16:02:36 #startmeeting OpenStack Ansible Meeting 16:02:37 Meeting started Thu Oct 22 16:02:36 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is odyssey4me. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:41 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:02:44 o/ 16:02:51 o/ 16:03:38 o/ 16:04:26 o/ 16:05:17 hi 16:06:02 #topic Review action items from last week 16:06:24 odyssey4me to setup summit etherpads - done 16:06:34 odyssey4me to populate the upgrade session etherpad - done 16:06:45 odyssey4me to send ML announcements for the summit etherpads -done 16:06:54 mhayden update https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1491440 with current status 16:06:54 Launchpad bug 1491440 in openstack-ansible trunk "Restarting containers leads to 'dangling' veth interfaces" [Medium,Fix committed] - Assigned to Major Hayden (rackerhacker) 16:06:59 done 16:07:06 palendae to populate the Image-based deployments etherpad 16:07:08 done 16:07:09 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-mitaka-image-based-deployment 16:07:13 \o/ :) 16:07:19 o/ 16:07:31 #topic Mitaka Summit Agenda 16:07:43 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-mitaka-summit 16:07:48 I see most of you are going to the infra containers talk :D 16:08:01 or discussion 16:08:12 I'd encourage you to look at and add/modify https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TYO-ops-infrastructure-containers 16:08:29 doesn't look like kolla will be sending people so that section might be nix'd on site 16:09:26 next? 16:09:40 any questions/comments on the schedule? 16:10:23 ok, next: 16:10:26 #topic Reviews 16:10:36 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting 16:10:47 we have some reviews still on the go for the liberty release, for tomorrow 16:11:22 there are also some in progress, but neglected reviews here 16:11:24 #link https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/12.0.0 16:12:56 any volunteers to work on the wayward reviews to finalise them and make them work? 16:13:16 i'd be happy to do a few reviews on those ites 16:13:18 *items 16:13:32 this'd be good to get in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487433 16:13:32 Launchpad bug 1487433 in openstack-ansible trunk "Allow Horizon to be configured with external SSL termination" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Serge van Ginderachter (svg) 16:13:42 looks like we're missing 8 issues at this point 16:13:44 and this https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491968 16:13:44 Launchpad bug 1491968 in openstack-ansible trunk "Enable Neutron LBaaS" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Bjoern Teipel (bjoern-teipel) 16:14:07 sigmavirus24 not sure if this is still a thing? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474982 16:14:07 Launchpad bug 1474982 in openstack-ansible "auth_plugin to auth_type" [Medium,Confirmed] 16:14:24 I haven't tracked it's progress (or lack there of in OSA) 16:14:51 I would imagine that this could easily be moved on to 12.1.0 ? 16:14:53 But that is a change that should have happened for Liberty as I understand it and for which we may need to adjust to avoid spamming logs with deprecation warnings and other messages 16:14:57 odyssey4me: sure 16:15:23 ok, moved it to 12.1.0 16:15:59 okay 16:16:01 neutron l3ha is done and needs a final review: https://review.openstack.org/233389 16:17:08 neutron lbaas was working, and probably needs some minor tweaks to finalise it: https://review.openstack.org/220365 16:17:33 horizon external ssl termination is a nice to have, I think - we can move that to 12.1.0 - thoughts? 16:17:42 the work is here, and kept failing tempest: https://review.openstack.org/214647 16:19:49 thoughts/comments/questions? 16:20:14 i think we need to pull our the arp spoofing for 12.0.0 16:21:05 cloudnull yep, we may need to disable it by default until we can diagnose the cause of the issue with the non voting gate check 16:21:11 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238472/ 16:21:15 resurect this commit 16:21:40 well we're seeing it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238531/ 16:21:42 either that, or we need to find the cause - and we're running out of time 16:21:48 which failed tempest the same way 16:22:12 as well as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238223/ 16:22:40 so if we can't find a solution by the time I get in tomorrow, I'll resurrect the patch to disable it by default 16:22:43 happy with that? 16:23:02 sounds good 16:23:15 also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230716/ 16:23:35 we have 1 +2 -- need one more if we can :) 16:24:06 I intend to give that a closer look this afternoon after I do 1 more round of testing on my upgrade patch, cloudnull 16:24:15 But will need the other +2 still 16:24:17 i can update it for the nits that we're brought up 16:24:29 cloudnull rather do a follow on patch 16:24:53 at this stage I'm happy to +2 it, I've tested it and think it looks good except for the README nit 16:25:07 palendae happy for me to push the button? 