15:30:03 #startmeeting Openstack-Chef 15:30:04 Meeting started Thu Feb 26 15:30:03 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is j^2. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:07 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef' 15:30:18 Hey everyone! 15:32:25 howdy 15:32:29 'sup 15:32:55 I'd like to go on record thanking everyone for their flexibility these last couple of weeks/meetings. I've had some personal life excitement and scares and appreciate everyone pitching in 15:33:51 And with that statement let's take it to what we all want the discuss... 15:34:10 #topic final mile to stable/juno 15:34:27 Here's the list of patches that are left for Juno stable: 15:34:28 https://review.openstack.org/159254 15:34:28 https://review.openstack.org/159252 15:34:28 https://review.openstack.org/159265 15:34:28 https://review.openstack.org/156416 15:34:29 https://review.openstack.org/158845 15:34:47 and with that we also need to switch the repo over to the new testing suite. 15:34:57 Currently testing the metadata ones on centos 15:35:51 Ok, so the repo should be able happen ASAP 15:36:18 Any of those patches gated by anything we don't control? 15:36:27 yup, one pull request I put up yesterday to start to break down the doc 15:36:40 no, these patches are straight forward 15:36:47 Rock on 15:37:21 It's the mariadb stuff that is gated by that cookbook being updated in community, but we really don't need that until kilo 15:38:17 The fix for the floating ip was questioned by Jan, so I think that one will be going away as the code works as is, just needs better doc. I'm getting that doc ready now. 15:39:12 Cool this all sounds extremely positive 15:39:24 So, I would like to get the repo branched and updated today. Then get a few confirmations that is still works, and we're ready for the juno branch. 15:40:16 Awesome I can take ownership of that assuming I get my laptop 15:41:14 ok, I get that last PR looked at and then start creating a patch, that can be done in parallel with the repo branch work. 15:42:47 Yep the repo should be independent of anything else, minus the Berksfile.lock but that's after the stamp happens and we have the SHAs 15:45:50 And we never got multi nova with CentOS 7 correct? 15:46:10 j^2: No, I’m getting weird mysql issues 15:46:14 it just hangs for me 15:46:16 j^2: do you have that link to the wiki for the branck work, 15:47:14 yeah, I tried it but had the issue with old host-only dhcp entries, have not gone back yet 15:48:39 markvan: one sec let me see if I can get you the link 15:49:19 nm got it, I'm going to update it a bit more and add a link to it from our releases topic 15:49:56 I was going to start adding the list of items to look on the flip side, initial kilo master work items 15:49:58 cmluciano: and markvan cool no worries on the CentOS 7 multi nova I just wanted verify I had the information 15:50:11 Correct* 15:51:07 So, speaking of centos/redhat, I think the basic cookbook are looking good now, so this table should be update to include it now, agreed? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Chef/GettingStarted 15:51:21 (see Releases table near bottom) 15:52:39 #agreed markvan on updating the wiki 15:52:49 #agreed 15:53:19 k, I'll do that shortly, and then update it again once the stable juno branch is in place. 15:53:27 Kk 15:55:11 jklare: any concerns on your end? 15:55:14 so, to net for Juno work left: a few patches (and I'll update the float one to a doc update), branch repo, patch repo, then branch the cookbooks, cleanup patches 15:55:51 markvan: yep 16:02:46 Question 16:03:54 Has everyone whose committed to our code since Paris summit gotten their ATC for Vancouver? 16:04:32 I probably have not 16:04:39 #topic general discussions 16:04:57 humm, our code is in stackforge and that does not count for ATC, only base openstack does 16:05:18 Infra patches do though 16:05:28 Right? 16:05:47 I saw something earlier this week or so about >juno only targeting centos 7. should us folks on 6 be accelerating our testing of centos 7? 16:05:53 yup, infra is part of it 16:06:39 sc`: yeah that's a very good idea 16:06:40 sc`: yes, I saw that as well, base kilo+ want nothing to do with <7 centos/redhat 16:08:24 j^2: I usually help out in the openstack security docs to get my ATC 16:08:29 so that makes me sad about stackforge then, its like we're no longer part of the OpenStack world. They demoted us even more 16:09:39 how about the nova-api and nova-api-metadata conflict? I saw another related bug to it in lp 16:10:02 BTW, the ATC email should come from: communitymngr@openstack.org so check your spam 16:10:27 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-chef/+bug/1418797 16:10:28 Launchpad bug 1418797 in OpenStack + Chef "[compute] Can not set metadata_listen for nova-metadata-api" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Wei Hu (huwei-xtu) 16:10:46 I thought the override rejigger was the way to work around that api compute thingy 16:10:56 sc`: yeah, there are a couple of bugs, but the patches are not ready. For the testing repo we have done the workaround, just remove the metadata from the enabled apis attribute. 16:10:59 , 16:11:22 sc`: that ^^^ 16:12:02 ok, cool. I'm glad to help test a longer term solution wherever possible when it emerges 16:12:05 As I chatted in the bug, I think we should decide 1 path for metadata, and not try to support 2. My thought is to go with using the recipe and disable support for the enabled api attribute with metadata. 16:12:41 Since we have a workaround now, I did not put this on the list for must have in Juno. 16:12:42 I've been trying to get it to disable in the recipe, but haven't had much luck 16:12:48 but, open to other thoughts here 16:13:51 yeah, I don't like trying to mess with a good recipe, so that's why I suggest we go the other route, just disallow metadata from the enabled_apis and force the use of the recipe path. 16:14:47 yep. makes sense 16:16:08 Anything else outstanding? 16:17:06 I'm still trying to figure out why nova-cert and nova-novncproxy don't get their init scripts on occasion 16:17:20 so far, I see it on centos 6/icehouse and centos 7/juno 16:17:23 CentOS? 16:17:29 I'm good, I'll get the float and repo patches up soon. 16:17:56 sc`: yup I saw it once on centos7, but 2nd time it worked, not sure what's going on 16:18:21 yeah. not sure if it's just chef being chef, or if there's actually an issue in the cookbooks 16:18:49 Maybe a template is clashing with a pkg install of one? 16:23:37 Cool if nothing left I'll close the official meeting 16:24:00 #endmeeting