15:06:57 #startmeeting openstack-cyborg 15:06:58 Meeting started Wed Aug 2 15:06:57 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is zhipeng. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:06:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:07:01 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' 15:07:13 #topic patch discussion 15:07:57 zhuli i see you gave a -1 to the pep8 patch 15:08:04 any specific reason for that ? 15:09:55 the reason is same from Rushil 15:10:25 the comments need to be addressed 15:14:21 zhuli, You maybe need to provide a -1 15:15:02 i see, i will do that 15:15:39 got disconnected ... 15:17:36 any other outstanding issue ? 15:17:47 crushil you got other upcoming patches ? 15:18:04 Waiting for y'all's to get merged 15:18:34 ?? 15:18:48 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg 15:18:55 there are no patches from you 15:19:42 I know 15:20:24 But I am waiting for the API and DB patches to get merged 15:20:55 I need to base off my next change on zhuli and jkilpatr's patches 15:22:16 I have a stub patch in. Now, we need a dev setup where we can play with all this. It can be ansible generated or it can be devstack generated 15:22:41 Does this make sense? 15:22:48 yes get your point 15:23:06 +1 15:23:17 Hi folks. 15:23:28 hey mikes 15:44:59 hey 15:45:11 man I need to put on a klaxxon or somthing for this meeting, I keep getting caught up 15:46:01 jkilpatr no problem 15:46:10 crushil, I agree my db commit is stubby I say we land zhuli crushil and my patches then I'll put up a patch for the installer 15:46:44 cool 15:46:55 my initial driver stub is already in 15:47:14 wonder if we can get someone else to host the CI job or if I should just do it. 15:47:23 I need to make some additions and I will push that in this week 15:47:35 as a note I'm going to test/target Tripleo with my install playbook, a playbook for targeting devstack I'll need help with. 16:21:01 jkilpatr would Tripleo be a overkill for us ? 16:22:45 zhipeng, for random development work it totally is. I just happen to have tripleO clouds by the dozen since testing it is a big part of my role. 16:23:03 ah ok 16:42:55 zhipengh[m], that being said it's probably best to test for 'prod' setups along instead of being devstack only until everything works there only to see it all break again when we try to deploy for real 16:43:29 yes I agree with that 12:24:24 zhipengh[m] : are you considering a tag/branch for pike for cyborg? 12:42:01 dims I'm definitely interested, although not familiar with the release engineering process 12:43:33 zhipengh[m] : most of the steps are documented here - https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html 12:45:44 zhipengh[m] : there's more stuff on this page - https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#tagging-a-release 12:46:18 see "Tagging a Release" for example 12:46:46 THX ! :) 12:49:19 zhipengh[m] : please join #openstack-release channel and we can talk more there if you have any questions 12:50:00 zhipengh[m] : since both cyborg and mogan are in the same boat, i've asked zhenguo to ping you as well 12:50:24 Haha ok 12:53:11 Looks similar to what we've been doing in OPNFV for release 12:54:10 dims since cyborg is not official, what would be the benefit to cut a release ? 12:55:22 zhipengh[m] : it's part of the process to become official, you can tell folks that there's a tag/branch for use with a specific openstack release if they wish to try it 12:55:47 Ah right 12:56:09 I remember Joe did this for tricircle 12:56:41 when it comes time to submit for governance, we can show that we have been putting out releases already and possibly picked up some operators/users 13:00:20 That is a great point 13:05:46 okey I think the meetbot should capture dims's conversation on tag/branch 13:05:51 #endmeeting