16:25:49 odyssey4me: My main issue was that it was a big playbook, but now that it's a role that issue's been answered. I have not looked closely at the current implementation yet 16:26:17 I think that the current implementation is a lot easier to understand. 16:26:19 If you're comfortable I won't make noise :) 16:27:06 I can give you time to look through it and do my vote tomorrow morning if it's not in. That said I'd rather see it being used in gating for as long as possible to pick up any functional issues sooner rather than later. 16:27:18 Sure 16:27:24 I intend to look at it this afternoon 16:27:40 Probably while some AIOs build 16:27:40 ok, I'll check in again later this evening 16:28:31 https://review.openstack.org/205192 needs another vote - upstream is testing with a voting keystone v3 api check in the gate.... so I'm confortable making this move for liberty 16:29:29 odyssey4me: updates for the nits in the repo build review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238607/ 16:32:20 great, thanks cloudnull 16:32:50 any other questions, thoughts, or anything else related to the Liberty release? 16:33:19 #topic Upcoming Milestones 16:33:33 right, we have Juno 10.1.16 schedule for tomorrow 16:33:51 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226621 is still seeking testing and votes 16:33:53 Sounds of most interest to d3 16:33:58 Oh, he's not here 16:34:11 we need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236151/ 16:34:15 for 10.1.16 16:34:17 another juno item is https://review.openstack.org/237783 16:34:50 <_d34dh0r53_> i'm testing 226021 right now 16:35:13 Oh, that's why 16:35:14 swine netsplit 16:35:18 dunderdeadhorse 16:35:21 cool, thanks - it'd be great to get that out the door 16:36:01 Also, fyi for stuff like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236151/ - you can use the same Change-ID in manual backporting 16:36:05 how do we feel about juno falling into a security fix only release cycle from the liberty release? 16:36:10 So you can still associate a common change 16:36:18 ie the tag cadence drops to on request only 16:37:01 palendae yes, it's useful to do that in order to identify related changes across branches 16:37:33 Mixed feelings on that. Makes total sense for OSA. Inside my company, not sure how well it'll go over with existing installs 16:38:24 basically all I'm suggesting is that we no longer schedule tags - they are done on request 16:38:33 Ah 16:38:47 if people still submit patches, that's fine - they can get reviews and all that 16:38:54 If that's the only change, then sure, I don't see the harm 16:39:01 I would recommend that no more features go into the branch, but that's up to the consumers of the branch 16:40:01 ok 16:40:28 #info Juno branch tagging to shift to ad-hoc (on request) after the 10.1.16 release 16:41:25 #topic Open discussion 16:41:40 Does anyone wish to raise anythign else? 16:42:19 any reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236183/ would be greatly appreciated 16:42:58 ++ 16:43:05 shippable venv covers a lot of the repeatability process 16:43:40 which was recently converted to us the repo-build role. 16:44:36 additionally this came up in the channel the other day 16:44:37 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238223/ 16:45:05 what's it keep failing on? 16:45:24 which was an issue in a DC that didn't have access to contianer cache nameservers. 16:45:30 odyssey4me: its failing on dhcp issues 16:45:39 blast 16:45:56 which seem to be caused by the arp-spoofing 16:46:44 this also failed for the same reason https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238531/ 16:47:30 cloudnull did you notice that all the syslog files are zero byte? http://logs.openstack.org/31/238531/1/check/gate-openstack-ansible-dsvm-commit/ff7c5e0/logs/log-storage/ 16:48:33 hum... maybe something caused by the symlinking of the log dir 16:48:42 ok, it seems like we're done for today unless someone has something else to raise? 16:49:29 i got nothing 16:50:08 ok great, thank you all for your time! 16:50:15 #endmeeting