tours by default)
16:30:18 <portdirect> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/688818/ (ovs-dpdk readness)
16:30:31 <portdirect> the above i think really deserve some special love
16:30:54 <portdirect> can we prioritise reviewing these
16:31:39 <portdirect> if there is nothing else today, then we can wrap up
16:36:24 <portdirect> #endmeeting