14:05:13 #startmeeting openstack-cyborg 14:05:14 Meeting started Wed Sep 26 14:05:13 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Li_Liu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:05:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:05:18 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' 14:05:28 #info Coco_gao 14:05:29 #topic Roll Call 14:05:37 #info Li_Liu 14:06:55 Who else do we have 14:06:57 hi 14:07:01 #info sum12 14:07:02 Hi Xinran 14:07:19 hi 14:07:22 Is Sandar around? 14:07:42 #info xinran 14:08:23 I was hoping to discuss some nova related question with him 14:08:50 #topic post-ptg work items 14:09:15 Coco, how is the DB evolution going? 14:10:01 Since we have VARs discussed in PTG, we still need VAR table. 14:10:12 I have looked into ptg summary, we will support a device profile in this release? 14:10:20 Yes 14:10:38 what's the dependency for VAR? 14:10:40 we need to support dev_profile in Stein 14:10:50 does it involve nova folks? 14:11:57 nova only use VARs, and will update VARs' status by calling os-acc, I think 14:12:06 what is VAR 14:12:50 We should have a discuss on what field still remained and what else should be removed as well as the new table field 14:13:53 Do you and XiaoHei need any help with this? 14:14:36 we may need Sundar's help on VAR table 14:15:22 what is VAR ? 14:16:06 I think I can make a draft then we can discuss it together, Since Sundar wrote the recent Specs on device discovery and interactions with nova, he may have some advice I think. 14:16:18 Virtual Accelerator Record (VAR) 14:17:25 Coco_gao: thanks, 14:17:34 ok, Sundar is busy with his specs right now most likely 14:17:58 I will talk with him and see how to balance his work 14:18:11 Seems there will be a changement at db layer? 14:18:17 I have a feeling we have too much work depend on him right now 14:18:31 xinran, yes. 14:19:10 Yes I think so, because he wrote the specs 14:19:37 Li_Liu: could you please elaborate it or is there any docs concerning that? 14:19:37 Yeap, most of specs. 14:20:53 We should follow the spec right? 14:21:00 Regarding the db change, I think Coco_gao is still drafting it 14:21:34 but the you can find related information here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-ptg-stein 14:21:56 But I and xiaohe talked to Sundar that he should not write the implementation details on his spec. Who write the code decide the details 14:22:19 OK 14:22:23 thanks 14:22:29 Coco_gao, thist's the right way 14:23:28 Ok, move on. 14:23:38 Li_Liu: were there any notes taken during the discussion with neutron team during PTG? 14:24:20 sum12, there are some notes here 14:24:21 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fpga-networking 14:24:45 thanks 14:25:02 sum12, also https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-ptg-stein-summary 14:26:11 I saw Xinran is have 4 patches waiting :P 14:26:21 I will take a look and provide comments 14:26:29 thanks Cato_gao 14:26:44 hope to clear them up soon 14:26:53 Li_Liu: thank 14:27:03 *thanks 14:27:24 And I will submit another patch of os-acc soon 14:27:29 I am still working on FPGA programming api. Just solve the glance client problem should provide a updated patch some within the week 14:27:50 xinran, you are our super hero right now~~ 14:28:10 About parse the flavor.extra_spec to the acceptable format to cyborg api 14:28:26 Li_Liu: lol 14:28:53 But these patches still need ovo land first 14:29:31 right, you might need to sync up with Coco and Xiaohei for that 14:30:03 Coco_gao wangzhh 14:30:07 Li_Liu: yes, I have pull their patch to local and tested 14:30:30 the DB evolution is a huge change if we merge two tables(accelerators and deployables) as Sundar's suggest. Should we keep the old one? 14:30:32 :) Xiaohei... 14:30:38 Got it. 14:31:32 and evolve to the new version? 14:32:21 Agree. I suggest keep the old one now. 14:33:41 everything will be changed after db evolution, the ovo, my patch on device object should also be rewritten. 14:34:06 I agree, let's keep the old one and decide when to remove it later 14:35:07 The old one is the current one? 14:35:16 yes 14:35:16 Coco, not really. Most of them can be reused. And we should hava a quick start. 14:35:23 I mean acc dep these 2 tables 14:35:33 yes. 14:38:33 Ok, but my placement repot patch depends on ovo now 14:42:41 ok, I think we are clear on the work item and their dependencies 14:42:58 Let's do this :) 14:43:04 #topic AoB 14:44:32 If we don't merge the two tables, then DB evolution is not urgent. Maybe I can do something more urgent right now. 14:46:52 Coco_gao, I think xinran is worried if she's implementing based on old DB design, once you new DB is merged, she might have to rewrite the code over again 14:47:18 I think so, not only xinran's code. 14:47:49 we finish rocky's target first? 14:48:00 My code is now based on coco’s ovo patch :) 14:48:38 i see 14:49:02 Any feedback pls contact me directly, thanks xinran 14:49:10 Coco_gao, yes, try to finish up R's left over first 14:49:40 So I think it’s ok for me if we use ovo design 14:51:26 I think the urgent thing is the docs~~ 14:51:26 alright, let's wrap up. 14:51:49 Coco_gao I will work with Sundar on that to speed it up 14:52:27 I can join from this week, feel free to contact me if I can help. 14:52:37 sure 14:52:41 thanks Coco 14:52:55 have a night night guys 14:52:59 #endmeeting