16:00:21 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:00:22 Meeting started Thu Feb 16 16:00:21 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is andymccr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:25 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:00:43 #topic Roll call 16:00:46 o/ 16:00:48 o/ 16:01:26 i'll wait til 4:05! 16:01:42 It's going to be an intimate gathering today :) 16:01:55 o/ 16:02:06 o/ 16:02:20 it appears that github may be wobbling a little 16:02:25 ahh fun 16:02:27 0/ 16:02:36 we're getting gate failures due to role download fails 16:02:40 lol evrardjp did you grow a bigger head? 16:02:47 o/ 16:02:50 o/ 16:03:06 alextricity25: let's put that on my headache 16:03:09 :p 16:03:13 :( 16:03:21 haha don't be ... 16:04:02 ok i think we're good to go! 16:04:13 #topic Review action items from last week 16:04:47 aside from the congratulatory action items. we have one to follow up on! 16:05:07 cloudnull: mhayden - did you manage to draft a spec for monitoring/metrics in OSA 16:05:44 . 16:05:55 well neither of them are here im guessing :) i know mhayden has a meeting. but next week is the PTG so i'll try follow up on that with them sowe can have something in place before next week ifpossible 16:06:26 #topic Operations guide 16:06:30 asettle: ^ 16:06:30 Oops sorry I'm here 16:06:45 Hey peeps 16:06:53 Basically, this one is up: https://review.openstack.org/431499 16:07:01 Please review, I'd like to get some of this stuff through before the PTG 16:07:02 I'm working on the rabbitmq review again today 16:07:07 thanks stevelle :) 16:07:26 We still are looking for people to fill in some gaps - let me or spotz know if you're keen 16:07:38 I am PTLing at the PTG now, which conflicts with the OSA schedule 16:07:48 So if someone can represent this at the summit, that would be great :) 16:07:56 I'd like to see this guide in a decent condition before the summit 16:07:59 at the PTG* 16:08:12 also looks like the rabbitmq review got workflow a few moments ago, so that is done. 16:08:18 nice! 16:08:29 I'm good dudes :) 16:08:30 Thanks 16:08:44 ok good, i'll make sure that guide is a topic of discussion at the PTG 16:08:48 speaking of! 16:08:49 ugh thanks stevelle 16:08:51 gate faileure 16:08:55 #topic PTG 20-24 february 16:09:09 Next week is the PTG - the etherpad is still up 16:09:25 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-ptg-pike 16:09:29 asettle yes, gate failure due to the aforementioned github croaks - not patch related 16:09:41 odyssey4me: yeha cool figures. I just rechecked but I'll wait. 16:09:57 any ideas, last chances to get them in! and as always if you have any other topics to bring up and cant be there reach out to me (today or tomorrow!) 16:10:28 Thanks andymccr :) I think I got mine in 16:10:32 excellent! 16:10:48 one other note - since its the PTG there will be no bug triage or meeting next week. I'll adjust the topic in the main channel 16:11:24 anymore on the PTG topic? 16:11:49 ok! SO 16:11:52 #topic Releases 16:12:29 things are going well with the Ocata release so far I believe - we have an additional 2 weeks for our final release. (Mar 6 - 10) 16:12:42 so anything you need in for the official ocata release please get them in before then 16:13:10 i'll propose a new release for mitaka/newton next week 16:13:31 That's pretty much that! 16:13:33 great 16:13:34 andymccr we'd love it if you could sha bump newton this week :) 16:13:34 andymccr: There's an inventory fix I'd like to see get in 16:13:47 palendae: ahh yes that inventory fix for ocata, can you link? 16:14:09 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433802/ 16:14:16 Though Jenkins was being finnicky 16:14:23 yeah for newton, maybe it would be good for us to do it before the ptg :D 16:14:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433802/ for stable/ocata final 16:14:45 palendae: yeah :( i've put some bits in to reduce the memory footprint for uwsgi - it should help fix this (im hoping) 16:14:57 odyssey4me: sure i'll do a release tomorrow then 16:15:08 thanks andymccr 16:15:15 andymccr we have uwsgi used elsewhere - gnocchi/ceilometer I think? 16:15:27 maybe there are some workers/threads to reduce there too 16:15:49 odyssey4me: no i think the only other place is keystone and thats not by default 16:16:00 okie dokey 16:16:27 but yeah if anybody else knows of other memory saving places please push some patches for testing only :) 16:17:01 #topic Open Discussion 16:17:09 anymore for anymore? :) 16:17:32 so are the current integrated build failures largely OOM related? 