18:02:50 <heckj> #startmeeting
18:02:51 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 10 18:02:50 2012 UTC.  The chair is heckj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:02:52 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
18:03:02 <heckj> Ola all!
18:03:11 <heckj> working from Agenda here: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting
18:03:38 <heckj> #topic Status for Summit
18:04:10 <heckj> I'm not 100% on ttx' plan for scheduling the summit sessions, btu that should be getting nailed down shortly
18:04:50 <heckj> I've gone through and approved all the sessions, so we're pretty full up on times
18:04:59 <heckj> (i.e. completely booked for the time alloted)
18:05:24 <heckj> I'm going to run through and pre-create etherpads for the sessions as well. They match up with the blueprints currently listed
18:05:44 <heckj> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone
18:06:06 <heckj> Any questions related to prep for the summit?
18:07:24 <heckj> Okay - moving on
18:07:45 <heckj> #topic Hi Pri issues?
18:08:04 <heckj> I triaged 2 new bugs - one needs more information, the other is a "we'd like" future work piece
18:08:19 <heckj> Anyone aware of other high priority issues or other trouble on the release?
18:09:36 <heckj> ok...
18:09:40 <heckj> quiet morning. That's good
18:09:45 <heckj> last topic
18:09:48 <heckj> #topic Open Questions
18:09:55 <heckj> Whassup?
18:10:08 <rafaduran> about https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/972800
18:10:09 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 972800 in keystone "Identity backends provide get_by_name methods but  they aren't available via API" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
18:10:30 <rafaduran> I'm waiting some help about this to start developping something
18:10:49 <rafaduran> I've added a link to an extension I'm using meantime
18:12:03 * heckj looks
18:13:09 <heckj> rafaduran: you'll get more discussion rolling about your code if you do it as a git review against the current codebase.
18:14:17 <heckj> we'll also be talking about revising the API sets into something new (a next revision) at the summit - this would be a perfect component of that discussion
18:14:37 <rafaduran> heckj: I've done this extension because I needed inmediatly but now I wish add to keystone, but I don't really know if this fit at keystone core or contrib or whatever
18:15:11 <heckj> rafaduran: propose it as contrib for starters, and let's get feedback rolling on the folks looking at the code.
18:15:23 <rafaduran> heckj: ok, thanks
18:15:48 <heckj> anything/noeone else
18:15:56 <heckj> bcwaldon: everything cookin' along?
18:16:09 <bcwaldon> heckj: yep, just here to watch ;)
18:16:31 <rafaduran> I've also sent a patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/956954
18:16:32 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 956954 in keystone "Keystone needs a URL normalizer middleware" [Low,In progress]
18:16:52 <rafaduran> for folsom but I think a bit early
18:17:00 <rafaduran> so it wasn't reviewed
18:17:18 <heckj> cool - I'll take a look at it today and get some feedback rolling
18:17:18 <rafaduran> Do I re-send it o just discard it?
18:18:02 <heckj> rafarduran: you might remove your -1, people won't generally thinl/know to review if you're asserting "don't touch this" (which is what the -1 basically does)
18:18:27 <heckj> If you re-review that patch, it'll reactivate
18:18:40 <rafaduran> ok, I just wanted to mark it for folsom
18:19:06 <heckj> cool
18:21:38 <rafaduran> heckj: I think the patch can't be reviewed since it is marked abandoned
18:21:38 <heckj> If nothing else, I'll wrap this up for today...
18:22:02 <heckj> rafaduran: check out that patch, and invoke "git review" on it again and it'll reactivate
18:22:29 <rafaduran> heckj: ok
18:23:51 <heckj> rafaduran: you good?
18:29:58 <heckj> guessin' so
18:30:00 <heckj> closing this out
18:30:03 <heckj> #endmeeting