16:00:04 <j^2> #startmeeting openstack-chef
16:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Aug 31 16:00:04 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is j^2. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef'
16:00:15 <j^2> hey everyone!
16:00:32 <j^2> here’s the agenda:
16:00:34 <markvan_> howdy
16:00:34 <j^2> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-chef-meeting-20150831
16:01:01 <sc`> o/
16:01:05 <markvan> /msg NickServ identify kramvan
16:02:02 <j^2> :D
16:03:44 <j^2> 2 more mins then i’ll start
16:05:36 <j^2> nice
16:05:42 <j^2> #topic specs.openstack.org
16:05:59 <j^2> i think the tl;dr of this, we should get this done by Toyko
16:07:10 <j^2> any objections?
16:08:34 <j^2> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4zyjLyBp64
16:10:04 <j^2> #topic <j^2> AIO-Neutron Update: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196858/
16:10:30 <j^2> this was successful and merged
16:10:43 <j^2> the next challange is to get the initial networks built
16:11:13 <j^2> we may want to hand this off to Tempest or something like that; but we need to come to a descision
16:11:22 <j^2> any thoughts?
16:13:10 <markvan> would agree that more network testing is needed, but repo tests should remain simple to push stable development
16:13:19 <j^2> i could see that yeah
16:13:47 <j^2> we don’t want to leverage tempest/rally as our “yes this builds correctly?” bench mark?
16:13:56 <j^2> it would require more understanding of Tempest tests though
16:14:37 <sc`> i think tempest is a good quantifier of if openstack builds correctly
16:15:32 <j^2> it seems reasonable to start spending some time with tempest tests to start building one for our AIO builds
16:15:39 <j^2> both nova and neutron right?
16:15:42 <markvan> yup, expanding to include more tempest tests is a good thing
16:16:14 <markvan> not sure on state of nva networking going forward (past liberty...)
16:16:17 <markvan> nova
16:16:55 <j^2> yeah after the ops meetup only one person put up his hand saying he was using nova networking in production
16:17:09 <j^2> it’s going away really (one or two releases) soon
16:17:29 <sc`> we don't even use it in development
16:18:00 <sc`> aio-neutron should become the focus Soon(tm)
16:18:03 <j^2> so shall we say we plan on getting _better_ / _more_complete_ tempest tests for this liberty release?
16:19:45 <markvan> yeah that sounds reasonable
16:20:20 <j^2> we have already lost over 3/4 of the cycle, so i’d like to make reasonable expectations
16:23:07 <j^2> anything else on this topic?
16:24:05 <j^2> #topic stable/kilo
16:24:18 <j^2> we have only a couple reviews left
16:24:23 <j^2> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217886/
16:24:23 <j^2> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217923/
16:24:23 <j^2> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217931/
16:24:23 <j^2> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217934/
16:24:23 <j^2> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217935/
16:24:54 <j^2> if we can rally on these and get them pushed through today it would amazing progress
16:25:29 <j^2> and glanceclient 1.0.0 was just released too!
16:25:30 <j^2> python-glanceclient 1.0.0: OpenStack Image API Client Library
16:27:28 <j^2> any other blockers for stable/kilo cleanup?
16:28:45 <markvan> just a few more tweaks, looks like I may have messed up a couple patches
16:29:29 <j^2> ah cool
16:29:37 <markvan> I still see all 18 patches out there for stable kilo...need to some reviews going
16:30:00 <markvan> Only a few left for liberty now
16:30:03 <j^2> yeah we have a problem, we only really have 3ish sometimes 5 reviewers right now
16:30:19 <jklare> hi o/
16:30:44 <j^2> i think we may have to allow +2 CR to allow +1 WF :-/
16:31:00 <j^2> hey jklare
16:31:19 <markvan> infra is very slow right now, but the rest of the liberty patches are in the queue
16:31:26 <sc`> i'll see if i can spare some cycles to help with stable/kilo, but it probably won't be until later in the day
16:32:23 <j^2> sc`: :D
16:33:40 <j^2> nice
16:33:50 <markvan> Need to get the common one in first...https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217874/
16:33:56 <j^2> #topic <markvan> would like to understand why the periodic test job is not working
16:34:01 <markvan> as the bootstrap changed
16:34:41 <j^2> markvan: can we get this change added to the wiki so we can have part of the doc?
16:34:45 <j^2> we have one don’t we?
16:34:48 <jklare> actually i asked about that multiple times in the infra channel, but got no aswer
16:35:08 <markvan> jklare: yup, will update wiki branch notes
16:35:18 <markvan> jklare: bummer, we really need to get this one going
16:35:51 <jklare> not sure, maybe its easier to get one of them during US business hours
16:37:25 <j^2> yep that’s probably true
16:38:27 <j^2> cool, anything else?
16:38:51 <jklare> anybody looked at this spec about refactoring the config templates yet?
16:39:03 <j^2> nope not yet
16:39:07 <j^2> i guess it’s time i d :D
16:39:10 <j^2> i do*
16:39:23 <markvan> sorry, got side tracked each time I started on it
16:39:23 <jklare> i already did this for our own forks of the cookbooks and cleaned up about 2500 lines of code
16:39:33 <j^2> oh hell yes
16:39:36 <jklare> per cookbook
16:39:37 <j^2> that’s amazing
16:40:24 <jklare> but yeah, that also meant loosing some switch-case functionality
16:40:31 <jklare> which is fine imo
16:40:49 <j^2> can you send an example to make sure i know what you mean?
16:40:56 <j^2> link*
16:42:54 <j^2> #topic <markvan> http://kramvan1.github.io/cookbook-openstack-doc/
16:42:59 <j^2> any movement here?
16:44:47 <markvan> I'll run it again after liberty dust settles
16:45:32 <j^2> awesome
16:46:09 <j^2> #topic Open Floor
16:46:17 <j^2> if anyone has anything we have 15 mins
16:46:31 <j^2> or we can close if i have a second to close, and we get 15 mins back
16:46:42 <jklare> i got an answer on this periodic thing
16:46:58 <jklare> it is not running because periodic jobs are not allowed to have any filters on branches
16:47:24 <jklare> and the suggestion is that we create a branch specific job for each branch we want to have tested periodically :D
16:47:42 <sc`> markvan: it's weird, that sleep thing. i saw it fail on centos 6, but running sleep 10s on a mac works without issue
16:48:23 <markvan> sc`: yup, worked for me on ubuntu
16:48:42 <markvan> jklare: I guess having it targeted for master would be good place to start
16:48:49 <jklare> i will put in another review for the branch specific job for kilo and master later
16:49:00 <j^2> jklare: nice
16:49:18 <j^2> sc`, markvan, i missed it what “sleep thing?"
16:50:01 <markvan> j^2: just chatting about recent bug sc` might have found.   sc` since 's' seconds is the default, I'm fine with removing it.
16:50:51 <j^2> ah cool
16:52:02 <j^2> nice, anything else?
16:52:17 <j^2> I’ll have the agenda posted for next week in a couple hours
16:53:21 <sc`> markvan: awesome. will push a patch up
16:59:50 <j^2> #endmeeting