16:00:40 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:00:41 Meeting started Tue Nov 17 16:00:40 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:44 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:35 #topic bug triage 16:01:42 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1904327 16:01:43 Launchpad bug 1904327 in openstack-ansible "msgpack version causing linuxbridgeagent to fail on ubuntu 18" [Undecided,New] 16:01:55 James Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS/OVN deployments on CentOS 8 https://review.opendev.org/762661 16:01:58 jamesdenton: have you ever seen smth like this? 16:02:21 can't say i have 16:03:09 python2 on train? is that right? 16:03:28 I think stdout from stein 16:03:35 i see related bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.privsep/+bug/1844822 16:03:35 Launchpad bug 1844822 in oslo.privsep "linuxbridge agent crash after R ->S upgrade" [Undecided,New] 16:04:21 it really is 16:04:27 same OP 16:06:47 i guess the best we can do is prod oslo to see if they can patch it? 16:07:44 ok, so now it's max_buffer_size 16:08:14 https://msgpack-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html#msgpack.Unpacker 16:09:22 that matches up with this https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.privsep/+bug/1844822/comments/5 16:09:23 Launchpad bug 1844822 in oslo.privsep "linuxbridge agent crash after R ->S upgrade" [Undecided,New] 16:09:54 but default is 1024*1024*100 16:11:55 Ok, well, I can bump ofc version of msgpack but it's in u-c so the only chance to do that is to use global-requirement-pins 16:12:05 however I'm not sure if it's our bug or not 16:12:23 I'd rather left it to oslo and try to figure out the best way here to proceed 16:13:06 James Denton proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Test OVS/OVN deployments on CentOS 8 https://review.opendev.org/762661 16:13:08 oh, wait, it's msgpack 1.0 docs 16:14:26 but it does not support py2.... 16:17:24 ok, so interesting one was https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1903846 16:17:26 Launchpad bug 1903846 in openstack-ansible " libvirt fails to start because --listen parameter is not permitted with systemd activation socket " [Undecided,New] 16:17:41 I haven't check it in detail yet 16:19:52 I'm wondering what libvirt do we get on systmes... 16:20:08 as it's failing since 5.7.0 16:21:04 bionic on train looks good 16:21:54 so it's from https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt/commit/3a6a725b8f575890ee6c151ad1f46ea0ceea1f3b 16:23:00 does this say which OS versions the bug report is for 16:24:05 nope, don't see it 16:24:15 But focal will have issues for sure 16:25:17 libvirt docs are pretty confusing for me..... 16:25:29 so do we need those socket listener services started/stopped on nova_libvirtd_listen_tcp/tls ansible vars 16:25:53 systemctl start libvirtd-tls.socket 16:25:56 that sort of thing 16:26:30 and we should not use libvirtd.conf for it anymore 16:26:41 https://opendev.org/openstack/puppet-nova/src/branch/master/releasenotes/notes/libvirt-systemd-socket-units-f7b0fc3a4f3c5219.yaml 16:26:43 but um... how to define address to listen on... 16:27:27 well, ok, it's valid and has high priority 16:27:48 yeah so its config_template and [socket] a.b.c.d:port sort of format 16:28:18 yeah, seems like that 16:28:19 or systemd_service with overrides 16:28:48 https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.socket.html 16:29:27 it was so easier in libvirtd.conf :) 16:30:16 also what I'm wondering if we can just move to systemd for previous branches - if this new way won't break pre 5.7 libvirt 16:32:07 I think that's most interesting unporcessed ones. 16:34:36 we should also be close to a victoria RC? 16:35:06 #topic ffice hours 16:35:30 well, regarding rc - we need branching for that and I'm pretty stuck with fixing upgrade jobs for magnum 16:35:47 but I've placed beta 16:36:01 is there something to look at for the magnum problem? 16:36:07 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/762821/ 16:36:31 So I've got https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758461/ 16:36:59 but https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755569/5 still fails 16:37:14 and it's not only about magnum - octavia fails the same way 16:37:35 they both don't have ability to sent endpoint in tempest plugin 16:38:10 magnm fails on tempest https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_bf0/755569/5/check/openstack-ansible-upgrade-aio_metal-ubuntu-focal/bf0ca28/logs/openstack/aio1-utility/stestr_results.html 16:39:05 I'm about to jsut abandon 758461 and set upgrade jobs non-oting for magnum and octavia.... 16:39:22 will probably try to spend some little time on fixing.... 16:39:35 but really concidering just setting then to nv 16:40:51 interesting that octavia fails, becasue i have some memory of fixing the tempest plugin 16:41:07 that was perhaps for no ssl verification rather than endpoint 16:42:14 We have this: https://github.com/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/blob/master/octavia_tempest_plugin/config.py#L48 16:43:00 oh, will try this out now 16:45:34 hm, we already have it https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/tests/roles/bootstrap-host/templates/user_variables_octavia.yml.j2#L24 16:45:46 but not during test https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/d3e6a58048f944aea338979c65626418/log/logs/etc/host/tempest/tempest.conf.txt#164 16:45:48 interesting 16:46:03 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: Fix linter errors https://review.opendev.org/755576 16:49:18 why are those missing? 16:50:18 maybe I depended on patch that wasn't rebased on top of the fix 16:51:17 it was added not so far ago or for octavia we're re-defining 16:51:22 https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/commit/eae210982469d3fdb190e61acb6d19df5f008374 16:51:55 probably it was more than that 16:52:10 when amphora was trying to reach octavia api or smth like this... 16:56:55 but from my point this is the major things that stops us at the moment 16:58:00 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Added Netplan examples for a Openstack Infrastructure node. https://review.opendev.org/760090 16:58:46 and also we need to get to https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752040/3 one day... 16:58:57 as it's really a bug we need to look at 17:00:28 #endmeeting