16:17:38 for both ocata and master? 16:17:56 I mean besides the current github-is-falling-apart failures. 16:18:16 odyssey4me: yeah the ones ive seen at least 16:18:29 andymccr: As a hold over from Tuesday's meeting, I looked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1662466 and confirmed that what you listed is how it is currently meant to work, but I think we can change it, at least partially 16:18:29 Launchpad bug 1662466 in openstack-ansible "limit_container_types can't/won't filter certain vars" [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Nolan Brubaker (nolan-brubaker) 16:18:50 One of the cases you list may be tricky, but I didn't go too deep 16:19:27 palendae: yeah option 3 may not be required 16:19:28 hmm 16:19:41 We can offline that, just wanted to catch up with it 16:19:42 it does sound like a feature though 16:19:59 thanks yeah - imo that option isnt that useful or uniform as it is 16:20:02 late but here 16:20:14 Yeah, and I don't think documented 16:20:20 yeah that too 16:20:37 ok one more thing evrardjp did you want to talk about the ceph bug we had from bug triage on tuesday? 16:21:07 I haven't gathered a full list of OSA talks yet but voting is open for Boston presentations now. https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/18378 is one though ;) 16:21:32 Mine aren'y OSA specific but search for marrich:) 16:21:33 well I didn't got the chance to look at it andymccr, but I think it was not only interesting for me 16:21:40 I looked at the ceph bug and asked for some more details, it was fairly vague and after some hacking around I was not able to confirm the bug 16:21:41 it could be interesting for the community using ceph 16:21:54 logan-: that's good to hear 16:22:19 I'd like to see some more extensive logs to find out where the failure occurred in the playbooks, what packages were installed when it failed, etc 16:22:24 ahh nice logan- yeah we have a few talks that are up - i know oanson has put one in about using OSA to deploy dragonflow which is nice 16:22:45 andymccr: that's true :) 16:22:46 and major has a security talk up - i have one too. 16:22:53 Cool spotz :) 16:23:01 logan-: on that bug though - can you put a comment in to ask for more info? 16:23:05 yeah I did 16:23:14 on the bug there is already an answer 16:23:16 ahh awesome 16:23:19 thanks a bunch :) 16:23:19 telling hard to reproduce 16:23:31 so I think we'll leave it as is for now 16:23:45 probably put it as incomplete or invalid during next triage 16:23:46 logan- fantastic presentation proposal - would *love* to see it 16:23:49 ok nice thanks 16:24:43 ok - any other topics for discussion? :) 16:25:10 I guess vote for dragonflow: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/18479 16:25:11 :D 16:25:54 self plug evrardjp :P 16:26:00 haha :D 16:26:07 thanks odyssey4me 16:26:36 well let's do this properly: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/17616 and https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/18116 deserve votes too 16:26:37 good stuff evrardjp 16:26:47 and this one : https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/18145 :D 16:26:57 and I'm pretty sure many others! 16:27:11 good to see! 16:27:54 I'm interested by this one: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers/#/17943 16:28:24 yeah that does look good too 16:28:32 yes it does :D 16:28:56 fine is we're actually plugging:) https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/17610 https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/17686 https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/18301 and mudpuppy's https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/18264 :) 16:29:23 good to see adreznec's team represent ;) 16:29:36 odyssey4me: yeah agreed 16:29:42 +1 16:29:49 yes great things :) 16:29:59 thanks spotz, voting right now! 16:30:14 well - if there are no more discussion points - i'll see some of you next week (looking forward to it!) 16:30:18 +1 16:30:40 yep see some of you at the PTG next week! 16:31:13 yeah! 16:31:49 happy to leave this open for a few minutes 16:33:53 nothing from me 16:33:55 thanks andymccr 16:34:01 thanks 16:34:03 sweet :) 16:34:08 have a great weekend everybody! 16:34:11 #endmeeting